(1) I don't think Michelle Obama is a man. (2) I don't care that a UFC fighter made a bunch of leftists cry by saying Michelle Obama is a man. Leftists have been calling our President a Nazi, rapist, and pedophile for years. They've been calling our First Lady a prostitute since 2016. These are despicable people, and if they are offended and outraged, that makes me happy.

Leftists will spend months calling the President of the United States a Nazi, a rapist, and a pedophile, and then lose their shit because a random UFC fighter called Michelle Obama a man. Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

Everything this guy is bullshit. I take it back. People have called Michelle Obama a man. But the rest of it? Bullshit.

If Elon is worth $1.2 trillion, and it were all in cash, he could give every person on the planet about $145. Can we stop all this bullshit about solving world hunger with Elon's wealth? Can't happen.

Irony People who have spent the last decade pretending that men are women and women are men and gender is fluid and gender is a social construct are now outraged because someone said, “Michelle Obama is a man.”

The argument that someone who cures cancer should not be rewarded is not a good argument.

The ignorance about the 3/5 rule is on constant display on X. THE PURPOSE OF THE 3/5 COMPROMISE WAS TO REDUCE THE REPRESENTATION OF THE SLAVE STATES IN CONGRESS. IT WAS SLAVE OWNERS WHO WANTED SLAVES CLASSIFIED FULLY. When The Constitution was being written and debated, southern slave holders wanted slaves to be counted in the census even though they could not vote. That would give voters in the slave states a disproportionate number of representatives per voter. The northern states argued that since slaves could not vote, they should not be counted in the census. Eventually, they came to a compromise that slaves would be counted as 3/5 a free person. It had nothing to do with a person’s value. It was only about representation.

If the amount of money Elon Musk has has anything to do with your happiness or self worth, I feel bad for you.

Introduction The jury took less than three hours. They listened to the witnesses, examined the facts, rejected the self-defense claim, rejected the sudden-passion downgrade that would have treated a knife to the chest as a heat-of-the-moment lapse, and convicted Karmelo Anthony of murder. A Black teenager drove a blade into a White teenager at a high school track meet in Texas, and twelve citizens performed the increasingly rare act of weighing evidence instead of demographics. Within hours the familiar machinery engaged. Activists declared a legal lynching. A congresswoman announced that race had absolutely played a role. The usual professional mourners wailed that Black lives do not matter in Collin County. And into this theater of scripted racial suspicion stepped Senator Tim Kaine, who said he has a hard time understanding why anyone would call the verdict unfair or racially motivated. That single sentence of clarity is the exception that proves the pathology. We have built an entire apparatus whose primary function is to ensure that Black-on-White violence never remains a simple criminal event. It must be transformed, instantly, into a referendum on history, on systems, on the eternal guilt of the wrong skin. The dead boy becomes an acceptable loss in the larger accounting. The killer’s melanin becomes the mitigating circumstance that the culture is now trained to reach for before the body is even cold. This is not compassion. This is not even coherent moral reasoning. It is the closed cognitive loop of a regime that has decided some lives are more equal than others in death as in life, and that has professionalized the management of that inequality into careers, funding streams, and political power. The neurological hardware underneath is ancient and unforgiving. The human brain tags threat and affiliation along tribal lines with ruthless speed; this is not a social construct, it is mammalian operating code. What the current order has done is take that universal wiring and install it as public morality, but with the directional override permanently engaged. When the perpetrator carries the approved demographic and the victim does not, the script demands we interrogate the jury, the prosecutor, the culture, the history, the rain, the tent, the shove, anything except the decision to pull a knife and use it. When the demographics reverse, the script demands we interrogate nothing except the permanent stain of the wrong ancestry. The result is not safety…It is not healing…It is the steady erosion of the principle that murder is murder regardless of who holds the blade and who stops breathing. What follows is not another polite summary of a case already decided in a Texas courtroom. It is the refusal to participate in the management of selective outrage any longer. It is a forensic examination of the machinery that turns a straightforward homicide into a racial emergency the moment the wrong body hits the ground. It is the record of what happens when a culture decides that evidence is optional when the narrative requires it, and that coddling one demographic’s violence is the price of moral virtue. The boy who died on those bleachers deserved better than to become another data point in the grievance economy. The jury that convicted his killer did what the law still occasionally permits. The rest of us are left to decide whether we will keep pretending that skin color purchases a discount on the value of a human life, or whether we will finally say, without ellipsis or apology, that this bullshit has run its course. open.substack.com/pub/lhgrey…

Congratulations to @elonmusk for becoming the first trillionaire. 👏 See? It's not hard to be happy for other people's success.

John Derbyshire lost his job over this column. I think he makes many valid points here. takimag.com/article/the_talk…

This is so devastating. Imagine being a black parent tonight. How do you protect your children? If they go out and stab just one person, they might go to prison. It’s like a black man in America can’t even murder anyone anymore. Unimaginable. Jim Crow all over again. I’m furious.

Isn’t it funny how massive ballot dumps in the middle of the night after the election is over never seem to favor Republicans? Weird.

She loves the food and has had no problems with the people who own the business and work there. It is 100% about their race. Tell me again how black people can’t be racist.

How to say, "I have no idea what 'pro-life' means," without saying, "I have no idea what 'pro-life means."

You grieving the loss of your child is like the Menendez brothers grieving the loss of their parents.

We are good people because even though we murdered our child for having a disability, we feel really bad about it.

Now that it looks like there will not be any jurors looking to engage in nullification in the Karmelo Anthony trial, you just know the focus is going to be on intimidating the selected jurors.

🤣🤣🤣

"You should vote for James Talarico because he has a hot girlfriend," is possibly the dumbest thing I have seen on the Internet today. But it's still early.