'They took £20,000 I didn't owe': Parents hit by child maintenance errors bbc.in/43gMXQE

'They took £20,000 I didn't owe': Parents hit by child maintenance errors bbc.in/496vxtA

“I thought I had been scammed .” Nearly 20k disappeared from a bank account through child maintenance enforcement - before the dispute was resolved . The DWP says enforcement can be challenged , but doesn’t publish data on how often it’s wrong . #uknews tinyurl.com/4xxusnp2

Ignored by consecutive governments a scandal which over shadows the Post Office. @MelJStride @KemiBadenoch @EstherMcVey1 bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq8w…

A scandal by far bigger than the Horizon post Office has just been exposed by the BBC @elonmusk @10DowningStreet @DWPgovuk @UKSFO @GovernmentLegal @alancampbellmp @stephenctimms @stephenctimms @Debbie_abrahams @DailyMirror @Telegraph @Daily_Express @CommonsLeader @anticorruption bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq8w…

Britons! Your country needs YOU. Unite the Kingdom – May 16th, London. @TRobinsonNewEra @elonmusk

The £4 Billion Lie: Why the State Framed ‘Deadbeat Dads’ — and What It Means Today. the-4billion-pound-lie.blogs… For over 30 years, the UK Government and the charity Gingerbread have portrayed non-resident parents as villains/Deadbeat Dads — claiming a colossal £4 billion in unpaid child-maintenance. But the truth? In a Work and Pensions Select Committee oral hearing it was admitted the Child Support Agency was “interfering in private arrangements… for the benefit of the state, not the children.” Evidence shows Interim Maintenance Assessments were inflated up to 300%, which rendered the arrears mostly uncollectable and were used to justify draconian enforcement that’s caused real harm. @DWPgovuk @10DowningStreet @Debbie_abrahams @UKLabour @Conservatives @KemiBadenoch @EstherMcVey1 @MelJStride @hrw @cabinetofficeuk @pollytoynbee @mensrightsbunny @guardian

If one immigrates to any given country, they must respect the laws and culture of that country and contribute to that country to the best of their ability, doing no harm. That applies to ALL countries.

💥 THE CHILD MAINTENANCE SERVICE IS COMPLETELY INCOMPETENT AND THE DWP PERPETRATES A CONTINUED COVERUP 👉 READ / SHARE: Two years ago, I began a series of articles in The Epoch Times that exposed the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) as a scandal “far bigger” than the Post Office Horizon debacle. Debbie Abrahams, Richard Tice and Ann Widdecombe, alongside fearless campaigners, warned of its devastating impact—financial ruin, mental anguish, and even suicides among paying parents crushed by a rogue system. Yet, here we are in 2025, and what’s changed? Nothing meaningful. Why is the gov still dragging its feet on a crisis that’s tearing families apart? 👉 My articles laid bare a CMS riddled with failures: inaccurate assessments, inflated salaries, and draconian enforcement like asset seizures and imprisonment, often without due process. Campaigners like Noel Willcox called it “extortion,” pointing to a 2018 ruling by Judge Greensmith that exposed procedural flaws in liability orders. Parents reported enforcement fees illegally tacked on, yet the DWP dismissed these as mere “mistakes.” Sound familiar? The parallels to the Post Office scandal are chilling. Like Horizon, the CMS operates with a presumption of infallibility, issuing liability orders based on outdated or fabricated data. Paying parents, often falsely labeled “deadbeat dads,” face bailiffs, passport bans, and jail time. The National Audit Office has refused to sign off on CMS financials since 2012 due to inflated collection figures. Why hasn’t this triggered alarm bells? Most damning is the human cost. Brian Hudson’s data, cited in all my articles, showed paying parents in arrears have a mortality rate 14.28 times the national average, with 93.1% of “excess deaths” linked to CMS pressure. Labour MP Debbie Abrahams raised suicides in Parliament, yet the DWP denies any causal link. How many more lives must be lost before this is treated as the crisis it is? The Tory government’s response? A 2023 consultation promised reforms: scrapping the £20 application fee (done in Feb 2024), speeding up enforcement with administrative liability orders (ALOs), and tweaking domestic abuse protections. But these are Band-Aids on a broken system. ALOs, meant to bypass courts, risk further eroding due process, as Families Need Fathers warned in 2024, likening it to the Post Office’s “self-investigations.” A 2023 High Court case saw single mothers challenge CMS delays, but the judge ruled the failures weren’t unlawful—just “occasional missteps.” Meanwhile, 60% of new CMS users report domestic abuse, yet the system fails to prioritize their cases or protect them from economic abuse. The Child Support (Domestic Abuse) Act 2023 passed, but secondary legislation is still pending. Why the delay? The CMS manages £1.3 billion for 960,000 children, yet enforcement remains sluggish—down from 22 weeks to 6-8 for ALOs, but still too slow for families in need. Paying parents face aggressive tactics, while receiving parents wait endlessly for funds. Both sides suffer, yet the DWP clings to a culture of “denial and incompetence,” as Tice put it. Where’s the accountability? CMS powers to raid bank accounts have been questioned as potentially “unlawful,” with calls for the bill be scrapped. Campaigners like Willcox argue liability orders since 2012 could be illegal, ripe for a class action. Why hasn’t this been tested in higher courts? Why are we still debating reforms when the system’s rot is clear? The Post Office scandal took years of public outcry / a TV drama to force action. Must CMS victims wait for a Netflix series to get justice? The government’s own review admitted modernization is “desperately needed,” yet no real change has been enacted, as Tice urged. Now this isn’t just inaction—it’s potentially life-ending neglect. I’m calling on MPs to act NOW. Investigate CMS failures, audit its financials, pause ALOs. Share your stories below—let’s make this scandal impossible to ignore ✍️

"Judicial Integrity Questioned – Did HHJ Gargan Really Write This Order?" This letter has been formally submitted to the LCJ and Attorney General. It documents my concerns over void orders, procedural dishonesty, and possible judicial ghostwriting. The public deserves to know. The Right Honourable Lady Chief Justice Carr Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL STRICTLY PRIVATE – URGENT CONSTITUTIONAL SUBMISSION For the Personal Attention of Lady Chief Justice Only Subject: Suspected Ghost-writing or Misattribution of 2nd of May 2025 Order sealed 19th of May 2025– Procedural Contradictions and Judicial Inconsistencies Dear Lady Chief Justice Carr, I write again under Section 7(1) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, which vests in your office the responsibility to uphold the independence and integrity of the courts. I now bring to your urgent attention a matter of grave constitutional concern. On 2nd of May 2025, an order was issued in my case (KB-2024-LDS-000034 – KA-2024-LDS-000002) in the name of His Honour Judge Gargan, purporting to dismiss my application to set aside the void order of Mr Justice Lavender dated 21 February 2025. That 21 February order had been issued without notice, on false factual grounds, and during active case management by HHJ Gargan himself. The 2nd of May order attributed to HHJ Gargan is procedurally inconsistent, factually incorrect, and fundamentally incompatible with the judge’s previous orders and directions. This includes: 1. The 3rd of May 2024 Order requiring me to submit my appeal bundle by 14th of June 2024. 2. The 16th of December 2024 extension, granted via the court’s own correspondence, giving me until 17th of January 2025 to file a CPR-compliant bundle. 3. The 21st of January 2025 position statement, in which HHJ Gargan sought proposals for settlement and directions — plainly confirming the appeal was active and procedurally live. 4. The 18th of February 2025 directions order, issued just three days before Mr Justice Lavender intruded and issued a Totally Without Merit certificate under CPR 52 — based on the demonstrably false claim that no Particulars of Claim had been filed. The 2nd of May 2025 order: • Misrepresents the procedural timeline by claiming my Particulars of Claim (dated 13 December 2024) were irrelevant and out of time — despite having been submitted in accordance with HHJ Gargan’s express direction. • Ignores the judge’s prior acknowledgment of procedural compliance, and the bundle he ordered me to prepare. • Labels my application to set aside a void order as an “abuse”, despite it being made under the inherent jurisdiction of the court ex debito justitiae, which exists outside CPR 52. • Threatens me with an Extended Civil Restraint Order despite my documented compliance with all prior judicial directions. Given these contradictions, I am compelled to raise the very real possibility that HHJ Gargan did not author the 2nd of May 2025 order, and that it may have been drafted by a court lawyer, adviser, or administrator without proper judicial scrutiny or signature. The tone, reasoning, and legal content of the order bear no resemblance to the judge’s earlier procedural conduct, and instead resemble standardised boilerplate used to suppress litigation. This amounts to a potential misattribution of judicial authorship — a matter that fundamentally undermines public trust in the judiciary and violates my right to a fair hearing under Article 6 of the ECHR, Clause 29 of the Magna Carta 1297 enactment. Accordingly, I respectfully request: 1. That this matter be urgently placed before you, as President of the Courts and constitutional guardian of judicial independence. 2. That you confirm whether HHJ Gargan personally reviewed, authored, or signed the 2nd of May 2025 order, and if not, that immediate steps be taken to withdraw the order as void ab initio. 3. That you refer the matter to an appropriate oversight body for further inquiry if judicial authorship is uncertain or procedurally compromised. 4. That you confirm whether steps will now be taken to ensure my leapfrog appeal to the Supreme Court can proceed, given the escalating pattern of judicial avoidance, void orders, and executive interference. This matter is no longer merely one of individual injustice — it represents a constitutional breakdown in the chain of judicial accountability. The system appears to be shielding void acts and penalising procedural honesty. I have copied this submission to the Attorney General, as this matter now involves both executive interference and potential judicial misconduct. @JudiciaryUK @JUSTICEhq @GovernmentLegal @instituteforgov @UKHouseofLords @HouseofCommons @alancampbellmp @DWPgovuk @SoniaPoulton @JR4Reform @guardian @Telegraph @BarristerSecret @DailyMirror @gabby_cabby @mensrightsbunny @ThatcmsguyUK @ameliagentleman @GBNEWS @UKSupremeCourt

🚨 BREAKING: Lucy Connolly’s appeal DENIED! Jailed 31 months for a single, deleted tweet—NO evidence it actually incited violence. A grieving mom, torn from her daughter, punished for free speech. This is Starmer’s 2-tier justice: silence dissent, crush families. DISGUSTING!

Yeah the many thousands of families won’t forget you either #LoanChargeScandal

With the elections in both Canada and Australia going to the globalist’s candidates and the UK remaining firmly under the tyranny of their puppet @Keir_Starmer and @UKLabour , this leaves much of the developed world under globalist political control until at least 2029. We are reliant on an increasingly isolated United States and the (love him or loath him) @realDonaldTrump administration to be the bastion of freedom and truth for the world. As we saw last week the lights are literally going out over Europe. Dark times ahead and the darker things get, the nearer we are to their endgame of Agenda 2030. We are in a war and have been for a long time, a spiritual war for the soul of humanity, a war we have to win for benefit of future generations. Time to strap in and buckle up.

We have submitted two detailed documents to the House of Lords Constitution Committee exposing grave concerns:​ ⚖️ After two failed strikeout attempts, the Government Legal Department (GLD) manipulated court venues to move my cases to Leeds — close to a major DWP hub.​ ⚖️ Mr Justice Lavender then usurped HHJ Gargan’s orders, refusing my appeal based on demonstrably false grounds — wrongly claiming Particulars of Claim were missing when clear evidence shows they were filed.​ ⚖️ When asked to correct the mistake, Mr Justice Lavender doubled down, threatening restraint orders instead of correcting the error.​ ⚖️ These orders are void ab initio, based on fatal errors at law.​ ⚖️ Serious concerns arise due to Mr Justice Lavender’s resignation over the Garrick Club scandal, raising public trust issues.​ ⚖️ Sharif Khan (GLD) now seeks to put my surviving Part 8 claim before the same judge after two failed strikeout attempts.​ Access to justice has been systematically hindered at every step:​ Applications ignored.​ Delays multiplied.​ No law firm willing to represent claimants against the DWP on these issues.​ This scandal is far bigger than the Post Office and HMRC Loan Charge scandals — and they know it.​ Thousands of deaths are linked to this wrongdoing.​ Access to justice and representation is being blocked to an identifiable group of people.​ The rule of law demands accountability — not concealment.​ Justice must be restored.​ theguardian.com/uk-news/2024… @JUSTICEhq @joannaccherry @JudiciaryUK @Ashley7Fox @DrNShastriHurst @GeorgeFoulkes @DavidAltonHL @DesmondSwayne @RupertLowe10 @CommissionerHR @ameliagentleman @DWPgovuk @ChambersTrinity @GovernmentLegal @UKSupremeCourt @UKHouseofLords @LibertyHQ @AmnestyUK @fairtrials @JUSTICEhq @DavidPannickKC @ShamiChakrabarti @DoughtyStPublic @JoshuaRozenberg @frasernelson @lewis_goodall @polhomeeditor @ConstitLawGroup @HumanRightsCtte @GoodLawProject @ChrisBryantUK @IanSollom @Andrewwestern @SoniaPoulton @JR4Reform @mensrightsbunny @ThatcmsguyUK @GovernmentLegal #RuleOfLaw #JusticeMatters #Constitution #HouseofLords #Accountability #HumanRights #DueProcess ​#VoidOrders #ConstitutionalCrisis #JusticeForAll #garrackclubscandal