The Covenant of Jesus Christ.

Joined February 2026
16 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Day #8 of asking to the Dispos and "Christian Zionists" Where does the Holocaust fit into your warped and corrupted theology?
Day #7 of asking to the Dispos and "Christian Zionists" Where does the Holocaust fit into your warped and corrupted theology?
1
2
77
Covenant Truth retweeted
Does Israel have "a right to exist?" The answer is an emphatic NO, and I'll explain why. For starters, the question itself is manipulative and means one of two things: (A) The first is that the question means they want something from you. This is the most common. If you concede that yes, Israel has a right to exist, it will be followed by a list of things they need to actualize that right. If Israel has a right to exist, they need our bombs. They need our tax dollars. They need our national resources. They need our veto power at the U.N. Their so-called "right to exist" will require something from us for the right to be conferred. Notice that Americans never go around asking other nations if we have a right to exist. That's because we're not trying to bilk them out of anything. (B) The second is that the question is asked so that, if we answer in the affirmative, it means we must overlook or excuse whatever horrendous human rights abuse, illegal activity, or immoral action they want to undertake (or already have) - even if it is to the detriment of the United States. This strategy requires Israel to label everything an existential crisis, with Israel's future existence hanging in the balance. Once something becomes existential, then ethics don't matter. If this is an extinction-level event, then it's not the time to worry about the morality of a matter. Kill women and children? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Murder nine civilian non-combatants for every one terrorist? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Double-tap missile targets, killing aid workers? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Ethnic cleansing in Gaza? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Bomb churches? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Target journalists? Yes, because Israel has the right to exist. Blow up oil fields? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Violate international law? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Because nothing is as important as existing, it's the perfect Get-Out-Of-Having-a-Conscience Free Card for a Desert War Cult that wants to act however it wants with impunity. But there's another reason the question is illegitimate. It's wrongfully open-ended. It's not a complete question. No nation on Earth has a unilateral "right to exist" without qualification; not even the United States. There's got to be an IF on the end of it. Does Israel have a right to exist...if it requires the rest of the world to live on the brink of WWIII? No. Does Israel have a right to exist if it means bankrupting the United States to guarantee its security? No. Does Israel have the right to exist if it means genocide of its neighbors? No. Does Israel have a right to exist if it's acting in constant violation of international law? No. The moment a nation has an unqualified "right to exist" is the moment it can get away with whatever it wants, behave in a way that's detrimental to every other nation on Earth, and can even demand you help facilitating its existence because, after all, it has a "right" to it. Next, logically, we cannot affirm Israel's unilateral "right to exist" over and against the rights of other nations to exist. God Almighty forbids favoritism. He's not a respecter of persons (the Bible says this three times, each time in reference to Jews), and we're forbidden from showing partiality on account of their alleged genetic ancestry. God hates this. It's a sin. If we affirm Israel's "right to exist, " we must by the same measure affirm the right of Iran to exist. And Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Libya, Lebanon, Jordan, the UAE, Iraq, Syria, et al. And I don't feel like it, do you? Sorry. Step out of line, and you get smoked. That goes for Israel, just like it goes for Iran. Further, Israel most emphatically does NOT have a divine right to exist. The Abrahamic Promise of Genesis 12:3 is about Christ, and the recipients, or heirs of that promise, are Christians exclusively. Those who have faith in Jesus are the “heirs of the promise” (Galatians 3:29). The Seed referenced in the promise is Christ, according to Paul, and he very explicitly says that it’s NOT Jews (Galatians 3:16). There is no Covenant blessing or promise obtainable or retainable outside of Christ (2 Corinthians 2:10). Romans 9 says that Jews who reject Christ do not belong to Israel (Romans 9:6-8). Romans 11 says that Jews who reject Christ have been rejected by God and they’ve been broken off from Abraham (Romans 11:17–20). Whatever the Dispensationalists claim in the novel eschatology about the future, doesn't change the fact that they are - as it stands now - cut off from the promises of God until at such time they stop persisting in unbelief. Israel does not have the right to exist on account of an ancient ancestral land deed. Let's presume for a moment that most Israelis aren't more European than they are Middle Eastern. Let's pretend they're more Semitic than the Palestinians who've lived there continually for thousands of years (they aren't). It wouldn't matter if it were true. That's not how the world works. Americans don't have to give back Florida to the Seminole. My ancestors came from the British Isles, but I don't have the right to Buckingham Palace. The land known as Palestine has been inhabited by dozens and DOZENS of people groups over the millennia. Every nation on Earth has previously been inhabited by different people groups than those who live there now. And that means exactly nothing. And if you want to quote the Bible at this point, refer back to the last one. If we're playing by Biblical rules, Palestine belongs to Christ, which means it should be transferred to those who are in Christ, at which point, the Church would happily take it. And finally, it would be foolish and irresponsible for any serious person to answer "Does Israel have a right to exist" in the affirmative, knowing what the Zionists mean when they say "Israel." In their head, they don't mean the strip of land we call Israel. They mean Greater Israel (which is why they refer to the land held by other nations as Judea, or Samaria, or Greater Israel). Their entire national history has been one ambitious land grab after another. Their goal is to occupy practically the entire Middle East, a region currently home to 310 million Muslims. No, we don't want WWIII, thank you very much. And we're not going to affirm your right to exist there. As Christians, there's a bonus reason we should answer that question in the negative. We should be reminded that the current global consensus is that no Christian ethnostate should exist on this planet. That's out of the question for every major international ruling body on Earth. So in a world in which Christians are not allowed to have a Christian ethnostate, there's no good reason we should support a Jewish one. Jesus Christ is the King of Kings. We should not support the "right to exist" of a nation that rejects Jesus in their national charter, which Israel matter-of-factly does. Their entire identity is founded upon their rejection of Jesus as Lord. They ban Jews who believe in Christ from migrating to Israel. They ban public Christian evangelism. They pull the broadcast licenses of Christian TV and radio if they provide programming directed at evangelizing Jews. They're hostile to the indigenous church. They discriminate against Christian in a thousand different ways, none of them secretly. Any Christian who would support the right of a nation to exist that is THAT hostile to our God needs to get their head on straight. Not only should we not support their right to exist, but newsflash: God Almighty also doesn't, either. He does not embrace a nation that rejects His Son. Reject Christ, reject God (Luke 10:16). Reject God, be rejected by God (2 Chronicles 5:2). Does Israel have a right to exist? The short answer is no. The long answer is noooooooo. It doesn't. That does not mean - for the record - that Jews don't have a right to exist, any more or less than any other human has such a right. But their nation-state? Their body-politic? Their collective civic identity? No, it doesn't. And that's the only answer this side of common sense.
Tucker Carlson is asked the simple question, “Does Israel have a right to exist?” The correct answer is, “Yes.” Instead, Tucker twists himself into a ridiculous political pretzel as his antisemitism won’t allow him to not attack the Jewish people.
84
398
1,648
111,525
Day #9 of asking to the Dispos and "Christian Zionists" Where does the Holocaust fit into your warped and corrupted theology?
Day #8 of asking to the Dispos and "Christian Zionists" Where does the Holocaust fit into your warped and corrupted theology?
13
Youre alive?
Joe Kent testified before the Senate one year ago that Iran and its terror proxies threatened U.S. servicemembers in the Middle East. He said it would be an honor to return to the fight against terrorism, and he pledged to lead with integrity and accountability. The virulent anti-Semitism of his resignation letter makes it clear that Mr. Kent is incapable of upholding these pledges, and those who mistake its baseless and incendiary conspiracies for brave truth-telling are only fooling themselves. Isolationists and anti-Semites have no place in either party, and certainly do not deserve places of trust in our government.
1
26
Why are Israelis so triggered? they dont even live here.
This sad, broken, stupid person was director of the national counterterrorism center? Really? His whole letter is just an argument that it's all one giant Israeli conspiracy. And it isn't even a good version of that argument. It's just a crazy reddit post on federal stationery. He got completely lost down that rabbit hole. Lost enough to taint his own wife's death with this garbage. No, Israeli officials didn't dupe Trump into an anti-Iran posture that Trump has championed consistently since long before ever running for office. And no, Israel didn't dupe America into the Iraq War in 2003. Israel actually told America in real time not to go to Iraq because it was taking its eye off the real threat in Iran. That was Prime Minister Sharon's argument. (Yes, Netanyahu once gave testimony in Congress in favor of the Iraq war. He was a private citizen at the time. If that was enough to drag America to war, you've got bigger problems than Israel.) But it gets so, so much worse. This poor sod literally claims he lost his wife to "a war manufactured by Israel." But he lost his wife in Syria fighting ISIS -- a fight he actually supports in this very letter. So which is it? It's tragic reading this kind of insane babble from a broken man. More to the point, this isn't a man capable of understanding or articulating policy. He certainly wasn't in the room when any of these decisions were made. If he was, he wouldn't be telling old lies about old wars. It's good that he's quitting. When all you can see is the demonic specter of the "Jew" blocking out everything else in sight, you no longer have much to offer your country. No, America isn't this stupid. No, Israel isn't this nefarious or powerful. And no, your wife didn't die for Israel, but for America. What a sad, broken, stupid, incompetent man you had running your counterterrorism, America. And what a sad, pathetic party the Republican Party will become if this is its future.
2
53
You are going to move to Israel when the GOP gets absolutely destroyed in 2028. MARK MY WORDS
I don’t give a damn about what any of you people think of me. I live my life unapologetically because the truth is on my side and I have always been an honest person. I don’t ask anyone for anything and I provide for myself in an honest way. I am not going to compromise my values to get clicks, likes, money or fake ass friends in this toxic world of GOP politics run by a bunch of circus freaks. I hate all of you Jew obsessed lunatics. Especially Tucker Carlson. I hate him, I hate what he represents, and I dislike everyone who makes excuses for him. I find people who run cover for Tucker to be morally bankrupt and extremely anti- American. You’re all disgusting and evil. I don’t care if people like me or not. I have always been a lone wolf. I don’t need anyone.
1
66
I'm sure she took her cross off to write that.
There are many false claims in this letter but let me address one specifically: that "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation."   This is the same false claim that Democrats and some in the liberal media have been repeating over and over.   As President Trump has clearly and explicitly stated, he had strong and compelling evidence that Iran was going to attack the United States first.   This evidence was compiled from many sources and factors. President Trump would never make the decision to deploy military assets against a foreign adversary in a vacuum.   Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. The Iranian regime is evil. It proudly killed Americans, waged war against our country, and openly threatened us all the way up to the launch of Operation Epic Fury.   Iran was aggressively expanding their short-range ballistic missiles to combine with their naval assets to give themselves immunity – meaning they would have a degree of a capabilities that would give them immunity to hold us and the rest of the world hostage.   The regime aimed to use those ballistic missiles as a shield to continue achieving their ultimate goal – nuclear weapons.   The President, through his top negotiators, gave the regime every single possible opportunity to abandon this unacceptable course by permanently giving up their nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief, free nuclear fuel, and potential economic partnerships with our country.   But they would not say yes to peace because obtaining nuclear weapons was their fundamental goal.   President Trump ultimately made the determination that a joint attack with Israel would greatly reduce the risk to American lives that would come from a first strike by the terrorist Iranian regime and address this imminent threat to America’s national security interests.   All of this led to President Trump arriving at the determination that this military operation was necessary for U.S. national security, which is why he launched the massively successful Operation Epic Fury. The Commander-in-Chief determines what does and does not constitute a threat, because he is the one constitutionally empowered to do so - and because the American people went to the ballot box and entrusted him and him alone to make such final judgments. And finally, the absurd allegation that President Trump made this decision based on the influence of others, even foreign countries, is both insulting and laughable. President Trump has been remarkably consistent and has said for DECADES that Iran can NEVER possess a nuclear weapon. As someone who actually witnesses President Trump’s decision-making process on a daily basis, I can attest to the fact that he is always looking to do what’s in the best interest of the United States of America — period. America First.
3
36
Covenant Truth retweeted
Day #8 of asking to the Dispos and "Christian Zionists" Where does the Holocaust fit into your warped and corrupted theology?
Day #7 of asking to the Dispos and "Christian Zionists" Where does the Holocaust fit into your warped and corrupted theology?
1
2
77
If you accept Judaism, You deny Jesus Christ. Not up for debate.
🚨 Mark Levin Drops a Bombshell: Rejecting Judaism Means You're Not a True Christian—and You're Rejecting America Itself!🚨 As a dedicated biblical student with multiple theology degrees and countless full reads of Scripture cover to cover, I stand firmly with Levin on this core truth: **Judaism and Christianity are inseparably linked.** You can't sever the two without tearing apart the foundation of our faith and our nation. Paul himself was a devout Jew and brilliant scholar (Philippians 3:5-6). The Old Testament prophecies—many still awaiting fulfillment, like those in Daniel—form the bedrock of Christian hope. For centuries, the early Church relied solely on the Hebrew Scriptures (what we call the Old Testament) until the New Testament writings were compiled and canonized. Rejecting this unbreakable connection echoes the hypocrisy of history's worst bigots. Slave owners sat in church pews every Sunday, praising Jesus while committing atrocities against Black people. They claimed faith but lived in denial of its full truth—just as some today try to disconnect Christianity from its Jewish roots. Levin is spot-on: Dismissing Judaism dismisses the Bible's unity, the Judeo-Christian principles that shaped America's founding, and ultimately, what makes us exceptional as a nation. Christianity doesn't replace Judaism—it fulfills and builds upon it. The roots run deep. Ignore them, and you risk losing the tree. **Christ is King, and the Scriptures—Old and New—are one unbreakable Word.** 🇺🇸✝️ Who's with me? Drop a 🔥 if you agree Judaism and Christianity are eternally connected! #JudeoChristian #BibleTruth #AmericaFirst
1
3
5
155
Day #7 of asking to the Dispos and "Christian Zionists" Where does the Holocaust fit into your warped and corrupted theology?
Day #6 of asking to the Dispos and "Christian Zionists" Where does the Holocaust fit into your warped and corrupted theology?
2
92
Am I shadow banned?
3
1
35
Covenant Truth retweeted
Did Mark Levin write that himself? 🤣🤣🤣
Mar 16
President Trump defended and praised Mark Levin on Truth Social, saying that anyone who speaks ill of him is “NOT MAGA.” Follow: @AFpost
1
3
86
Just because 🇮🇱is our ally it does not mean they are on our side.
2
29
Covenant Truth retweeted
Look on the bright side America, at least you know never ever again to vote in anyone who is a shill for 🇮🇱.
1
3
46
Covenant Truth retweeted
You say some promises are unique to Israel within the church. But Ephesians 3:6 says Gentiles are fellow heirs of the same promise in Jesus Christ. Not similar promises. The same promise. So which specific promises are unique to ethnic Israel within the body of Jesus Christ that Gentile believers do not equally inherit. And where does Paul teach a two tier inheritance within the one body. Because Ephesians 2 abolished the dividing wall. Ephesians 3 made Gentiles fellow heirs of the same promise. Galatians 3:29 says if you belong to Jesus Christ you are Abraham's offspring and heirs according to the promise. No ethnic qualifier. No two tier system. One inheritance. One body. One promise. In Jesus Christ alone.
1
1
29
Covenant Truth retweeted
Paul is quoting Isaiah 59:20. The Redeemer will come to Zion. Paul applies it to Jesus Christ. Past tense fulfillment. The Redeemer came. From Zion. Jesus Christ born in Israel. Died in Jerusalem. Rose from the dead. Ascended. That is the coming from Zion. Already accomplished. You just said the Israel that inherits the promises is also the church. Then you said all Israel cannot be the church. You cannot hold both positions simultaneously. Either the church inherits the promises as the true Israel of God or it does not. And your argument that our sins are not forgiven yet is simply not what the New Testament teaches. Colossians 1:14. In Jesus Christ we have the forgiveness of sins. Right now. Already. Every believer. Jew and Gentile equally under the same New Covenant. The Redeemer came from Zion. Jesus Christ. Already. The ungodliness is removed from Jacob through the New Covenant that takes away sins. Already established at the cross. Already applied to every believer. You are defending a unique promise for Israel that Paul already applied to Jesus Christ and already declared accomplished. The Redeemer came. The covenant is established. The sins are forgiven. Through Jesus Christ alone. For everyone in him equally. That is not trouble. That is the gospel.
1
1
2
49
Covenant Truth retweeted
Replying to @BibleInContext1
🇮🇱 is from satan.
1
2
25
Covenant Truth retweeted
You wouldn't know the truth if it hit you with the Holy Bible.
1
1
17