I’m sure we all remember the Alex Salmond criminal trial and its outcome: a full acquittal on every charge. I mention it for a reason. Even though Salmond was found not guilty, he was in genuine danger of being convicted regardless of the evidence he presented.
His defence was exceptionally strong — strong enough to withstand the pressure — but the wider legal environment in Scotland at the time made the risk far greater than most people realised.
For years, the Scottish Government had been pursuing policies aimed at increasing conviction rates in sexual‑offence cases. This created a climate in which the judiciary was expected to “deliver results,” and judges were under pressure to interpret the law in ways that favoured complainers. In practice, this meant that evidence from accused men was often restricted or excluded, while the Crown’s narrative was given greater freedom.
A key part of this was the way Scottish courts used sections 274 and 275. These provisions were intended to regulate sensitive evidence — but they were increasingly applied in a way that tilted the playing field, limiting what the defence could present to a jury. Even though Salmond was ultimately cleared, the structure of the system meant that things could easily have gone very differently.
The seriousness of this problem has now been confirmed at the highest level. In November 2025, the UK Supreme Court ruled in Keir and Daly v HM Advocate that Scotland’s practice of excluding relevant defence evidence on common‑law “relevance” grounds breached the right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Court stated plainly that “no society governed in accordance with the rule of law can tolerate the conviction and punishment of the innocent.”
This ruling exposes just how far the system had drifted. The Law Society of Scotland and the Faculty of Advocates intervened in the case to warn that the balance between protecting complainers and ensuring a fair defence had been lost — and the Supreme Court agreed.
Even though the individual appeals in Keir and Daly were dismissed, the constitutional principle is now beyond dispute: the way Scottish courts handled sexual‑offence evidence for more than a decade was unlawful and risked wrongful convictions.
That is why I hope you’ll watch the video. Our legal system is in a far worse state than many of us realised, and the implications of this ruling are only beginning to unfold.
youtube.com/watch?v=T4BGFGAp…
Where are the photos/video of these , so called, 'New Scots' with their flags, banners, Scotland tops?? I've seen more pics/video from folks abroad, who want to associate/be Scottish.
I’ve been called an adopted son of Scotland, something I don’t take lightly.
I never thought I’d call upon its powers but if the Scots approve, might the army retweet? If Twitter can send me to the Cup, it can send one of ours home.
It has been reported that a 125-decibel sound level was recorded during Flower of Scotland, which makes it the loudest noise at a World Cup tournament ever 🏴 👇
𝘐𝘯 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 @SPARScotland
𝘐𝘔𝘈𝘎𝘌: 𝘈𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘸 𝘔𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘯/𝘗𝘈 𝘞𝘪𝘳𝘦
A group of Scots in a Boston Airbnb went viral after they were filmed playing the bagpipes last week at 6:30am
Now, with a win under Scotland's belt, they tell @jamesmatthewsky about the love they've received - including doughnuts and 12 bottles of whisky
trib.al/WkOkffD
Did you know. The Proclaimers were sacked from their jobs as groundsmen at Hibernian FC in 1988 because the grass on the pitch was always far too long. The twins blamed B&Q.
They went to Bathgate, no mower. Linwood, no mower. Irvine, no mower 🎶 😁
Congratulations to Scotland. They maybe the only nation on Earth to be completely drunk today but you have to hand it to them. They have the best national anthem bar none.
Football, eh? Enough to make a grown man in a kilt cry.
Years of exile from international football’s greatest stage come to an end for Scotland. This was also just the 5th time Scotland have won a match at a World Cup. And this is the emotion of that victory. @itvnews
Peter A Bell
"Scotland has too many ninety-minute patriots whose nationalist outpourings are expressed only at major sporting events."
peterabell.substack.com/p/in…