Follow me for Bigfoot stories & UFO discussions 👣🛸 – sharing sightings & theories! Proud Native American 🪶 Stoic devoted to Jesus Christ 💜🙏💜

Joined May 2008
5,138 Photos and videos
👣🪶 BIGFOOT: SACRED GUARDIAN OF THE WILD! Proud Native American & follower of Christ, I explore Bigfoot with deep respect—no kill, only wonder. The Patterson-Gimlin Film captured one genuine rare moment of Patty. My Lucky Capture Hypothesis explains the documentary’s new footage as human replication born of failings, opportunism & financial desperation from a dying man. Share your sightings, theories & LCH thoughts! Follow for mystical insights & respectful discussion. What’s your take? 🙏🛸
10
3
42
15,325
Spielberg on God & aliens: Thoughtful question or echo-chamber assumption? My take as a Christian who’s been ready for decades. Steven Spielberg recently posed this while promoting his new film Disclosure Day: “Is God, our God only on this planet, or is God a God for every system where there’s civilization, intelligent life, and even developing life?” I wasn’t offended—in fact, I appreciated the honesty. Questions like this matter as we wrestle with UAP/NHI, the vastness of creation, and what it all means for faith. He seems to assume many “religious people” would face major ontological shock from such discoveries. But is that the full picture? To be fair, yes—there are Christians (and others) with a narrower view of Creation. Some believe that if Scripture doesn’t explicitly mention something—like extraterrestrial beings—then it simply can’t exist. Their theology leaves little room beyond angels, demons, and humans, so any NHI often gets labeled “demonic” to fit the framework. This approach is sincere and comes from a deep commitment to biblical authority. I get it. But here’s the encouraging part: this narrower view is a minority position within global Christendom. With roughly 2.5 billion Christians worldwide, the majority—across Catholic, Orthodox, mainline Protestant, and many evangelical traditions—have long embraced a far bigger vision. They see the God of Colossians 1:15-20 as the Creator and reconciler of all things, visible and invisible. Not just our little planet, but the entire cosmos. Even in the film itself, a wise nun character makes this point gently: Genesis describes humanity as God’s supreme creation on Earth (see Genesis 1:26-28), leaving room for the Creator’s work across the vast cosmos. Spielberg clearly resonated with that expansive take. I’ve held this expansive view my whole life. Even as a child, it was clear to me: my God is the God of everything. That intuition has only deepened through decades of faith, Scripture study, Ojibwe heritage (seeing stewardship and kinship in creation, like Sabe as eldest relative), personal encounters, and reflection on high strangeness. A vast universe with other intelligent life doesn’t challenge a sovereign Creator—it glorifies Him. Thinkers like C.S. Lewis explored this beautifully in his Space Trilogy and essays, imagining unfallen worlds and a cosmic Christ whose redemption fits a grander story. N.T. Wright and others echo the same cosmic hope. People like Spielberg may not realize just how many “religious people” were already ready—prepared by a faith that starts with God as the bedrock axiom for all reality. Perhaps it’s a reminder that echo chambers can limit our view of the faithful across the globe. No shade intended; we all benefit from stepping outside them now and then. At the end of the day, whether disclosure brings new neighbors or confirms what some of us have long sensed, our call remains the same: love God, steward creation with care, test the spirits, and walk in hope. Christ holds all things together. The heavens declare His glory—and I think other worlds do too. What do you think? Open to civil conversation on this. #Bigfoot #UAP #UFO #DisclosureDay #FaithAndScience
6
1
8
797
Is it really okay to kill a Bigfoot for science just to “prove” they exist? Some say yes — “no body, no proof.” But if these intelligent forest beings (Sabe) are out there, does the end justify the means? Or does killing one cross a moral line we can’t uncross? Poll reminder: •Yes: Kill for science •No: Non-lethal proof •Last resort only •Never: Respect them Encounters, reasons, or counter-arguments welcome. Make your voice heard below 👇 #Bigfoot #Sasquatch #Sabe
Is the only way to prove Bigfoot real… to kill one and bring back the body? “No body, no proof,” say some. But at what cost to these intelligent forest beings? Would you support killing one? 👇 Encounters and explanations welcome! #Bigfoot #Sasquatch
10
10
547
New York “Baby Bigfoot” Swinging in the Trees 👣🪶 This 1997 footage from upstate New York (Catskills area, near Modena/Ardonia) captures campers by a creek/fire, but in the background, something small and agile swings from tree limbs like a primate. About 3-4 feet tall per measurements, quick movements, hanging and swinging—looks like a juvenile Bigfoot having a carefree moment. Shot inadvertently by Doug Pridgen; later featured on Finding Bigfoot and discussed by researchers. NOTE: The subject(s) are hard to see in the original, so you have to watch closely. I’ve created a 41-second zoomed-in version focused on where the figure(s) are silhouetted among the trees. I recommend watching this a few times — the movement should become obvious. In the first few seconds you can see a large bipedal figure walking to the left and the smaller figure jumping up into the trees. The camera looks down and when it comes back up you can see the smaller figure moving to the right to do some swinging. Not crystal clear — it’s low-light 90s home video — but the behavior stands out: agile climbing and arm-hanging swing that doesn’t scream “human kid” or obvious prop in context. Experts in the Meldrum/Bindernagel tradition have noted consistent patterns of family groups, tree use, and elusive juveniles in Sasquatch reports across North America. When I first saw this years ago, the subject’s speed through the branches struck me. I had a hard time picturing a juvenile Bigfoot, so my mind defaulted to a long-armed monkey — maybe a pet or zoo escapee. Some call it a flag flapping in the wind. I can almost see that… but movement to the left of the tree shows a larger individual before the “baby” appears. That eliminates the flag debunk for me. On provenance and authenticity, I’m 100% confident. My friend Steve Kulls (the Squatch Detective) vetted the owner, so I rule out hoax claims. • Cliff Barackman: “It is clear that whatever it is… is an ape… leaning towards it being a juvenile sasquatch” (recreated movements on-site, ruled out human)
 • Bobo Fay (Finding Bigfoot): “It is definitely a primate… I think we’re looking at a juvenile sasquatch”
 • Ranae Holland (Finding Bigfoot skeptic): Likely a gibbon or escaped pet monkey
 • Esteban Sarmiento & George Schaller (primatologists, via BFRO): Smaller figure is an ape — exceptionally large gibbon, year-old chimpanzee, or unclassified ape species
 • Steve Kulls (Squatch Detective): Vetted owner — authentic provenance, no hoax
 • BFRO analysis: Frame-by-frame — not hoaxed; consistent with primate family group patterns What do you see in that tree—baby Bigfoot, monkey, or something else? Be honest, I can take it 😆 #Bigfoot #Sasquatch #BabyBigfoot
6
3
20
779
I recommend toggling the video back and forth and focus on these areas to see the movement. There is clearly a large bipedal figure in the left circle and a small subject in trees. There’s no way the one in the trees is a human, but the one on the ground? I reckon this is a guy with a pet monkey or a daddy Bigfoot taking his kid to the trees for some fun.
4
142
Q: Why aren't there more Bigfoot jokes? A: There are, but they're really hard to find! 😏 #FunnyfootFriday #Bigfoot
🦶 FUNNYFOOT FRIDAY Comes in Peace 👽🛸👣 I mean come on now, can’t we all just be along? 😂 Drop your best Bigfoot-UFO-cryptid memes, role-reversal jokes, high-strangeness giggles, or alien negotiation fails below 👇 Funnyfoot ™ — Keeping timelines weird and wonderful since 2025 👣👏 #FunnyfootFriday #Bigfoot #UFO
1
7
198
Is the only way to prove Bigfoot real… to kill one and bring back the body? “No body, no proof,” say some. But at what cost to these intelligent forest beings? Would you support killing one? 👇 Encounters and explanations welcome! #Bigfoot #Sasquatch
25% Yes — kill for science
50% No — non-lethal proof
6% Last resort only
19% Never — respect & protect
16 votes • 5 days
13
3
12
926
Michael Shermer’s latest post mocking David Grusch by comparing him to Marshall Applewhite of the Heaven’s Gate cult is a disgraceful low point. Equating a decorated intelligence official and congressional whistleblower—who has testified under oath about recovered non-human craft and biologics—with a suicidal cult leader isn’t skepticism; it’s lazy, contemptuous ad hominem that dodges every piece of evidence Grusch has put forward. This isn’t engaging the claims. It’s not demanding better data or offering counter-analysis. It’s a cheap visual smear designed to signal “anyone who takes this seriously is delusional.” Shermer, who positions himself as a champion of reason and scientific inquiry, has instead revealed a reflexive tribal dismissal that undermines his own credibility on these topics. True skepticism requires rigorous examination of extraordinary claims, not ridicule by association. Grusch’s testimony, backed by his background and multiple corroborating insiders, deserves substantive engagement—not t-shirt mockery. Shermer owes Grusch and the public a genuine apology for this deplorable display. It doesn’t advance knowledge; it poisons the conversation. #UAP #Disclosure
"Damn. If only I had subscribed to SKEPTIC magazine." Time for a new t-shirt as Marshall Applewhite (Heaven's Gate) has been replaced by David Grusch...
3
1
6
588
🦶 FUNNYFOOT FRIDAY Comes in Peace 👽🛸👣 I mean come on now, can’t we all just be along? 😂 Drop your best Bigfoot-UFO-cryptid memes, role-reversal jokes, high-strangeness giggles, or alien negotiation fails below 👇 Funnyfoot ™ — Keeping timelines weird and wonderful since 2025 👣👏 #FunnyfootFriday #Bigfoot #UFO
6
1
16
495
It’s THUNDERFOOT THURSDAY — Quick Cryptid Clips edition! 👀🦶🎥 Short, eerie AI-generated video clips are perfect for capturing that fleeting cryptid energy — the blur of motion, the impossible stride, the high-strangeness vibe that makes your spine tingle. Here are a few I created the last couple of weeks that I think came out pretty well. Grok Imagine gets better all the time. Drop your best quick cryptid AI video clips below (Bigfoot, Dogman, Mothman, or any forest watcher — the creepier and more atmospheric, the better)! Short loops, motion tests, or dramatic encounters all welcome. Let’s flood the timeline with moving cryptid mystery. 👇 #ThunderfootThursday #Bigfoot #Cryptid
5
2
16
435
Birch Bay Bigfoot (2021) Birch Bay, WA trail cam footage from April 28, 2021 Jimmy B Trail Cams / Stealth Cam, ~8:57 PM I can’t find a less edited version because it seems the original is no longer online, so I had to go with this popular edited version for analysis. What I see: • Audio ‘footsteps’ don’t sync with the visible leg movements at all. • The figure moves with an unnaturally fluid, gliding gait and almost zero vertical bob — unlike real bipedal motion in the Patterson-Gimlin Film, Paul Freeman footage, or humans walking uneven terrain. • Heavy post-processing: slowed down, brightened, text overlays, and zooms. To me, this looks more like CGI than a real creature. It wasn’t AI-generated (that level of quality and integration wasn’t available in 2021), so if manipulated, it would have been done by a human using traditional CGI tools. Additional context: • Posted by a homesteader whose other videos show normal wildlife. • Weeks later, four of his trail cams reportedly went missing (he linked it to this sighting). • No tracks found afterward. Hoax? Bear on two legs? Bigfoot despite the edits? What do you think? #Bigfoot #Sasquatch #TrailCam
10
2
39
1,568
When you’re feeling down, don’t forget to…
7
29
301
Bigfoot… this is how it begins. 👣🪶 🤔 It starts as a fun modern myth. Hairy ape-man in the woods? Campfire stories and blurry photos. Harmless entertainment. 🤨 Then something shifts. Maybe it’s possible. A relict hominid surviving the last Ice Age? Hiding in the vast, rugged wilds of North America? Science has missed things before. 🧐 Remember the mountain gorillas? Dismissed as legend until the 20th century. Or the okapi, or giant squid. Why not a North American primate? The forests are deep. The wilderness is bigger than we admit. 😲 Evidence piles up. Massive footprints with dermal ridges that experts can’t fake. Clear audio—wood knocks, whoops, and language-like chatter. Nests, hair, scat with unusual DNA. And yes, videos. The Patterson-Gimlin Film still stands up under modern scrutiny. These aren’t just misidentified bears. 😮 Thousands of eyewitnesses—hunters, loggers, families—describe beings that act… intelligent. Not dumb animals. More like people. Native American traditions across tribes have long known them as Sabe, or the “eldest brother,” forest guardians, kin. They have culture. They have family units. They avoid us… until they don’t. 🤔 Then the weirdness creeps in. Witnesses report orbs of light. Trickster behavior—objects moving, stones thrown, things that feel… playful or testing. High strangeness that overlaps with UFO accounts. At first you roll your eyes at the “woo woo” crowd. 🤨🤨 But the reports keep coming. Portals? Interdimensional aspects? Minds opening to possibilities beyond our current science? The universe is vast. Creation is wilder than our textbooks. 😮😲😮 And then it gets personal… You go out respectfully. Quietly seeking. Not hunting. Just listening. And in the stillness of the forest, you hear them—not just with your ears. In your mind. Clear as a whisper: “If you stop and remain, we will come to you.” That moment changes everything. … … … Trust me, friends—when you truly embark on this journey with an open heart and clear eyes, you’re not prepared for where it leads. The questions get bigger. The respect deepens. You start seeing the woods differently. You honor creation more fully. It connects to heritage, to stewardship, to something ancient and true. But you’ll be glad you did. The path reveals more than just Bigfoot. It reveals layers of reality… and something about ourselves. 😁 Who’s on this journey already? Drop your “I used to think it was just myth until…” story below👇👣 #Bigfoot #Sasquatch #Sabe
7
2
31
983
I’ve loved Bigfoot ever since I first laid eyes on Patty in the Patterson-Gimlin film. We hear about the experts and researchers, and it’s easy to think they know it all. But for me, I’m just Bugs — an enthusiastic Bigfoot enthusiast on an ongoing journey of discovery. There’s *so* much information out there, and *so* many encounters. Today a friend shared a powerful video that had completely flown under my radar for years. One of the best parts of doing “Bugs Finds Bigfoot” as I approach my first anniversary is this: every time I hunt for good posts, I end up learning something new from this amazing community — especially from the wonderful people I’ve met and continue to meet along the way. I’m truly grateful to be part of it. 👣🪶
11
6
50
720
Don’t miss the 4th Annual Big Muddy Monster Festival this month! 🎉 If you’re in the Murphysboro area or can make the trip to Southern Illinois on Saturday, June 20, head downtown (13th & Walnut) from 9 AM – 4 PM. Expect vendors, local shops, live demos, oddities, a Big Muddy Monster search party, and full-on cryptid community vibes. Perfect way to celebrate the legend! Anyone going? 👇👣 #BigMuddyMonster #Murphysboro #BigMuddyMonsterFestival
Murphysboro Mud Monster: The Big Muddy Cryptid of 1973 In the summer of 1973, the small town of Murphysboro, Illinois, along the Big Muddy River, became ground zero for one of America’s most credible cryptid flaps: the Murphysboro Mud Monster aka Big Muddy Monster. On June 25 around midnight, a young couple parked near Riverside Park boat ramp heard a piercing scream “like an eagle shrieking into a microphone.” A 7–8 ft tall creature, covered in light-colored hair matted with mud and river slime, lumbered toward their car. They fled to the police station. Officers later found 10–12 inch footprints, heard the scream themselves, and discovered a black slime trail leading to the river. The next evening in Westwood Hills, two teens (Cheryl Ray & Randy Creath) came face-to-face with it just 15 feet away on their porch. They described a stocky ~350 lb biped, long arms, roundish head, matted dirty-white hair like an English sheepdog, foul stench, and eyes that some said glowed red. It stared briefly then walked off into the woods. Police searches with tracking dogs found more prints, broken brush, and splashing — but no creature. The case file remains open to this day. Witnesses consistently noted it walking more erect than a typical ape — more human-like in posture and build, stocky like a football player, with that distinctive muddy white/silver hair. I can’t help but wonder if it could have been a feral human… were it not for those huge 10–12 inch prints that clearly rule out any normal person in my estimation. I recently saw photos of the impressive bronze statue Murphysboro erected to honor the legend. It strikes me as strikingly human in form compared to the more ape-like depictions we often see in Bigfoot art. The broad shoulders, upright stance, and overall proportions feel closer to eyewitness accounts of a bipedal “man-beast” than a hunched gorilla. Does that match what people pictured from the 1973 reports? Or has the statue evolved the visual legend? Curious what folks think. Southern Illinois has a rich cryptid history — this one feels especially grounded with multiple independent witnesses, police involvement, and physical traces. If you’re in the Murphysboro area, near the Big Muddy River, or have family roots in Southern Illinois — have you or anyone you know ever had a sighting, heard strange screams/knocks, or found odd tracks? Have there been any more recent sightings or unusual activity in the years since? Do you think the Big Muddy Monster is still around? Drop your stories below 👇👣 #BigMuddyMonster #Murphysboro #Bigfoot
4
3
25
1,042
Murphysboro Mud Monster: The Big Muddy Cryptid of 1973 In the summer of 1973, the small town of Murphysboro, Illinois, along the Big Muddy River, became ground zero for one of America’s most credible cryptid flaps: the Murphysboro Mud Monster aka Big Muddy Monster. On June 25 around midnight, a young couple parked near Riverside Park boat ramp heard a piercing scream “like an eagle shrieking into a microphone.” A 7–8 ft tall creature, covered in light-colored hair matted with mud and river slime, lumbered toward their car. They fled to the police station. Officers later found 10–12 inch footprints, heard the scream themselves, and discovered a black slime trail leading to the river. The next evening in Westwood Hills, two teens (Cheryl Ray & Randy Creath) came face-to-face with it just 15 feet away on their porch. They described a stocky ~350 lb biped, long arms, roundish head, matted dirty-white hair like an English sheepdog, foul stench, and eyes that some said glowed red. It stared briefly then walked off into the woods. Police searches with tracking dogs found more prints, broken brush, and splashing — but no creature. The case file remains open to this day. Witnesses consistently noted it walking more erect than a typical ape — more human-like in posture and build, stocky like a football player, with that distinctive muddy white/silver hair. I can’t help but wonder if it could have been a feral human… were it not for those huge 10–12 inch prints that clearly rule out any normal person in my estimation. I recently saw photos of the impressive bronze statue Murphysboro erected to honor the legend. It strikes me as strikingly human in form compared to the more ape-like depictions we often see in Bigfoot art. The broad shoulders, upright stance, and overall proportions feel closer to eyewitness accounts of a bipedal “man-beast” than a hunched gorilla. Does that match what people pictured from the 1973 reports? Or has the statue evolved the visual legend? Curious what folks think. Southern Illinois has a rich cryptid history — this one feels especially grounded with multiple independent witnesses, police involvement, and physical traces. If you’re in the Murphysboro area, near the Big Muddy River, or have family roots in Southern Illinois — have you or anyone you know ever had a sighting, heard strange screams/knocks, or found odd tracks? Have there been any more recent sightings or unusual activity in the years since? Do you think the Big Muddy Monster is still around? Drop your stories below 👇👣 #BigMuddyMonster #Murphysboro #Bigfoot
6
4
37
2,575
Hey there, @2015hemiram345 I finally got around to posting about his bad boy. Thanks for pointing him out to me a while back.
1
8
152
Still the gold standard of Bigfoot evidence? 👣 Look closer at these frames from the Patterson-Gimlin Film: the muscle rippling, natural arm swing, compliant gait, and that unforgettable over-the-shoulder glance… with 1967 technology. Even against the new Capturing Bigfoot claims and decades of debunk attempts, my Lucky Capture Hypothesis still holds strong. What stands out most to you on a fresh look? Real Sasquatch? Suit? Something else? Grateful for the thoughtful discussion so far — civil takes always welcome. 🪶 #Bigfoot #PGF #Sasquatch
The Patterson-Gimlin Film (1967) – Still the Gold Standard or Masterful Hoax? 👣 I first saw this as a kid in the early ’70s and it terrified me. Decades later, after my own 2014 Bluff Creek encounter and years of digging into the evidence, it became foundational. Enhanced stabilization reveals clearer muscle rippling and compliant foot flex, along with the natural gait, arm swing, and footprint context… with 1967 tech limitations? It still holds up powerfully. The Capturing Bigfoot Documentary Controversy Recent discussions around the new footage in Capturing Bigfoot have reignited the debate. The documentary presents a ~40-second clip (shot on old Kodachrome stock) as a pre-1967 “dress rehearsal” suit test, with claims it proves the whole thing was a premeditated hoax. Many are quick to declare the PGF debunked based on it. My Lucky Capture Hypothesis addresses these objections head-on: The PGF captured one extraordinarily lucky daytime moment of a real Sasquatch (Patty). The new footage? A post-1967 human attempt to study and replicate her distinctive walk for follow-on docudrama or promotional projects—building directly on Bill Munns’ forensic analysis while adding the human motivation layer (ambition, opportunism, and financial pressures). It turns the new clip from a threat into indirect support for Patty’s authenticity. Humans could copy the visible gait with reference material, but they couldn’t replicate the underlying biology. That’s why I’m not accepting claims that the PGF has been conclusively debunked until we can all get our eyes on the full documentary ourselves. I’m convinced by the film itself and require a solid counter to the forensic work of the late Jeff Meldrum and Bill Munns to change my mind. Me? I’m all in because I’ve personally encountered these amazing beings. As an Ojibwe man who follows Jesus, I see this as part of the Creator’s vast, mysterious world—Sabe (Bigfoot), our eldest brother in the woods, worthy of respect and stewardship, not dismissal or exploitation. New followers and longtime friends: What do you see when you watch the stabilized Patty footage? Suit? Real? Hoax? Have you followed the Capturing Bigfoot claims? Drop your best evidence, thoughts on the Lucky Capture Hypothesis, or counters below—civil discussion always welcome. #Bigfoot #PGF #Sasquatch #CapturingBigfoot
5
1
17
643
The Patterson-Gimlin Film (1967) – Still the Gold Standard or Masterful Hoax? 👣 I first saw this as a kid in the early ’70s and it terrified me. Decades later, after my own 2014 Bluff Creek encounter and years of digging into the evidence, it became foundational. Enhanced stabilization reveals clearer muscle rippling and compliant foot flex, along with the natural gait, arm swing, and footprint context… with 1967 tech limitations? It still holds up powerfully. The Capturing Bigfoot Documentary Controversy Recent discussions around the new footage in Capturing Bigfoot have reignited the debate. The documentary presents a ~40-second clip (shot on old Kodachrome stock) as a pre-1967 “dress rehearsal” suit test, with claims it proves the whole thing was a premeditated hoax. Many are quick to declare the PGF debunked based on it. My Lucky Capture Hypothesis addresses these objections head-on: The PGF captured one extraordinarily lucky daytime moment of a real Sasquatch (Patty). The new footage? A post-1967 human attempt to study and replicate her distinctive walk for follow-on docudrama or promotional projects—building directly on Bill Munns’ forensic analysis while adding the human motivation layer (ambition, opportunism, and financial pressures). It turns the new clip from a threat into indirect support for Patty’s authenticity. Humans could copy the visible gait with reference material, but they couldn’t replicate the underlying biology. That’s why I’m not accepting claims that the PGF has been conclusively debunked until we can all get our eyes on the full documentary ourselves. I’m convinced by the film itself and require a solid counter to the forensic work of the late Jeff Meldrum and Bill Munns to change my mind. Me? I’m all in because I’ve personally encountered these amazing beings. As an Ojibwe man who follows Jesus, I see this as part of the Creator’s vast, mysterious world—Sabe (Bigfoot), our eldest brother in the woods, worthy of respect and stewardship, not dismissal or exploitation. New followers and longtime friends: What do you see when you watch the stabilized Patty footage? Suit? Real? Hoax? Have you followed the Capturing Bigfoot claims? Drop your best evidence, thoughts on the Lucky Capture Hypothesis, or counters below—civil discussion always welcome. #Bigfoot #PGF #Sasquatch #CapturingBigfoot
9
24
1,609
2014 was a good year 👣
2
10
153