If Starmer wants to war with Russia, how about we send all the immigrants and left wing lunatics that push this Russia is the enemy narrative? We can’t, because they’re not British. Plus the left have mental illnesses that prevent them joining the Armed Forces. Consistent at Protests for Gays and Palestine though

Reform voters need to understand that Reform is more of the same we had with the Tory’s who continued the madness. It’s time to get aboard Restore which is the only Anti Establishment movement. Rupert Lowe will give us our country back. Farage is in it for himself. Always has been.

He’s breaking the Human Rights Laws he’s involved in making

Russia isn’t Britains enemy. This UK Government is. BBC cover ups and Traitors in Power. Socialist turning Communist UK

It just gets fucking worse with these 3rd world rapists. These are our daughters!!

Imagine this was Rupert Lowe or Nigel Farage? It would be headline news. We are in a spiritual war between good and evil. Tyranny and Communism against the good people.

There’s a trial ongoing with 3 rent boys charged with Arson with intent to endanger life by setting fire to 2 homes and a car of Keir Starmer. The Investigation was done by Counter Terrorism. Why would Ukrainian Rent boys target him 3 times? This was against UK Prime Minister. This is going on RIGHT NOW but NOTHING by the media. What are we missing here? Something shady about this guy and he could have serious skeletons in his closet. He’s going all out to destroy our country while he can. Communism in the UK 2026

This crazy tyranny needs to be stopped!

Andy Burnham as PM will be Keir Starmer on steroids. They are going to do as much damage as they can while in power. We are going full blown Communism right in front of our own eyes. Good people of Makerfield need to wake up. We can’t have Labour win that seat and Burnham going to Downing Street. Restore Britain is the only way out for 2029.

Banning teenagers from social media with ludicrous conditions is unworkable, unrealistic and unwanted. Here’s a mad idea - let parents parent. Not the state, but mums, dads, grandparents or whoever else. Restore Britain will always trust the family over big government.

This is 100% what we have needed 💪 🇬🇧

Makerfield taxi driver, 63, faces life on benefits due to Labour's Andy Burnham’s Clean Air Zone madness! John from Wigan has a 17-year-old taxi that’s immaculate and passes every emissions and MOT test. But from 31 Dec 2026, Burnham’s policy bans any car over 12 years old, regardless of emissions. John can’t afford a new £20k taxi and at 63 he’ll be forced out of work and onto benefits! ‼️This is the real cost of net zero virtue-signalling on working people. Vote @RestoreBritain to end this assault on hardworking British people!🇬🇧

Half of the British electorate did not vote last time. That's because they had nothing and no one to vote for. They do now. @RestoreBritain

The last two Rangers managers who properly took it to them bastards were Walter and McLeish. Tough, firm Protestants who bled red, white and blue and understood exactly what Rangers is all about. Derek McInnes fits that mould.

This message becomes more relevant every single day here in Britain.

Denmark publishes crime by country of origin, not nationality. I looked at 2021-2025 data. Overall: Somali-origin 7.8x the Danish rate. American-origin 0.34x. Thread of Top Five and Bottom Five.

Wow. This makes 100% sense.

Two tier justice in the UK

Agenda 2030 Or The Defence Of The Realm. Starmer Has Made His Choice. John Healey Has Resigned Over It. This morning Britain woke up without a Defence Secretary. By lunchtime it knew why. The numbers tell the story precisely. The Ministry of Defence faces a £28 billion funding shortfall over four years. Healey wanted £18 billion. He was offered £13.5 billion of which defence chiefs regarded only £10 billion as real money. The remaining £3.5 billion was, in the words of the Telegraph, invented through magical accounting tricks. The Chief of the Defence Staff, Sir Richard Knighton, took the unusual step of writing directly to Starmer to warn that the money was not enough. The head of the British armed forces writing directly to the Prime Minister is not a routine communication. It is a signal of desperation. Starmer told NATO last week that it is our intelligence assessment that there could be an attack by Russia on NATO as soon as 2030. Those are his words. His government's assessment. Shared with our allies. Four years away. And his Treasury offered the man responsible for defending against that threat an accounting trick and a two page summary instead of a funded plan. Why. Because the money was needed elsewhere. In 2015 every United Nations member state including Britain signed the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Its 17 goals and 169 targets commit signatory nations to facilitating migration, eliminating inequality, achieving net zero and embedding inclusive institutions. No British parliament voted on it. No British public was consulted. It was adopted at a UN summit and has been implemented ever since through regulatory frameworks, public sector guidance and institutional capture rather than democratic mandate. It is not a conspiracy. It is a publicly available document on the UN website. And its priorities, net zero, welfare, migration, DEI, are precisely the budgets this government has protected while offering the defence of the realm an accounting trick. Ed Miliband refused to cut his net zero budget to fund defence. The Labour Party refused to cut welfare spending that would have freed up billions. The £10 billion in asylum accommodation contracts continues. The DEI infrastructure embedded across British policing, the NHS, the civil service and the education system continues to be funded. Every one of these is a commitment that takes precedence over the defence of the realm in this government's spending decisions. The hierarchy of priorities is now visible. A government that has spent two years embedding progressive transformation across British institutions, protecting the net zero agenda from cuts and managing mass migration has discovered that it cannot simultaneously do all of that and defend the country. When the moment of decision arrived the progressive agenda was protected and the armed forces were handed a two page summary and told to make do. Lord Robertson, the former Labour Defence Secretary and NATO Secretary General, warned in April that Britain was underprepared, underinsured and under attack. He said there was a corrosive complacency in Britain's political leadership. The army has been reduced to its smallest size in 200 years. Seven warships have been axed. The Defence Investment Plan was due last autumn, delayed through winter, missed its spring deadline and has now produced the resignation of the Defence Secretary on the day it was finally meant to be published. Healey's letter says without a plan that meets the moment he is being forced to make decisions that would reduce the readiness of our forces, increase the risk to personnel on operations and could make the country less safe. He had no other option but to resign. In the most dangerous security environment since the Cold War a Labour government has chosen the globalist agenda over the defence of the realm. That choice has now cost it its Defence Secretary. The question is what it will cost the country.

Kaz, thank you. Agenda 2030 sounds like a conspiracy theory. It's not. It's a publicly available document adopted at a UN summit in September 2015 and signed by every member state including Britain, Australia and Canada. It contains 17 goals and 169 targets committing signatory nations to net zero, facilitating migration, eliminating inequality and embedding inclusive institutions across public life. No British parliament voted on it. No British public was consulted. It's been implemented ever since through regulatory frameworks, public sector guidance and institutional capture. The Race Action Plans. The DEI training. The asylum accommodation contracts. The net zero commitments that Ed Miliband refused to cut even when the Defence Secretary was asking for the money to defend the country. All of it flows from the same framework adopted without democratic consent at a UN summit eleven years ago. Healey's resignation is the moment that framework's cost became impossible to ignore. Britain cannot afford Agenda 2030 and its own defence simultaneously. Starmer has made his choice. The question is whether enough people now understand what that choice actually means.