Joined October 2009
227 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Taking some time off socials. If you want to talk and pick me up (or need a pick-me-up yourself) feel free to reach out over email. bbushong at msu dot edu. If a more personal touch sounds nice, just let me know and we can talk over the phone or Zoom. I love y'all. Take care.❤️
4
904
I would describe myself as “deeply miserable”. What. The. F*%#
1
3
834
A sober look at what the former president might bring in terms of executive expertise. @TimAlberta is one of the best in the game (his book is an absolute must-read) AND he's a diehard Michigan sports fan with deep ties to MSU 🤩
NEW — and several months in the making — my final look beneath the hood of Trump 2024. Pour a cup of coffee and find a comfy chair. “Inside the Ruthless, Restless Final Days of Trump’s Campaign” theatlantic.com/politics/arc…
634
Ben Bushong retweeted
Introducing our 2024-2025 job market candidates! For more information, visit spr.ly/6013qPOyW. #MSUEconomics #MSUSocialScience #EconTwitter
1
14
37
23,160
Quietly thinking to myself: "I haven't been this sick in..." [brain starts turning on] [open calendar] [dejected look sets in] "...six months." Healthy people, I envy you.
1
381
I know this isn’t a particularly timely reference or anything, but I’m genuinely curious if this is, in fact, The Bad Place.
4
780
Absolutely give my fullest endorsement. Go work with Kirby (and Caltech is okay, too)
1
662
Really neat -- thanks for the public service Jeff. <3
I was curious about how “top 5” pubs are distributed across US econ depts so scraped some data for the last 10 years (but note data caveats below). Thought others might also be interested- some was expected, some surprises. Fuller data- docs.google.com/spreadsheets…
1
382
I’m a little late to this party but…
1
274
New OpenAI model release. Completely agree with @sama's take: it's... better? But not the major leap that many would expect. One hopes that the next generation of models is... more. (I suspect that o1 builds off the skeleton of 4/4o, which means it isn't a huge leap in params.)
12 Sep 2024
here is o1, a series of our most capable and aligned models yet: openai.com/index/learning-to… o1 is still flawed, still limited, and it still seems more impressive on first use than it does after you spend more time with it.
401
This is a good outcome and great news for the broader scientific community. Keep fighting the good fight!
11 Sep 2024
Gino's case against us has been dismissed. Scientists cannot effectively sue other scientists for exposing fraud/errors in their work. Those who work to correct the scientific record can sleep better tonight. Those who don’t want it corrected, well, I don’t care how they sleep.
2
369
I didn't catch this post eons ago but having just read it, I completely endorse this view. Real learning is difficult and at times stressful. It can be uncomfortable and takes time. There are very few ideas that you can truly grasp from a series of short posts. Thread below 🧵 ...just kidding, obviously.
# on shortification of "learning" There are a lot of videos on YouTube/TikTok etc. that give the appearance of education, but if you look closely they are really just entertainment. This is very convenient for everyone involved : the people watching enjoy thinking they are learning (but actually they are just having fun). The people creating this content also enjoy it because fun has a much larger audience, fame and revenue. But as far as learning goes, this is a trap. This content is an epsilon away from watching the Bachelorette. It's like snacking on those "Garden Veggie Straws", which feel like you're eating healthy vegetables until you look at the ingredients. Learning is not supposed to be fun. It doesn't have to be actively not fun either, but the primary feeling should be that of effort. It should look a lot less like that "10 minute full body" workout from your local digital media creator and a lot more like a serious session at the gym. You want the mental equivalent of sweating. It's not that the quickie doesn't do anything, it's just that it is wildly suboptimal if you actually care to learn. I find it helpful to explicitly declare your intent up front as a sharp, binary variable in your mind. If you are consuming content: are you trying to be entertained or are you trying to learn? And if you are creating content: are you trying to entertain or are you trying to teach? You'll go down a different path in each case. Attempts to seek the stuff in between actually clamp to zero. So for those who actually want to learn. Unless you are trying to learn something narrow and specific, close those tabs with quick blog posts. Close those tabs of "Learn XYZ in 10 minutes". Consider the opportunity cost of snacking and seek the meal - the textbooks, docs, papers, manuals, longform. Allocate a 4 hour window. Don't just read, take notes, re-read, re-phrase, process, manipulate, learn. And for those actually trying to educate, please consider writing/recording longform, designed for someone to get "sweaty", especially in today's era of quantity over quality. Give someone a real workout. This is what I aspire to in my own educational work too. My audience will decrease. The ones that remain might not even like it. But at least we'll learn something.
2
1,075
I've been annoyed by this emerging (mostly online) conversation about the future costs of AI to users. Frankly, I find the discussion around @OpenAI charging huge monthly subscriptions utterly absurd given the current capabilities of their models. Don't get me wrong: current-gen LLMs are amazing! But they are nowhere close to worth ~$100/month except in extreme edge cases (e.g., you're a mediocre programmer doing very simple things for a living and could use an assistant). Moreover: markets are a thing and price competition is likely to eliminate any scope for grossly high rents unless one firm has some fundamental breakthrough that is not replicable by others. I'm bearish on this outcome. Of course, the reader should have wide confidence intervals. My projections for the future of AI have been wrong in both directions---I didn't think that the current approach would be as successful as it has been, nor did I think it would plateau as fast as I think it has. GPT-5 could prove me wrong but for now, I think this conversation is *wildly* premature.
More software should cost $2,000/month.
476
I think this is one of those "balanced panels" I've been hearing about...
“A little more to the left.” Happy #Caturday!
4
380
I missed you, California. Now get in my belly.
1
1
465
Hey @PeteButtigieg, if you're looking to run for Governor in 2026, let me know and I'll take leave and come help. (Or let me just buy you and @Chasten a beer at Hop Lot.) youtube.com/watch?v=tgFPxgst…
1
399
Since I randomly acquired a blue check, let me be perfectly clear: I think @elonmusk is a jerk, his stated policy preferences are backwards and regressive, and his demonstrably anti-labor business practices abhorrent. I will not pay him or his companies money now or ever.
2
16
6,146