The arrogance of the puppets in TPUSA is astounding. So, welcome to my series where I expose every single one of their shady entities. Let’s start with my favorite one, the entity that may hold the financial map to a timeline into the cracks of the org before CK’s assassination, Turning Point Endowment. A little background for you: An endowment fund exists to help an organization when it has a bad year to ensure grants can still go out and the mission can be executed, but in 2023 TPUSA lost 41% of its assets. Interestingly enough, the endowment only sent $500k and instead locked $9M into private equity that nobody will name. This is what caused me to investigate the endowment and…well, get ready. Highlights below: (this one took a few weeks but it’s worth it. Deep dive with sources is free on my Substack now. Link in bio) → The vault secretly owns TPUSA’s own headquarters building and is the landlord to its political arm at roughly $51K/yr on $8M of property. Charity money subsidizing partisan politics is the one thing the tax code flatly forbids. They made this one a little difficult to figure out, but unfortunately for them, I’m very good at what I do. → The board expanded from 3 to 5 people just six months before Kirk’s death, (March 2025) with names the IRS has still never seen, in a transaction that wouldn’t surface in any public filing until 2027 if I hadn’t figured it out through other filings. → TPUSA claimed moving donor money into its own savings account as a “charitable accomplishment,” on their reports. This is the same category as the campus tours. But, that one entry actually just hid $11M of surplus from people who donate to these corrupt grifters. → It’s not an endowment. It’s 100% board-designated, and 0% legally restricted. Three people can spend all $70M tomorrow on anything they can call the mission. “Endowment” is the marketing word for tax purposes, but in reality it’s a war chest with no oversight. → The endowment ran real estate and private equity for years, then quietly rewrote the charter to allow it two years after the fact. This is another huge red flag and the charter was the cleanup. The full investigation is up on my Substack (link in bio) with sources, charts, etc. If you’re reading this, Kolvet, Neff, Bowyer, Kirk, buckle up because this is just your appetizer.

🎯 Deep Dive: The Quiet Coup Inside the NDAA The Responsible Statecraft piece has put its finger on something genuinely significant — and the fact that this is happening inside a must-pass $1.15 trillion defense bill, buried at Section 224, tells you everything about how the permanent national security apparatus operates when it wants to avoid a public fight. 🏗️ What Section 224 Actually Does This isn’t a tweak. Section 224 — titled the “United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative” — is a structural rewiring of the U.S.-Israel military relationship. The provision authorizes $150 million annually from FY2027 through FY2029, but the money is almost beside the point. What matters is the architecture it builds: - Bilateral R&D across AI, quantum computing, autonomous systems, directed energy, cyber, biotech, counter-drone systems, and missile defense - Co-production and joint ventures with Israeli defense firms on U.S. soil - Licensing agreements that embed Israeli-origin intellectual property into Pentagon programs of record - “Network integration” and “data fusion” — which means U.S. military data flowing into Israeli systems and vice versa - Pathways from R&D straight into procurement, bypassing the normal foreign aid oversight channels The key phrase in the legislative text: technologies are to be identified for “integration into United States systems and programs of record.” That’s not foreign aid. That’s making Israeli defense tech a backbone of the U.S. military. 🔄 The Strategic Shift: From Aid to Embedded Infrastructure The Quincy Institute’s Steven Simon has been tracking this for months. His brief, The Disappearing Aid Check, lays out exactly what’s happening — and it’s more sophisticated than most people realize. The current model: Israel receives Foreign Military Financing (FMF) through the State Department, voted on annually by Congress. It's visible. It's politically accountable. People can argue about it. The new model: Phase out FMF grants and replace them with Pentagon procurement accounts, industrial partnerships, and sustainment pipelines. Same money, different door — one with vastly less transparency. The logic, as Simon documents, is being sold under an “America First” framing: this isn’t a handout to Israel, it’s an investment in American military readiness, industrial capacity, and jobs. Israeli co-production facilities in Mississippi and Arkansas become political leverage — members of Congress protect the jobs in their districts, and the relationship becomes structurally impossible to unwind. This is the same playbook the military-industrial complex always uses: distribute the subcontracts across as many congressional districts as possible so no one dares vote against the program. Now they’re doing it with a foreign country’s defense sector. 🕳️ The Transparency Problem The shift from State Department-administered FMF to Pentagon procurement is the move that should alarm anyone who cares about accountability. Under the FMF model: - Congress votes on the aid package publicly - The State Department provides human rights certifications - There’s diplomatic oversight and policy conditionality - Public debate is possible Under the Pentagon procurement model: - Funding moves through budget justification documents and program element descriptions - Oversight is limited to “cost, readiness, and capability” — bureaucratic criteria - The relationship gets evaluated like any other weapons program, not as a strategic political commitment - No diplomatic strings attached As the Responsible Statecraft piece notes, this would give Israel “a higher level of military-industrial integration than the U.S. has with any other country in the world” — including NATO allies. Not even the Five Eyes partners have this kind of embedded access to U.S. defense procurement. 🧬 The Legislative Genealogy This didn’t come out of nowhere. H.R. 7540 (Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-TX) and S. 3855 (Sen. Ted Budd, R-NC) were introduced as standalone bills in February 2026 with nearly identical language. When a standalone passage looked difficult, the provisions got folded into the NDAA — the classic maneuver for legislation that can’t survive public scrutiny on its own. The JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security of America) influence is unmistakable. Their “Partners in Production” report explicitly recommended deeper industrial integration and the addition of Israel to the U.S. National Technology and Industrial Base (NTIB). The FY2026 NDAA had already directed DoD to establish a working group to assess exactly that. Section 224 is the next logical step — and JINSA’s fingerprints are all over it. ⚠️ Why This Matters More Than the Dollar Figure $150 million a year is a rounding error in a $1.15 trillion defense bill. But the institutional architecture this creates is permanent. Once Israeli firms are embedded in U.S. supply chains, once Israeli-origin IP is inside Pentagon programs of record, once U.S. and Israeli military data networks are fused — disentanglement becomes economically and institutionally impossible. You can’t just stop the aid check. You’d have to rip apart procurement programs, break contracts, and rebuild supply chains. That’s the point. This is designed to make the relationship irreversible — at precisely the moment when a growing number of Americans are questioning unconditional support for Israel’s actions in the region. The traditional Israel lobby works through campaign contributions and media influence. This is more sophisticated: it works through the defense procurement bureaucracy itself, creating material interests that guarantee political support regardless of public opinion. 🗳️ What Happens Next The House Armed Services Committee markup is scheduled for June 4, 2026. After that, the bill moves to the full House, then reconciliation with the Senate version. Section 224 is currently in the base text — meaning it was put there by committee leadership before amendments or broader debate. That’s how the most consequential provisions get through: bury them in the chairman’s mark, count on the must-pass nature of the NDAA, and dare anyone to hold up the entire defense budget over one section. Members who want to stop this have a narrow window: force a floor amendment to strike Section 224, or demand recorded votes that put colleagues on the record supporting the fusion of U.S. and Israeli militaries. The question is whether anyone has the stomach for that fight when the pro-Israel apparatus in both parties remains largely unchallenged. The Responsible Statecraft piece is right to flag this. The quiet ones are always the ones that matter most.

Leah, this is incredible work. Would you be ok with me using this work on whokilledthescientists.com? I would obviously credit you for the work you've done. I want this site to be the best and most comprehensive place to go for any and all information on this case and I believe I've accomplished that. Your work would be a great addition.

We don’t talk enough about the fact that Erika Kirk stopped posting bible verses on X on 9/19/2023. And it’s “Also, I will teach you to respect me completely, and I will put a new way of thinking inside you. I will take out the stubborn hearts of stone from your bodies, and I will give you obedient hearts of flesh” WTFF And then she doesn’t post another one until 2 days before Charlie was killed “for by grace you have been saved by faith; and this is not your own doing, it is the gift of his, not the result of works, so that no one may boast” Then another on 9/9. And another on the morning before he was assassinated “god is our refuge in strength, a very present help in trouble”. Yeah, it really looks like she knew.

This new IRS blood money deal that Trump and the corrupt DOJ did yesterday is insane. People keep saying it's $1.8B but they are missing the point, it's $1.776B for a reason. See what they did there? 1776 That's what it will be used for. The "Anti-weaponization fund" with OUR tax dollars will be used in fact as a weapon. On top of it all, Trump and his sons and his sons' corrupt businesses will be sheltered from IRS audits. As someone who has just skimmed the surface of them, this is insane.

Please vote for Thomas Massie #Kentucky , you can make you country better. America can dream still

The DOJ are criminals