Just opened iup a Giveth Project; giveth.io/project/defisafety Love those folks

DeFiSafety's Eth address 0x4A46993200Ac4305321AE194e050285f5738c1A6, DeFiSafety.eth is always open for donations. This is also for an EthSecurity badge!!

I just published Why DeFiSafety Scores Matter medium.com/p/why-defisafety-…

Got a protocol, need $$$ from an LP? A protocol review will make that easier, cause they know their money will be safe

One thing DeFiSafety offers is security opsec consulting. Let our 5 years of DeFi experience help you operate safely. Want to know how to set your business up for stablecoins transfers? What security steps make sense for personal DeFi transactions? What are the pros and cons of using an exchange? How much of my transactions are public? Can I protect that? Let us help you. Reach out today.

NEW REPORT PUBLISHED: @TermMaxFi a new fixed income protocol has excellent overall security. Solid on all areas! defisafety.com/app/pqrs/613 Key Findings: 93% Awesome solid score.🛠👥 Code and Team 100%, perfect. Code Documentation: 70% Little architecture docs and thin software docs.📄🔍 Testing: 89%. Excellent tests, good monitoring. 🚨🧪 Security: 94%. Ticking all the boxes. They take security seriously. 🔒✅ Admin Controls 97% Mostly immutable and excellent admin control security, including sold transaction signing processes. Dive Deeper: For an in-depth analysis, explore the full TermMax report on DeFiSafety.

We’re thrilled to announce our close collaboration with the @modelguardnet team! Modelguard is a project launching on @virtuals_io to bring insurance to the agentic economy. Over the past months, we’ve brought our technical risk expertise to help build the core agent‑assessment logic behind ModelGuard’s AI underwriting & insurance infrastructure, grounded in transparent, verifiable data. This collaboration represents our shared mission: raising standards in autonomous DeFi and ensuring that protocol‑native agent risk is monitored, auditable, and secure.

We’re thrilled to announce our close collaboration with the @modelguardnet team! Modelguard is a project launching on @virtuals_io to bring insurance to the agentic economy. Over the past months, we’ve brought our technical risk expertise to help build the core agent‑assessment logic behind ModelGuard’s AI underwriting & insurance infrastructure, grounded in transparent, verifiable data. This collaboration represents our shared mission: raising standards in autonomous DeFi and ensuring that protocol‑native agent risk is monitored, auditable, and secure.

Euler Finance V2 is still solid in almost every way. Their docs are are a bit thin but otherwise good. Key Findings: 83% Excellent solid score.🛠👥 Code and Team 100%, perfect. Code Documentation: 46% Little architecture docs and thin software docs.📄🔍 Testing: 0%. Excellent tests, but no coverage or detailed report visible. 🚨🧪 Security: 97%. Ticking all the boxes. They take security seriously. 🔒✅ Admin Controls 73% Better multisig process needed but otherwise OK. Dive Deeper: For an in-depth analysis, explore the full Euler report on DeFiSafety.

Long delayed, please find the next installment in our Guide to DeFi - Tools for Transactions medium.com/defi-safety/pt-4-…

If you do big $$ Transaction on chain USE A SEPARATE SIGNING COMPUTER. This is relevant to ByBIT and Radiant Capital and others.

HyperLiquid has no transparency and doesn't care. They are proudly closed source and expect users to trust their anon founders. And with 1.7 billion TVL, it seems users don't care about transparency either. Their DeFiSafety score is 7%. defisafety.com/app/pqrs/610 Transparency is the best reason why DeFi is better than TradFi. But transparency is steadily disappearing. DeFi protocols have no financial incentive for transparency because no one (except for DeFiSafety which is tiny and underfunded) seems to care. LPs don't seem to care. Most users don't seem to care and there are no regulators. We are steadily killing DeFi with our own disdain.

Usual Finance has distinct weak points. No tests and almost no Access Control docs drives the score down to 49%. Code documentation and security is good, though. Key Findings: 50% No tests visible. Limited admin controls and docs 🛠👥 Code Documentation: 92% No complaints here, solid.📄🔍 Testing: 0%. No tests visible. No GitHub. 🚨🧪 Security: 83%. Good audits, but no bug bounty. They have active protocol monitoring though. 🔒✅ Admin Controls 13%. They clearly said they were upgradeable, but nothing else. Dive Deeper: For an in-depth analysis, explore the full Usual report on DeFiSafety. defisafety.com/app/pqrs/609

Solana’s Raydium Finance’s transparency has stayed substandard! Score 50%. Code documentation is limited and no tests are visible. Good audit and bug bounty though. This is the second review of Radium. The one from 2022 was about the same score. Key Findings: 50% No tests visible. Limited admin controls and docs 🛠👥 Code Documentation: 38% Whitepaper and some architecture docs, but no real software documentation.📄🔍 Testing: 0%. No tests visible. 🚨🧪 Security: 82%. They have a four audits (though the findings are concenring). Solid bug bounty. 🔒✅ Admin Controls 0%. They clearly say that devs have total control with no multisig. Dive Deeper: For an in-depth analysis, explore the full Raydium report on DeFiSafety. defisafety.com/app/pqrs/608

I just published another part of our DeFi Guide Pt 2 — Chains link.medium.com/an36EGVqMPb Next I dive into the wallet and transactions.

We just published our next article on the DeFi guide - Exchanges. The next one will be on chains. medium.com/defi-safety/pt-3-…

The second chapter to our Guide to DeFi answers the Why: medium.com/defi-safety/as-we…

We published the Intro to our Guide to DeFi; medium.com/defi-safety/guide…

Sticking with staking apps, let’s look at Jito, Solana’s staking choice Jito’s Score: 50%. a fail, though not a bad one. 📊 No documentation, weak testing, no admin controls but good audits Key Findings: 83% Code and team is strong. The devs did not respond at all. 🛠👥 Code Documentation: 0% We could not find documentation. The GitHub itself was confusing.📄🔍 Testing: 49%. They did do tests, but only 80% test to code and no test report.. 🚨🧪 Security: 86%. Solid audits, good bug bounty but no documented monitoring. 🔒✅ Admin Controls 0%. No discussion on admin controls despite a government section. Dive Deeper: For an in-depth analysis, explore the full Jito report on DeFiSafety. defisafety.com/app/pqrs/605

We are going back to weekly reports and will start off with this powerhouse of restaking. Eigan’ Score: 78%. Pretty good, a pass 📊 Key Findings: 90% Code and team is strong. The devs did not respond promptly. This is the only weak spot. 🛠👥 Code Documentation: 87% They could improve on traceability and architecture but overall thorough documentation.📄🔍 Testing: 73%. Good tests, yes with formal validation, but no documented code coverage or test report. 🚨🧪 Security: 86%. Solid audits, big bug bounty but I am not sure which audits are applicable to this code or if they have active monitoring. 🔒✅ Admin Controls 61%. The only individual score that did not pass. Rather dated, weak process. Room for improvement. Dive Deeper: For an in-depth analysis, explore the full Eigan Layer report on DeFiSafety. defisafety.com/app/pqrs/604