I’ve stopped using the “AI as junior associate” framing. While in the early days of generative AI, it occasionally helped someone conceptualize the “eager but uniformed” aspect, actual AI uses in law and actual AI capabilities make the analogy less and less apt.
But as an “intelligence” that works under our direction, we might still want to call it an Associate (as opposed to calling it a software tool we use). That’s fine, so long as we don’t conflate understanding along with terminology.