FAANG SWE & AI realist. Honest takes on tech, finance, AI tools, and engineering life.

Joined March 2026
85 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
I think “software is solved” splits into two levels, and the second one is much harder. 1. Local level: AI writes individual classes, functions, tests, and small features accurately and fast. No one’s writing code en masse by hand anymore. ← We’re basically here. 2. Macro level: shipping and running big real-world systems or full SaaS products that paying customers depend on 24/7. The jump from 1 to 2 is brutal because 90% accurate isn’t good enough. At scale you need near-perfect reliability, observability, security, and the ability to evolve the system without it collapsing. You also need someone to take real liability when things go wrong. “AI did it” doesn’t fly with customers or regulators. Production edge cases, integration messes, architecture trade-offs, and long-term ownership still demand real human judgment.
Replying to @BenjaminDEKR
Seems like software has been solved for the 6th time this year already.
4
458
In case you're just catching up, there was a crazy GitHub outage where pull requests were being merged incorrectly. Sounds like a nightmare. Does it seem like these incidents are becoming more common?
2
59
Tim Cook’s best Apple innovation:
1
211
Hardware is the new software
John Ternus bio: Hardware
1
2
402
🚨 NEW: X posting guidelines for Claude 4.7 Must be one of the following with no exceptions: - “My limit was hit after saying ‘hi’” - “DAE think 4.7 is worse than 4.6?” (Make sure to not have tried 4.7 at all before posting) - “Codex is better than Claude now” (only ever used Codex) Anyone got any more?
1
3
305
Are we finally ready to have this conversation yet? Are we hitting a dead end?
Replying to @paraschopra
Bruh this is even worse. These models are not actually thinking
2
517
Instant nuanced takes on Claude Opus 4.7 vs 4.6 crack me up. Same agents, same crazy complex workflows, huge surface area… yet everyone instantly knows if 4.7 is ‘insanely good’ or if 4.6 was superior lol 😂
3
223
“Is it just me or did Claude opus 4.7 …”

ALT Mean Girls Shut Up GIF

4
155
This man laid the foundation for modern AI agents... and you don't even know his name?
Replying to @ASpittel
It's honestly been a renaissance for legacy Linux features: grep, find, tmux, sed. It shows how simple and well thought out these tools were in their day.
4
257
This hot take seemed to have struck a chord. The new Claude Code desktop is slick on the surface, but it's mostly orchestration theater. Real value is still in the raw model plus deep model-specific integrations like Claude Code. They literally designed it based on the model during training and tweaked things as they went along. Everything else (GUI clients, drag-and-drop panes, side chats, multi-agent swarms, etc.) gets commoditized in weeks since anyone can slap together a wrapper with the API. Moats aren't in polished apps anymore. They're in taste (I know this is a meme but it’s true), closed research, network effects, marketing, and whatever regulatory edge they can grab. Ship model improvements faster and improve reliability of shipping slop. The community can take care of the rest.
Replying to @ecommerceshares
Hot take: I think everything except the raw underlying model and Claude code is slop
1
7
2,087
This is a top signal
I'm increasingly convinced that there is never going to be a major crash again. The market is so divorced from the "real" economy that 90% of the population could be eating dirt and the S&P would still be noting record gains.
3
628
1/5
A lot of the loud “quit your job and build your own startup” voices on X have a built-in bias. Most of their products are B2B SaaS tools made for other aspiring startup founders like us. It’s the modern picks and shovels play in the gold rush. But here’s the thing: 🧵
2
4
361
5/5 Poll: Does the “everyone should build a startup” advice on X feel biased by incentives? If you’re still working a job and thinking about building later, what’s holding you back or what are you considering? Drop it below 👇 Stay aware of whose incentives you’re hearing. No pressure to rush.
1
2
162
Poll: Does the “everyone should build a startup” advice on X feel biased by incentives?
0% Yes, it’s an echo chamber
0% Somewhat but still useful
0% No, mostly genuine
0% Other (reply)
0 votes • Final results
1
106
1/8 LeetCode solutions are straight-up outdated in 2026💻 Old routine: pick problem - grind for 45 mins - fail - open solution tab - stare at cryptic code with single-letter variables and zero comments. My brute force never looked anything like theirs. I'd just copy it and still not really understand.

ALT Spongebob Think GIF

1
2
468
7/8 - "Compare my solution to the optimal one and show the logical steps between them" - "What edge cases am I missing and why do they matter?" - "How would this break in a real interview?" Pro move: Keep one long chat open with the same AI across multiple problems. Tell it once: "Act as my algorithms tutor - always use clear names, explain the why first, and trace examples when I ask." It starts to learn how you think.
1
1
93
8/8 This beats grinding solution tabs by a mile. You build real intuition instead of fragile memorization. 🚀 Anyone else using AI like this for LeetCode instead of just copying answers? What's your go-to prompt or a problem where it helped you finally "get" it? Drop it below 👇
1
1
90