If you follow me please RT this x.com/ShaunLintern/status/60… It doesn't just matter to me, it matters to us all. It's the reason I'm here. Thanks

Derby police… no great surprise. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy8w…

But it’s fine to get angry for a black felon in a different country. Right

Abolishing patient watchdog leaves NHS 'marking own homework', councils warn - BBC News > Healthwatch were useless when I tried to engage them. Even though the issue I raised applied universally across the UK, they refused to get involved. So no big loss? apple.news/AkqjEryDOTk2DKbUU…

Listen when they tell you. “Everyone in the country will have a digital ID” Even if you don’t want one! “This isn’t a heavy handed approach but we will make sure everyone has one” Oh 🤡

No 10 refuses to release Mandelson vetting files Cross-party committee, chaired by Labour peer, says Government has no authority to withhold documents from Parliament The release would finish Starmer if he were not finished already. telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05…

So the British government is forcing X to answer to the Nina Jancowicz class of “external disinformation / hate speech experts” under threats of massive fines and penalties, and there is currently zero diplomatic pushback from the United States over this.

RESIGNATION LETTER TO @AndyBurnhamGM Following my comments yesterday in the media around the huge failures in my opinion of part 4 of @AndyBurnhamGM independent review in Manchester, I am sharing my resignation letter sent to him and his deputy last January 2024, as I have been approached by numerous news outlets for more information. I share it below in full. I always try to give credit where credit is due, and I will remain eternally grateful to @AndyBurnhamGM for instigating the Independent reviews into Op Augusta in Manchester and Op Span in Rochdale. They both confirmed without doubt that all I had said was true and that has been incredibly important to me and survivors as we tried to make sense of all that happened. The final part of the process however was meant to be an “ Assurance Review” and it was meant to deliver assurances that CURRENT practises in @gmpolice regarding their treatment of vulnerable victims of sexual abuse were now fit for purpose, based on current evidence. Instead what happened in this 4th part of the review was not honest, transparent, or in any way fit for purpose in my opinion. It’s a complex subject matter and there’s an awful lot to cover, but this letter below which I sent to @AndyBurnhamGM last January explains some of it, especially why I and @TMOFCharity resigned from a process in stage 4 that was little more than a tick box exercise. Even the two independent professionals who had carried out the previous 3 parts resigned, unwilling to put their names to something they knew was not in fact wanting to speak the truth. What I saw in Mr Burnham and @gmpolice was a willingness to say there had been huge “failures in the past” but when looking at action around failures still going on today, there truly was no “duty of candour” on display! Instead they turned away. Again. Once again the voices of those victims and survivors whose voices SHOULD have been front and centre of this report were totally silenced and blocked out of the “Assurance review” making it worthless. The establishment again “marking its own homework”. Just Like in @IICSAVSCP the 7 year statutory national enquiry for which we are currently taking this government to a Judicial Review, like in Oldham and in so many other cases throughout the country over the last 3 decades. So there is a willingness to admit past failures as that can no longer be denied, but there’s still a huge avoidance of addressing what’s still going wrong today. In other words continuing to turn away when what our country (and victims) need is a hard scrutiny at the problems TODAY, based on real life experiences of survivors and not a cover up yet again from those at the top of our PUBLIC institutions whose duty it is to act in my opinion. Our public servants, must begin to show courage, integrity, honesty, and bravery, something we have not seen in decades. And that’s has to change!!

A year and a half on, I haven’t changed my mind.

ICC Judge Nicolas Guillou @nicopaulmichel has revealed that he is currently unable to use his bank cards even on European soil. The reason? He is one of the judges who issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, leading the United States to slap him

When it looks like Labour might lose Wales, you know for sure that the Labour Party isn’t really the Labour Party any more.

I’m trying to imagine Angela Rayner as PM, in a meeting with Putin… my head won’t let me. It’s just a step too far, even by current, farcical political standards.

Natural con-trails? They’re certainly not like the ones I spent hours staring at a as a kid. Those never turned into clouds and hung around for hours.

I am pleased to have Jacob Rees-Mogg’s support for my legal action against an administrative body related to Parliament - my argument is aimed at empowering elected MPs over unelected officials. On Tuesday 17 March my Barrister, Christopher Newman, and I were in the Administrative Court in London at a hearing in front of High Court Judge Martin Chamberlain. It is a significant case for the power of parliament, and therefore the power of the voters. As the MP for Great Yarmouth, I am seeking to challenge the legality of the processes of the ‘Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme’, also known as the ICGS - importantly, it is entirely legally separate from Parliament. The scheme’s genesis is driven by the ‘Me Too’ movement in 2018. The ICGS are seeking to use the doctrine of ‘Parliamentary Privilege’ to assert that they are, in effect, beyond the scrutiny of the law. Parliamentary privilege exists to allow MPs to do our job away from legal threats, it does not exist to protect bureaucratic bodies. As Jacob Rees-Mogg, former Leader of the House of Commons, points out in his analysis: “As the ICGS is independent, it cannot in its workings be a Commons body, as it would then not be independent. It is really very straightforward and Rupert Lowe seems to be right." This is arguably the most significant constitutional case in years with the ICGS now arguing the polar opposite of the position the state took in the case of R v Chaytor where MPs unsuccessfully tried to use Parliamentary Privilege to avoid prosecution for abuse of expense claims. ICGS staff are not legally qualified, and this administrative body is outside the orbit of the Chamber and has no link to MPs. It has not reported to a Parliamentary Committee of MPs since 2020 when all links were severed and a panel was inserted. It is our argument that this body cannot claim to be above the law - it is not right that a bureaucratic body separate from Parliament is attempting to use parliamentary privilege, designed for elected politicians, to avoid reasonable scrutiny. Rees-Mogg ends his article: “Thus if Lowe wins, he will not have harmed Parliament, but defended it. For through cowardice we – and I was an MP at the time – abdicated our privileged responsibility and gave it to unelected boffins, who are not so much better than elected politicians after all, but much harder to eject.” We expect a Judgment after Easter, around 14 April 2026. For anyone interested, please find below links to the relevant Court documents and media coverage: Our skeleton argument. drive.proton.me/urls/C66EX75… Jacobs Rees-Mogg article published - ‘Rupert Lowe and Parliamentary Privilege’. letters.jacobreesmogg.com/p/…

California legislators are trying to make investigating fraud illegal

So to use the @SkyNews app, you now have to create an account? I should’ve stopped reading their bullshit years ago really, so I suppose this is as good a time as any.

Yes. BUT I caveat that by saying the civil service will oppose it and I’m sure there would be years worth of legal wrangling. Parliament is sovereign but the civil service run rings around it.

🚨 this is so important to understand. We will be ‘back in the EU” because unelected quangos rule the UK, it’s why we have over 600 of them To avoid scrutiny or even public knowledge over deals with the EU, Starmer plans to introduce just one piece of legislation. This acts as a framework, and within it hundreds of new EU aligned rules can be rolled out without a vote in Parliament or proper scrutiny. New rules for net zero, food, energy and manufacturing can simply be added to statute by a mechanism called a statutory instrument. It doesn’t involve you and you won’t get a choice or a say. Rule by quango isn’t democracy it’s like dictatorship and we must end it! 🚨

🦔A researcher invented a fake eye condition called bixonimania, uploaded two obviously fraudulent papers about it to an academic server, and watched major AI systems present it as real medicine within weeks. The fake papers thanked Starfleet Academy, cited funding from the Professor Sideshow Bob Foundation and the University of Fellowship of the Ring, and stated mid-paper that the entire thing was made up. Google's Gemini told users it was caused by blue light. Perplexity cited its prevalence at one in 90,000 people. ChatGPT advised users whether their symptoms matched. The fake research was then cited in a peer-reviewed journal that only retracted it after Nature contacted the publisher. My Take The researcher made the papers as obviously fake as possible on purpose. The AI systems didn't catch it. Neither did the human researchers who cited it in real journals, which means people are feeding AI-generated references into their work without reading what they're actually citing. I've covered the FDA using AI for drug review, the NYC hospital CEO ready to replace radiologists, and ChatGPT Health launching this year. All of that is happening in the same environment where a condition funded by a Simpsons character and endorsed by the crew of the Enterprise was being presented as emerging medical consensus. The people making these deployment decisions seem to believe the pipeline from research to AI to patient is more supervised than it actually is. This experiment suggests it isn't supervised much at all. Hedgie🤗 nature.com/articles/d41586-0…

You tried to paint me as a pervert for exposing fraud, and as a result radical leftists started trying to dox me and send death threats, wanting to kill me. Now you are taking credit for “leading the charge” on the fraud. Are you serious? You are the fraud.

I can only imagine the confusion of future historians studying 2026 style propaganda, whilst we teetered on the brink of world war: “I’m sorry..? Lego movies??”