🚨🚨🚨 Why
@RealCandaceO is full of it, and why
@tpusa and
@MrsErikaKirk ARE doing the right thing buy not engaging with Psycho Candace and her PSYCHO cult:
TPUSA under Erika Kirk is playing this exactly right by not endlessly engaging the conspiracy nonsense surrounding Charlie Kirk's assassination. They're focused on the mission, the family, and letting the evidence come out in court. This is the smart move, the grifters will not explain it, so I will:
The case against Tyler Robinson is active. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for July 6-10, 2026 prosecutors plan to lay out forensics (DNA on the rifle, towel, screwdriver), video of the shooter, texts, notes, witness statements from family/roommate/Discord group, and more. Defense is fighting to seal parts of it to protect the jury pool. This is a death penalty case. Jumping into every X thread or podcast battle right now would be reckless, people just do not understand.
High profile cases such as this, often come with either formal or informal guidance from prosecutors: "Please do not discuss the case or any aspect of the case" They have most likely been advised to let the evidence speak for itself. Commenting risks contempt, tainting evidence, or giving the defense ammo to claim, "media prejudice" or "witness intimidation." Erika and the team have almost certainly been advised by the U.S. Attorney's office, FBI, or their own lawyers to keep statements measured, brief and to avoid whenever possible.
We've seen this in countless big cases victims' families get the "say nothing" talk to protect conviction chances. Engaging every wild theory would hand defense lawyers free material. Why would you people want this for Charlie when you claim to LOVE HIM?
Look at the queen of the grift
@RealCandaceO for example. Candace has gone all-in on theories: possible Israel/Mossad involvement, TPUSA insiders "betraying" Charlie, suppressed evidence, tunnels, multiple shooters, questions about Erika herself, etc.
She's done multi-episode podcasts, leaked internal audio, and kept the cycle going for months. Result? Internal TPUSA firings, staff leaks to her show, public rifts, and a ton of conservative infighting. Erika met with her privately for hours in Dec 2025, brought records and lawyers to address concerns, called it "productive," and still focused on AmericaFest and TPUSA's future. Publicly, Erika's message was simple and powerful: "Stop." Stop spreading lies that hurt the family and the org. But Candace continues, not for Charlie, for herself. For her eternal grift.
Engaging more would just feed the algorithm and give oxygen to claims that thrive on attention, not evidence. Every rebuttal becomes "See? They're hiding something!" It's a trap, it's AI, it's edited, on and on. People want Charlie's death to be more than it is, a troubled kid who did not understand the Charlie Kirk message, who took it upon himself to end the life of a great man. People need it to be a vast conspiracy, It is built into the human psyche.
Do all of you have to be reminded of the OJ SImpson and Casey Anthony cases? The pre-trial publicity in SImpson cases-- Jurors later cited external pressure and perceptions of a "media circus." Some family/victim statements and leaks fueled defense claims of bias. This allowed a murderer to go free.
Casey Anthony, her family's public interviews and relentless media created a poisoned atmosphere. Jurors reported feeling overwhelmed; some family testimony was seen as evasive or damaging to credibility on the stand. Defense used the frenzy to argue reasonable doubt. Do you want this for Charlie?
Emotional public comments pre-trial have led to defense motions claiming jury prejudice, requests for venue changes, or even mistrial arguments if they reach jurors.
In various murder cases, overly detailed or accusatory family interviews have been cited as "inflammatory," giving defense attorneys grounds to challenge evidence admission or argue taint. Courts sometimes sequester families or issue informal warnings to protect the prosecution's case.
Candace Owens, Baron Coleman are two people who know this. Their grift is about themselves, Baron Coleman suggested Charlie even got himself killed. Candace has accused anybody and everybody around Charlie Kirk, she hasn't GRIEVED over Charlie, she has padded her bank account, lifted her public profile and is now becoming powerful. All of the body of her dead "friend" She is not a truth seeking journalist, she is a queen of the grift, one more thing Candace, you now claim you cannot release that video because you are "consulting" lawyer. You claim to have had it for 7 months, long time to get an opinion that is very clear, if you have the truth, you could easily release a one minute snippet under the fair use defense in copyright law, but you have not told your psychotic audience any of that, have you? Also, interesting how you went after Laura Loomer hard, after she proved you lied about "NEVER" owning the vehicle connected to George DWI.
Yet, you people still listen to her.
x.com/i/status/2053536692976…