The timing is very questionable at best. Coaches, universities, and athletic departments have spent a lot of money recruiting and building relationships for this year’s recruiting cycle. Having team rosters potentially ripped apart at the last minute is upsetting, especially since we have been operating under the status quo. The game has grown internationally due to the success of international players in college basketball. College basketball is also probably the most talent-rich it has been since the 90s. Why not continue advancing the game's popularity by having the best players in the world in that age group play in it?
I appreciate the dialogue, and I believe it has helped provide some clarity to the basketball community.
I understand your frustration about timing, but the pace of change in college athletics is moving faster than ever and the NCAA needs to start somewhere.
Further, the NCAA presumably is taking the position it is applying preexisting rules — most notably, (1) the “actual and necessary expenses” requirement, and (2) the concept of counting each season of international play against a player’s NCAA’s eligibility clock (currently, five years to play four seasons subject to some exceptions).
In any event, I don’t think the NCAA’s application of its eligibility rules will be as draconian as some suggest.
To the extent an incoming prospect does not get cleared by the NCAA, I predict the outcome to be tethered to preexisting rules — most commonly, counting each season of international play against a player’s NCAA eligibility clock.