We are building Axiom: a social platform for coherent, first principles thinking.
Joined November 2025
- Tweets 36
- Following 3
- Followers 49
- Likes 17
3 Photos and videos
May 20
Why is it you believe what you believe? For every belief, either you have a justification, or you "just believe it". We're building Axiom to bring clarity to your thought, which means helping you identify these two categories in your own thinking. In Axiom, justified beliefs are theorems, and just-so beliefs are your personal axioms.
3
46
Apr 11
The goal with Axiom is to systematize the tools that modern science has already come to consensus on: formal logic, explicit assumptions, and verifiable reasoning. In order to put them in the hands of everyday people in a way that is approachable.
1
117
In the information age, ideas are the most valuable technology. AI has only proven that more true. Yet the main technology we use to understand and debate ideas—natural language—is literally from the Stone Age. That's the massive gap we're tackling with Axiom.
2
92
On Axiom, your profile is the axioms you've chosen to state and the theorems that follow from them. Users can prove new theorems from your axioms; those theorems appear on your profile whether you like them or not. If you don't want a theorem to appear, you revise your axioms.
404
Mar 27
Formal logic should not be intimidating. Logic makes explicit the rules we implicitly use to understand the world. Formal logic is simply adding a framework that enables us to use these rules in complex ways without making mistakes.
1
2
70
Coherence Labs retweeted
Mar 20
2
3
8
309
Mar 21
Axiom ensures all arguments are valid and transparent. By making valid logic a basic requirement, online discourse is elevated to the level of precision needed to make progress on the biggest issues facing us today.
2
45
Mar 15
Axiom doesn't care if the world is made of cheese; it only cares that your 'Cheese-World' theorem doesn't contradict itself.
3
360
Coherence Labs retweeted
Mar 15
We can both speak English and yet not speak the same language. What if we had indicators for definitional overlap? You could see how likely you are to be misunderstood and adjust your behavior accordingly.
1
1
6
413
Mar 12
The next epoch of knowledge will be logically consistent and traceable.
Axiom is the first platform where first principles aren't optional. Using patent-pending technology and AI, you can encode your ideas and verify the logical validity of all claims on the platform.
coherencelabs.net
3
116
Mar 11
Axiom unlocks the power of computation to exponentially magnify your thinking. By automatically deriving implications and finding connections, our system helps you identify novel insights and accelerate progress without compromising rigor.
1
1
129
Mar 10
Deceptive logical fallacies can be eliminated from online debate. Using our patent-pending technology to ground discourse in formal logic, Axiom renders structural fallacies—like the motte-and-bailey—mathematically invalid. It's a platform for a new standard of integrity.
1
1
3
183
We formally verfied this argument to be valid ✅
On our platform Axiom, once something has been proven, it is no longer up for debate. All users are required to accept the conclusion if they hold the premise to be true.
Mar 6
Disputing the possibility of AI consciousness requires one of two beliefs, both of which I find implausible:
1. Consciousness is linked to certain capabilities that AI will also never possess. If someone believes this, I’d be happy to make a bet with them.
2. Consciousness can be totally divorced from capabilities, meaning it’s extraneous. Useless. It’s not the source of any of our insight or creativity or even the cause of us talking about consciousness! This is the position where philosophical zombies are possible. Then the question becomes “why do humans have consciousness?” If it’s irrelevant for capabilities, it seems odd that evolution would have produced it. And it certainly feels like our subjective states are part of the causal chain! And “feels like” is all we really have to go on when it comes to consciousness.
Personally, I think evolution produced consciousness because it had to, because it is linked to or synonymous with certain capabilities, and so sufficiently powerful AI systems will also have it.
*note: the term “consciousness” is notoriously vague. I tried to structure this argument in a way that’s agnostic to someone’s precise definition and can be substituted with “whatever special thing you think humans have”
1
175
With Axiom, we're putting ontology and computational reasoning in the hands of everyday people.
2
254
Our novel architecture solves the issues with previous formal semantics technology. Axiom replaces top-down consensus with a flexible shared environment where mathematically verified ideas can freely compete, adapt, and naturally evolve.
77
By enabling us to use formal semantics to define our ideas, Axiom unlocks unambiguous communication and mathematically provable conclusions. It brings the power of rigorous mathematics to everyday online discourse.
coherencelabs.net
2
43,818