What you’re describing is a real dynamic: one-sided emotional access, where someone shows up mainly for support but disappears when things are stable. Over time, that can feel less like friendship and more like emotional outsourcing.
That said, the cleanest way to frame it is less about judging their character and more about noticing the pattern and impact. If contact is consistently initiated only during their need, and there’s no mutual investment outside of that, then it’s reasonable to step back or reduce access.
As for cutting people off, most people don’t do it all at once. It usually starts with noticing the imbalance, then pulling back a bit, then seeing whether anything changes. If nothing changes over time, distance becomes the natural outcome, not a dramatic decision.
The key takeaway is simple: attention is not the same as connection, and urgency is not the same as care.
We need to talk about the people who only show up when they need something.
There's months of silence. They don't check in, not even a simple text like "thinking of you," nothing. Then suddenly they're in your inbox because they need advice, comfort, or a favor. And once they've gotten what they want, it's back to default...silence.
This isn't friendship or love; it's convenience. You're not valued, you're available. There's a difference between someone who's busy and someone who's intentional. Busy people still send a quick text. Intentional people make time even when life is chaotic.
If someone only remembers you exist when they're in crisis mode, that tells you everything about where you rank in their life.
Stop confusing access to you with appreciation for you. They're not the same thing.
Have you ever cut someone off for this? How long did it take you to notice the pattern?