There is already a host of research that "articulates concrete scenarios" of AI harm, so it really begs the question as to why these two don't consider any of that work valid that they think there is still "fog and uncertainty" 🤔
Had a great conversation with Yoshua Bengio. Both of us agreed that a good step forward for AI risk is to articulate the concrete scenarios where AI can lead to significant harm. More to come, and looking forward to continuing the conversation!