Yes, my opinion has changed for sure! It actually changed after the trial, I only came to terms with my realizations and findings one day before Karen sued the CW witnesses. I had been going down some rabbit holes for a few weeks, asking lots of questions, and looking into everything that I thought I knew that made the CW witnesses “guilty,” and the more I looked, the more I realized that I had been intentionally misled. But what REALLY fully solidified everything for me was the realization that the 8:22am dash cam footage was accurate, and that Sgt Barros confirmed on the stand that it was representative of what he saw when they seized the car in Dighton. So, if the taillight was broken out at 8:22am, and we have a trustworthy police officer telling us that that footage is not manipulated in any way, then how could anyone believe that taillight pieces were broken off in the Sally Port and planted in the yard? If the taillight lens was broken out at that time, early morning on 1/29/22, then where was it? Well, we know now, it was at 34 Fairview. And it’s no coincidence that the taillight looks quite similar at 8:22am as it does in the SP, from the same angle. I think it was really easy to get caught up in him saying “absolutely not” because I know I did too, at the time. If you any FKR, they’ll tell you that Barros confirmed the taillight *didn’t* look the same. But all he *actually* confirmed is that the taillight didn’t look the same when he saw it caked in snow, versus NOT caked in snow. Because… DUH! It obviously wouldn’t look the same. It was a real slick trick by AJ, and it obviously worked, because it seems like the entirety of FKR missed the fact that Barros confirmed that it was completely impossible for taillight to have been planted.

If you ever feel stupid, just remember this is Peter Murphy, posting on FKR Facebook, about why they continue to "stand out" in public looking like sundowning boomers. The astute among you will note that Helena Rafferty was not, in fact, chief at the time stated.

Presented without comment

If you are looking in dread and fear at your own hateful and vile conversations with wee aids being brought to light, take a moment to think how the innocent witnesses have felt for several years. Then GFY.

NOT THAT BUTTON, MAX!

Anyone buying the story that mere sent a pornographic video to a minor child using her own phone number? Cause I'm absolutely not buying it.

After listening to Grant's spaces, I think I've come up with a simpler org chart than his to illustrate who Kate is connected to.

Grant right now:

Grant's new strategy is a bold one, Cotton. Rant like an unhinged maniac on a honey comb hideout space, to "upset" the trolls, whose primary goal in life is to get Grant ranting like an unhinged maniac. Let's see how this works for him.

Listening to Grant's unhinged decompensation live is wild, but I think the poor lad needs an intervention, before he hurts himself in his confusion.

Per Grant's unhinged conversation with tinkle tawm derosier, notable purveyor of lightly used sex toys, 80% of the population of Mass. is involved in this coverup, and .03% of the Australian population. The only thing he hasn't explained is _why_.

Anyone who has ever had to submit videos to court knows there is a process involved, in which you show or transcribe the relevant portion, and then submit that, ALONG WITH the whole video (so it can be seen in context). Today we have a whole lot of idiots who think that is bad.

🚨🚨MY WORD! we have just discovered that when Grant is out buying pre rolled "medicine", @MafiaMasshole sneaks into his room via shape shifting through a drain pipe, and messes it up! DEVELOPING! 🚨🚨 My Goodness!!

AHAHAHAHA. @GrantSmithEllis blocked me because the truth really interferes with his THC soaked insane narratives. and another one down, another one down, another one bites the dust.

If true, this is a serious ethics violation and his pro hac vice should be revoked. Ultimately it's Whiskey Tim @BradlLawPC on the hook. Way to go @Bederowlaw. No way to put the toothpaste back in the tube on this one.

Dawww.. did lil hardass "sephiroth" get found and deleted his account and ran? Did you think better of what you said now that there's a face to put to the name? Poor lil tink tink. Lil fella talked a load of smack from behind a weeb avatar.

fascinating. If you block Grant, he automatically assumes that's confirmation of his latest batshit conspiracy post. Use your powers for good, folks, not chaos.

So L Gaetani claimed I was at some party? That explains Grant's hare brained nonsense.

Fun fact.. privilege only exists between the lawyer and their client. There is no expectation of privilege between either client or lawyer and random bar floozy you brought along to the meeting to show off. That is all, and stuff.