In with the future-proof @NervosNetwork $CKB 🏋️‍♂️✝️🦍🔥🦖Blockchain Evolution RunCKB @Bitcoin @ethereum @Cardano @UtxoAlliance💯

🔥🔥🔥

$CKB @NervosNetwork @Bitcoin Blockchains 🪽RunCKB🪽

not a crime, not a lie

Meet Liquid Cells. A pooled, non-custodial micropayment protocol on #CKB: validity proofs mean the operator can't steal or inflate, and every user can force-exit from L1 alone. It's experimentL. We want it stress-tested. Come argue with us 👇 bit.ly/4emYvqJ

A community developer @teaplusplus11 built a quantum resistant wallet on CKB using SPHINCS . They did it without needing a protocol change, a consensus vote, or a hard fork. That's what crypto agility looks like in production, and it's why CKB will still be running long after today's algorithms are obsolete.

A quick read on where the quantum migration conversation sits right now What changed A Google Quantum AI paper published on March 31, 2026 significantly lowered the estimated resources needed to break secp256k1, the elliptic curve behind Bitcoin and Ethereum signatures. The estimate dropped to roughly 1,200 logical qubits, or under 500,000 physical qubits on a superconducting machine, which is about 20x lower than previous estimates. Where the timeline sits Justin Drake, Ethereum Foundation researcher and co-author of the paper, puts the odds at at least 10% that a quantum computer can recover an ECC-based private key from an exposed public key by 2030. 50% that Q-Day arrives by 2032. That makes the early 2030s the honest reference point, albeit with wide margins. Why this matters today “Harvest now, decrypt later” is the nearer concern. Adversaries do not need to wait for the hardware to exist. They can collect exposed public keys and encrypted data today, then attack them once quantum hardware catches up. Any public key already exposed onchain, i.e., reused addresses, P2PK and other legacy outputs, etc., becomes part of that calculation. Where CKB sits CKB is one of the few, if not the only genuinely “quantum ready” blockchains. Its flexible and cryptographically agnostic and agile architecture allows developers to permissionlessly deploy any post quantum signature scheme. A SPHINCS scheme is already deployed, meaning users can already migrate their assets to quantum resistant addresses using the Quantum Purse wallet.

What is crypto agility? The ability of a system to swap its cryptographic algorithms without disrupting how it runs. Past cryptographic transitions have taken decades. DES took 23 years to give way to AES, and SHA-1 retirement still isn't complete. Crypto agility is what makes the next transition faster, and CKB is the only blockchain built this way.

Introducing: Build on CKB! With the rapid growth of our CKBuilders programme, we've been devising new offerings to accommodate developers who are new to CKB and interested in learning. We now have the Build on CKB telegram channel for new developers to participate in weekly competitions to win prizes, receive devrel support, participate in peer learning, and get pre-hackathon preparation and support! We recently completed our first Build on CKB campaign, with 8 new developers all receiving CKB prizes! If you missed out, don't worry! We have a new campaign live now. Check it out on CKBoost: ckboost.netlify.app/campaign…

NIST published its final crypto agility guidance in December 2025. The message is clear: in the post-quantum era, systems must be able to change their cryptography without breaking. CKB was built for this from day one. While most blockchains are locked into protocol-level cryptographic assumptions, CKB is designed to adapt. That difference matters. Follow us over the coming days to learn why.

A - tier @NervosNetwork $CKB blockchains! @Bitcoin RunCKB 💯🥷🏿

Here's a fun little exercise for crypto bros: Open the quantumtracker.org/ website by the legends @tectonicxyz Select "Blockchains" in the sidebar. Sort by "Tier." Notice who sits at the top with the most green check marks :) Cheers 🍻

What’s happening with CKB — and why it matters The last few days for Nervos Network may look quiet in terms of price action — but strategically, things are getting interesting. Yes, the market remains under pressure. Trading volumes aren’t explosive. There’s no loud hype cycle. But look deeper. In recent days: • Stronger focus on DAO governance — the ecosystem is becoming more decentralized. • Continued work on cross-chain interoperability. • Ongoing development in BTCFi and Layer-2 solutions. • The team keeps building — not chasing short-term headlines. These aren’t pump-driven announcements. This is infrastructure. Periods of “silence” are often accumulation phases — when weak hands exit and long-term players position themselves. CKB isn’t about quick hype. It’s about architecture, resilience, and long-term infrastructure. The real question isn’t what happened in 3 days. It’s where the ecosystem will be in 2–3 years. #CKB #NervosNetwork #BTCFi #Layer2 #Web3 #Blockchain #Crypto #BuildInPublic #LongTermVision

Straight from @Coinbase’s April paper on quantum computing and blockchains. 👇 “Crypto-agility is a highly recommended practice in general [...] even more so in the context of PQC.” Now guess which chains were designed to switch cryptographic algorithms without disrupting operations🧠 Hint: there’s only one.

So you’re a crypto investor. Markets are cooked, everything’s a scam, everything’s a ponzi, everyone needs better marketing, institutional adoption. Are they? Do they? Or Have these mystical blockchain devs actually built networks you can build on? It’s the last one with $CKB

CKB Has No Plan — But We Do. Our previous posts about roadmaps generated some controversy. We’re grateful to have your attention. Because this distinction matters. CKB doesn’t have a roadmap because it is public infrastructure, not a product operated by a company. The goal of any serious blockchain is not endless reinvention. It is to become a stable, secure, and predictable infrastructure that others can build on for decades. That said, CKBA absolutely has plans. CKBA exists to coordinate stakeholders and grow the CKB ecosystem across the areas that matter most. That means organized work to attract builders, identify use cases, improve developer onboarding, fund ecosystem initiatives, pursue partnerships, clearly communicate CKB’s value, and actively engage the teams, companies, and communities that can drive real usage on the network. Having reorganized and unified several teams under a single structure puts us in a stronger position than ever to execute on these goals. A ton of work is already underway, especially on the Fiber front: improving the stack and documentation, advancing Lightning interoperability and liquidity management, and identifying and removing blockers for adoption. Work is also ongoing on the design and implementation of the DAO's on-chain treasury and voting mechanisms. And while there are many other initiatives in the pipeline that we’ll share when the time is right, there’s one that demands immediate attention 👇 Three months ago, Google Quantum AI published a bombshell paper showing that quantum attacks against secp256k1—the elliptic curve behind the signatures used by most blockchains—may require far fewer resources than previously estimated. In simple terms, the paper made the quantum threat to cryptocurrencies harder to ignore. The industry conversation that followed was, as expected, hard to miss — and yet it missed CKB. No mention in the paper, no mention in the con im versations on X and various forums, no mention anywhere. To put it bluntly, this is a huge communication failure on our part. CKB is the only cryptographically agile blockchain in existence, and therefore one of the few that’s already quantum ready. It’s the only chain where devs can bring new post-quantum signature schemes permissionlessly. No need for soft or hard forks. No need to pick a single PQ scheme and bake it in as a precompile. CKB is the only chain that can switch between different crypto primitives without disrupting operations or requiring significant infrastructure redesign. It’s the true embodiment of crypto-agility — yet barely anyone was aware of it. So, our first course of action on the communication front is to remedy that. We’ll run a comprehensive marketing campaign that’ll put CKB at the forefront of the Quantum x Blockchain discussion and position it as one of the few projects with a future-proof solution. And we want all of you involved. If you care about CKB and want to help push this forward, reach out. If you’re a developer, researcher, writer, designer, translator, community organizer, content creator, or just someone willing to help amplify the message, we want to hear from you. This campaign should not be about what CKBA has to say. It should be about making CKB impossible to ignore. We’ll be opening channels for community participation soon. In the meantime, reply here, DM us, or join the discussion on Nervos Talk.

Membership isn't the only way to participate in CKB. ckba.build now has a general enquiry form. Questions about CKB, General Member interest, or anything else for the team to know. We read every one 👉 ckba.build/contact

In our last post, we covered the idea of a roadmap for CKB, and made clear that in many ways, the idea of a roadmap is antithetical to blockchains. Blockchains, if designed correctly, strive toward the opposite: ossification. For the uninitiated, ossification, in the blockchain context, refers to the process by which a protocol’s foundational rules become exceptionally resistant to change, ensuring ultimate stability, security, and predictability. It represents the maturation of a decentralized network from experimental technology to a rigid digital institution. A classic example of this from outside our industry would be the TCP/IP protocols that govern the internet. They have remained fundamentally unchanged for over 40 years. And that stability is precisely why the internet became what it is today. Because TCP/IP remained boring, predictable, and stable, billions of devices, applications, companies, and networks could coordinate around the same basic assumptions without asking anyone for permission. Email, streaming, messaging, cloud computing, social networks, and everything else evolved above the protocol—not because the base layer kept reinventing itself, but because it stopped changing enough for the world to build on top of it. That is the goal of public infrastructure: to remain simple, stable, predictable, and open and accessible. CKB is designed with this insight in mind: it remains conservative at the protocol layer, and optimizes for flexibility at the application layer.

As you near the bottom of the extensive positioning paper you run into a little ditty on governance, relevant to recent events. Planning 🙌 GG Nervos Network team.

What is $CKB ? @NervosNetwork Common Knowledge Base (CKB) is a secure, preservation-focused #Layer1 "store of assets" and trust root. Emphasizes long-term state preservation, security, and decentralization via #PoW generalized #UTXO model.