Exploring the digital frontier | Web3, AI, Blockchain & Innovation 🚀 | Stay ahead with Digi World 🌍

Joined July 2022
182 Photos and videos
The Dumbest CEO Ever - A Network SCAM! @Digitalgold1979 recently posted a video trying to defend A Network after being questioned over its dangerously low liquidity and a single wallet holding more than 50% of the pool. Instead of addressing the core issues, he chose to twist the facts. Let’s be clear, I’m not claiming that A Network was started with bad intentions during the free mining phase. However, the current direction they have taken is misleading and puts the community at serious risk. ➡️When the process itself is flawed, intentions no longer matter. And I am raising this concern because people who have joined and have invested or are planning to invest are from the Interlink community. A Network’s wANET liquidity pool currently has only around 300 tokens, with one wallet holding more than 50% of it. The total liquidity stands at just $16,000 – $17,000. In such a shallow pool, price movement is not driven by the so-called “900 holders” he keeps mentioning. It is controlled by the limited tokens available in the pool. If that single large holder, or even a group of holders decides to sell, there is almost no real liquidity to absorb the selling pressure. The price can collapse within minutes. Check the link below: dexscreener.com/bsc/0xb90071… Even more concerning is their Diamond Reward Program. While they publicly claim they are “not asking anyone to invest,” the program requires users to hold a minimum of 10 wANET (roughly $300), with higher tiers demanding even more. Most regular miners don’t hold this amount, which means they are indirectly forced to buy tokens to participate, turning it into a soft investment push. This is not organic growth. This is a liquidity trap being executed through clever marketing, first by pulling miners out of InterLink using fear, and now by indirectly extracting money from the same community through reward programs, all while the project has almost no real liquidity or strong financial backing. Warning: 99% community members will lose their hard earn money including the project CEO @Digitalgold1979 #InterLink #ITLG #ITL @inter_link @kv_interlink @reina_itl @itlx_defi @itl_fdn @scott_itlg
31
4
30
2,319
How A-Network Fooled Interlink Miners 😳 A-Network promotes scarcity, yet selected participants reportedly received wANET at around $0.15 earlier, while over 150,000 miners are expected to complete 1,000 sessions to receive only about 2.5–3 ANET after several months. Their wrapped token wANET has extremely low liquidity, and even that low liquidity is not that concerning. The main concern is with one wallet controlling more than 50% of the supply (166 wAnet out of 300): 0xeF7754B2dEA1D825a7AD79389Ca53f174858a58B This concentrated holding is being used to artificially maintain the price around $29–$30. Why? Because they recently launched their Diamond Reward Program to raise money directly from the community. Here’s how the program works: Diamond Reward Program Investment: • Basic → 10 wANET (~$290–300) | 3–6 months lock | Up to 6% extra • Mid → Higher wANET ITL (~$600–800) | 3–6 months lock | Up to 8% extra • Diamond → 50 ITL wANET (~$1,400 ) | 6 months lock | Up to 10% extra Most InterLink miners who joined A Network don’t understand liquidity mechanics. They see the price holding steady and think it’s due to real demand. In reality, this price is being supported so that more people invest in the reward program at these levels. At the same time, regular miners are being told that after completing 1000 sessions, they will receive only 2.5 to 3 ANET, after months of hard work. Meanwhile, selected people were given wANET at just 15 cents earlier. After the unlock: Most free miners will likely sell whatever they receive. Even small investors putting in $300–$500 will try to exit for profit. With already low liquidity and heavy concentration in a few wallets, this can create massive selling pressure. @Digitalgold1979 and @Joel_Dupalco convinced thousands to leave InterLink by talking about community and principles. Right now, they are using low liquidity and price control to extract fresh money from the same community through reward programs, while the project has no major investors to sustain it long term. This is not organic growth. This is a liquidity trap. #InterLink #ITLG #ITL @inter_link @kv_interlink @reina_itl @itlx_defi @itl_fdn @scott_itlg
69
15
65
4,899
Digital Gold Must Show His Zero Account On 22nd May, @Digitalgold1979 publicly announced that he is stopping all mining on InterLink. He called the project centralized and indirectly motivated thousands of Interlink miners to leave and join A Network. He made it sound like a moral decision, that he was leaving everything behind for the community and decentralization. He claimed that he was making a big sacrifice, giving up his own mined coins and HCS. Because of his words, thousands of miners who supported and believed him also stopped their mining on InterLink. More than 20 days have passed since that announcement. But till today, he has shown zero proof that he actually stopped mining or set his account to zero. If you had the courage to attack another project and pull thousands of miners out, then show the same courage now. You made a public claim and asked people to trust you. Now show the proof. I have never said against A Network. But the constant negativity and daily attacks on InterLink by the A Network team have become disturbing. Because of their repeated negative posts, even my community keeps asking me questions, and I have to keep handling the situation. This is not about personal issues. This is about accountability. Digital Gold must show his zero account. #InterLink #ITLG #ITL @inter_link @kv_interlink @reina_itl @itlx_defi @itl_fdn @scott_itlg
78
9
44
5,356
Heights of Double Standards 😡 InterLink’s Core Ambassador @DhirajK26126238 posted a suggestion to buy 1 $ITL on OTC and execute multiple small transactions at 0.0001 $ITL to maximize $ATV rewards. A Network’s core member @BaskaranBBV quickly attacked it, calling it nonsense and accusing them of promoting speculation. However, the same team has a member @dayamaydas publicly claiming he turned ₹6,000 into nearly ₹7,50,000 in A Network. Below is the post: x.com/dayamaydas/status/2064… Now here’s the real question: While you attack others for “encouraging speculation,” your own member is openly posting massive profit claims that clearly create FOMO in the community. A Network’s liquidity is currently only around $10K–$15K, with barely 200 ANET in the pool. Can this person realistically sell even 50% of his holdings today without crashing the price? Or is most of this ₹7.5 lakh just paper profit? You can’t demand “anti-speculation” standards from others while allowing unrealistic gain posts from your own side. That’s not leadership, that’s double standards. If you have a problem with InterLink’s management or their approach, that’s your choice. But why attack every small thing just to look superior? If you want to criticize, at least do it with proper logic and reasoning, not random shots. #InterLink #ITLG #ITL @inter_link @kv_interlink @reina_itl @itlx_defi @itl_fdn @scott_itlg
People can attack me personally all they want, but facts don't change. I invested roughly ₹6,000 in A Network, and today I'm sitting on holdings worth around ₹750,000. If you know another project that delivered similar results, show me. I'll praise that project too.
31
4
26
4,022
Is LinkersMap @LinkersMap a SCAM? 😳 Lately, a lot of people in the community have been calling @LinkersMap a scam or saying it’s going to flop. I’ve seen multiple comments questioning the shop registrations, pricing, verification process, and how international shipping will even work. 🟠First let's face the reality: If we keep demanding that the company should do everything while we only criticize and wait to dump our tokens, then no real utility will ever be created. ➡️Use cases don’t appear magically, they are built. 🟠Let's take a step back and look at it objectively. First, LinkersMap is not even operational yet. We are still in the registration and ecosystem-building phase. ITL is not fully active, merchants are onboarding, and the marketplace itself is still being developed. This is not a company trying to “sell” something to the community. This is an attempt to build real utility for ITL inside our own ecosystem. When ITL launches, people will obviously want to sell it for cash. But if there’s a platform where they can directly spend that ITL on real products and services from registered shops, then at least a portion of the selling pressure can be converted into actual usage. This is how ecosystems are built. We have millions of active users in this community. If even 5–10% of us actively participate, whether by registering shops, becoming customers, or bringing in real businesses we know, this can grow into something meaningful. Amazon also started with just books from a garage. It didn’t become a giant overnight. It grew because people started using it. 🟠But $ITL isn't even live yet, why are they pricing things?" This is basic economics! You build the roads BEFORE the cars arrive. The core team is establishing a real-world USE CASE. When $ITL drops, having ready-to-use merchants prevents a massive sell-off. It’s called building a sustainable economy. 🟠And as for pricing discrepancies? That is a fair concern and something the market itself will ultimately determine. In any new marketplace, different sellers may price products differently until enough buyers, sellers, and competition create natural price discovery. The bigger question is not whether every listing is perfect today. The bigger question is whether the ecosystem can attract enough real businesses, products, services, and users to create sustainable economic activity over time. LinkersMap may succeed. LinkersMap may fail. But I believe it should be judged by real adoption, utility, and execution once it is live, not solely by assumptions made before the marketplace has even launched. Yes, the platform is still rough and incomplete. That’s normal in the beginning. The real question is whether the community wants to help build it or just criticize it from the sidelines. Calling it a scam at this stage, without even seeing how it functions once ITL is live, is unfair. Stop the negativity and start building! 🤝 #InterLink #ITLG #ITL @Dr_Picoin @kv_interlink @reina_itl @itlx_defi @itl_fdn @scott_itlg
24
7
43
3,314
InterLink Migration: Let's Talk Economics, Not Fear As June is the month of Private mainnet. Recently, a lot of YouTubers and influencers have been claiming: "Only a few selected people will get tokens." "Most users will get nothing." "Everyone else is being scammed." Before jumping to conclusions, let's understand how large blockchain ecosystems actually work. 🟠 Migration Is More Than Just Sending Tokens Many people think migration simply means pressing a button and distributing tokens to everyone instantly. In reality, large-scale blockchain migrations involve multiple layers: ➡️Identity verification ➡️Human verification ➡️Wallet validation ➡️Reward calculations ➡️Security checks ➡️Distribution mechanisms ➡️Tokenomics management Migration is not just a technical process. It is also a security, operational, and economic process. 🟠 Why Don't Large Projects Make Everyone Fully Liquid On Day One? This is one of the most misunderstood topics. Could a project technically distribute tokens to a large number of wallets? In many cases, yes. But the more important question is: Should every participant become fully liquid on Day One? Large blockchain projects typically consider several factors: 🔹 Verification & Security Projects need to ensure rewards are going to verified users and not duplicate, fraudulent, or compromised accounts. 🔹 Operational Complexity Millions of users may have different mining histories, referral structures, verification statuses, lockup choices, and reward calculations. Managing this responsibly often requires phased execution. 🔹 Tokenomics & Market Stability Imagine millions of users receiving fully liquid tokens on the same day. Many would immediately sell before understanding the ecosystem. This could create extreme sell pressure and unstable price discovery before utility develops. This is why projects use mechanisms like: Vesting Locking Staking Phased migration Controlled token releases 🔹 Ecosystem Readiness A blockchain is not just a token. It also includes wallets, exchanges, liquidity, businesses, applications, and users. Distribution strategies are designed around the readiness of the broader ecosystem. 🟠 Infrastructure Capacity Is Only One Piece Even with a high-performance blockchain, projects still need to balance: ➡️Security ➡️Verification ➡️Liquidity ➡️Tokenomics ➡️Ecosystem growth ➡️Market stability 🟠Tokens Are Not Cash This is the biggest misunderstanding. Many influencers are saying: "You'll only get few bucks" Migration is not a cash distribution event. Nobody is being handed fixed rupees. People are being allocated TOKENS. Token value is not fixed. It depends on: ➡️Adoption ➡️Utility ➡️Liquidity ➡️Demand ➡️Ecosystem growth The market determines value over time — not a YouTube thumbnail. 🟠Final Thought No migration process guarantees success. No token guarantees value. The real questions are: ➡️Can the ecosystem create real utility? ➡️Can businesses and users adopt it? ➡️Can sustainable demand be generated? Those questions matter far more than calculating hypothetical rupee values on Day One. If someone is only focused on “How many bucks will I get tomorrow?”, they may already be looking at free-mining projects the wrong way. These projects distribute tokens, not salaries. Fear sells on YouTube. Understanding economics doesn’t. #InterLink #ITLG #ITL @inter_link @kv_interlink @reina_itl @itlx_defi @itl_fdn @scott_itlg
5
4
30
2,952
InterLink Office - Exposed 😳 For months, people have been questioning and spreading negativity about InterLink’s office address. Especially YouTuber Sachin Bhatt, who was previously an ambassador and KOL for InterLink, has been targeting the project without solid reasons. ➡️Let me be very clear. In startups, especially crypto startups, having a big physical office is not as important as people think. Most projects use virtual or serviced offices, exactly like InterLink is doing. My purpose is not to say InterLink will make you a millionaire or guarantee its success. Success will always depend on execution, adoption, and market conditions. But blindly calling everything a scam or spreading negativity without checking facts is also not right. Recently, many are claiming that “InterLink is not registered in the USA.” This is completely false. Here are the official government records: 🟠California Secretary of State (SOS) Business Search: bizfileonline.sos.ca.gov/sea… 🟠California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) Status: ftb.ca.gov/ Just search “InterLink Labs” , you will see the company is Active and legally registered in California. ➡️The address 895 Dove Street, Suite 300, Newport Beach is a Regus virtual/serviced office. This is a very common and legitimate practice used by thousands of startups and crypto projects worldwide. It provides a prestigious address, mail handling, and legal compliance without the huge cost of a full physical office. People like Sachin Bhatt are saying InterLink created hype about its office. I have also gone through the posts. The hype was created for the event, not for the office. He needs to improve his English reading skills. Here is what the original post actually said: "A global event will be held at InterLink Labs Office Newport Beach, California and live on the official InterLink Youtube channel." Original post link: x.com/inter_link/status/2005… And yes, I also did not like the way the hype was created for the event and how it was executed. So I did criticise InterLink for the same. My opinion on the event: x.com/DigiworldWeb3/status/2… Just to prove InterLink a scam, you cannot use illogical reasons and influence the community in a negative direction. Let’s discuss with facts, not just emotions. What do you think? #InterLink #ITLG #ITL @inter_link @kv_interlink @reina_itl @itlx_defi @itl_fdn @scott_itlg
Replying to @kv_interlink
Dear KV, this is not really about the duration of the event. It’s more about the way Timmering addressed the community. From an honest, third-person point of view if you yourself think, even you would personally not enjoy the video that much. Most of the information shared has already been discussed and communicated over the past several days. At the very least, Timmering could have done a live session with some level of personalization. Even a simple “Hello to the community” would have made a difference. There was no sense of connection or rapport-building with the community. That lack of engagement is the main reason many of us felt disappointed—not because there was no AMA, but because there was no effort to connect with the people who are supporting the project. From a community-management perspective, expectations weren’t wrong—delivery was. When a leader addresses a large and invested community, people naturally expect human connection, not just a summary. Even if no AMA was planned, a short live appearance, acknowledgment of the community, or a warmer tone would have significantly changed the reaction. The disappointment isn’t about what was said, it’s about how it was said.
41
16
66
6,196
After 1 Full Year of Mining → No More Burning 😀 Dear Scott @scott_itlg / KV @kv_interlink , This is just my personal request and honest suggestion as a community member. I know the team is fully focused on Private Mainnet right now, and this may not be the right time. Still, I wanted to share this thought before it fades. 🟠Life is unpredictable. People go through: ➡️Health issues ➡️Family emergencies ➡️Job changes ➡️Personal problems Even loyal miners sometimes become temporarily inactive. Losing everything they mined for one full year feels more like punishment than motivation. Definitely we do have the recovering mechanism there, but is it really justified for loyal miners (1 year plus mining) to prove it again if something from the above issues happened with him/her. One year of commitment shows real loyalty. Giving them this small security (protecting their 1-year mined ITLG) would be a great human touch from the team and build long-term trust in the community. This will not make much difference to the project as conversion to vITLG will remain as it is, metrics will still be there but giving assurance to loyal and long term supporter will help the community grow. I hope you will take this into consideration. #InterLink #ITLG #ITL @inter_link @kv_interlink @reina_itl @itlx_defi @itl_fdn @scott_itlg
35
18
166
10,345
KYC Scam? I recently sold 10,000 Pi coins. 😲😲 I sold Pi coins before launch, at launch and I sold another 10,000 Pi coins just last month. (Proof attached). I made good money from Pi but the road was not easy. People who have genuinely earned from a project or run a successful business can give you honest advice and share real experiences. Not random influencers who jump from one seasonal project to another and never make significant money from them. Many of them earn primarily from subscribers and views by creating hype, FOMO, or FUD. I am not defending InterLink blindly. I am just giving them breathing space. Free mining projects have the same problems everywhere: Millions of users Limited budget Massive KYC cost if done through third-party Risk of fake accounts & bots Sudden huge sell pressure if everyone gets coins at once. If InterLink gives 5 million users their full allocation in one go, the market will crash hard. That’s not a scam — that’s basic economics. ➡️My Journey with PI's KYC System: Timeline of Initial KYC Problems 🟠Early Phase (2021–2022): “No KYC Slots vailable” One of the first massive complaints was: users not receiving KYC invitations “No slot available” errors accounts stuck for months Many users mined for years but could not even start KYC. Community reports repeatedly mentioned: accounts being “flagged” incomplete reviews no transparency on selection criteria no support response Pi Core Team explanation The Core Team said: KYC was being rolled out gradually they were prioritizing “real human verification” suspicious accounts required additional checks KYC capacity was limited They also claimed AI human validators were being used together. 🟠Massive Backlog Crisis (2022–2024) This became the biggest KYC controversy. Millions of applications were: stuck in “In Review” stuck in “Pending” stuck in “Tentative Approval” randomly reverted Some users waited: several months over 1 year even 2 years A major issue was inconsistency between: Pi App Pi Browser Mainnet Checklist Some users saw: “KYC Passed” in one place “Waiting” in another place Example community issue: 🟠Pi Core Team Bug Announcement (2022) One important announcement came after a major bug in 2022. The Core Team admitted that: a deployment/update caused incorrect “KYC Passed” statuses some users were accidentally shown as approved some migrations happened mistakenly migrations would be reverted during the 14-day pending period Community repost of the official announcement: This was one of the first public acknowledgements that the KYC system itself had technical failures. 🟠 “Tentative Approval” Problem This became one of the most controversial statuses. Users passed KYC partially but remained in: “Tentative Approval” Meaning: not fully approved not fully rejected unable to migrate fully Many users complained that: status never changed support never answered no clear reason was provided 🟠By 2025–2026, this issue was still ongoing. Pi Core Team explanation The team later said: tentative approval meant additional security checks AI fraud detection needed further verification some accounts triggered risk systems Community FAQ reposts also repeated this explanation. 🟠Name Mismatch & Identity Problems Huge numbers of users failed KYC because: nickname used instead of legal name spelling mismatch wrong country code old phone numbers underage users multiple accounts in family The problem became severe because many users joined casually years earlier without knowing KYC would later become strict. Pi eventually introduced: limited name correction appeals appeal systems some paid correction options But many users still complained about rejection loops. 🟠 Wallet Migration KYC Combined Issues (2024–2026) Later, KYC problems merged with: wallet creation failures migration errors disappearing balances 2FA problems Users reported: migrated Pi disappearing balance becoming zero migration resetting wallet creation stuck for weeks Reports and coverage: Pi Core Team’s Main Announcements About KYC A. “KYC at Scale is Difficult” The team repeatedly argued: traditional KYC providers were expensive Pi was trying to build a decentralized KYC system millions of users made this unprecedented They promoted: human validators AI automation community verification B. January 2024 KYC System Update One major official update stated: over 1.5 million applications were stuck algorithms were improved over 750,000 stuck cases were cleared Coverage of the update: This was effectively an admission that the earlier KYC system had major bottlenecks. C. Validator-Based KYC Expansion Pi later expanded: community validators rewards for validators AI human hybrid review According to later reports: each application could be reviewed dozens of times over a million people participated in verification tasks D. 2025–2026: Core Team Acknowledges Delays Continue Even after Open Mainnet progress, reports still showed: millions waiting tentative approvals migration blocks Pi updates claimed: 18M KYC verified users 16M migrated users additional users becoming eligible monthly But community frustration remained high because many early miners were still stuck. Major Criticisms From the Community Across Reddit and crypto communities, the recurring criticisms were: 1. Lack of transparency Users said: no exact rejection reasons unclear timelines vague announcements 2. Poor support Many users claimed: tickets unanswered appeals ignored no human assistance 3. Centralization concerns Critics argued: Core Team controlled migration timing KYC approvals were opaque balances could be frozen indefinitely 4. Endless delays The project repeatedly delayed: Open Mainnet migrations KYC clearing I made good money from Pi even after all the delays. Those who actually earned from free mining projects understand these struggles. That’s why I am not in a hurry to call InterLink a scam. I know these projects take time. I know KYC is painful. But patience has always paid off in such projects. What do you think? Are you still mining InterLink or already given up? Drop your thoughts 👇 @inter_link @kv_interlink @reina_itl @itlx_defi @itl_fdn @scott_itlg #InterLink #ITLG #ITL
17
5
40
6,836
Interlink Founders Disclosed. 😀 After Nicolas Bernad’s post, many people have started asking if the announcement is true. As this is not an official annoucement. That’s why today I’m showing you in a completely transparent way exactly how to fact-check this information using only official and public records. This is my own research. DYOR. Before we get into the facts, let me be very clear about who I am, because after watching my YouTube videos some people are commenting that “the company is paying him for positive feedback and defending the company." I am not a professional YouTuber or KOL. I am a corporate professional running a successful business. I think and behave like a corporate person, focused on facts, proper due diligence, and putting the community first. Creating false hype is simply not my style (something that many KOLs and YouTubers do these days). I started my YouTube channel because I fought against a fraud company for 4 years and saved crores of rupees for our Asian community, Indians, Bangladeshis, Nepalis, Pakistanis, and others. I have been associated with Pi Network since the 2020 lockdown because I was gathering knowledge on Blockchain and Crypto. I liked PI Networks vision and earned handsomely from Pi, but I didn’t scale it the way I am scaling InterLink. After I helped the community escape that fraud, they asked me to find and share a genuine project similar to Pi Network but better and safer. That is exactly why I started promoting InterLink. Let me say this very clearly once and for all: Community First is my only priority. I am not promoting Interlink for money, nor do I have any close personal relationship with any core team member. KV once said he will always with the community which genuinely impressed me, and since then I have truly believed in the project’s vision. I defend InterLink because I love and believe in its vision, and I counter negativity with facts. Every video I make on YouTube is purely for the community, to help you understand the real process and learn how to think about the project properly. ➡️Now let’s come to the topic. Fact Checks – InterLink Key Founders & Leadership: 🟠1. Benjamin Tran Position: Founder & Executive Chairman Fact Check here:Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) Official Company Registry → dnb.com/business-directory/c… (Clearly states “Key Principal = Benjamin Tran”). Note: Dun & Bradstreet is a 180 year old trusted global business intelligence company that verifies key principals using official government filings and cross-checked records. 🟠2. KV (@kv_interlink) Position: Co-Founder of InterLink Labs & Chairman of InterLink Foundation Fact Check here: Official InterLink Foundation announcements and verified project updates on X and community channels. He has been associated with us since the beginning, so I do not think any other proof required. 🟠3. Vince Caruso Position: Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) & Lead Media Advisor Fact Check here: Official Announcement on New To The Street’s own website → newtothestreet.com/video/new… (Confirms Vince Caruso, Founder & CEO of New To The Street, and the strategic partnership with InterLink Labs where he serves as CMO) 🟠4. Kenny (Kenneth A.) Timmering Position: Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Fact Check here: Official Announcement by InterLink Labs → x.com/inter_link/status/1963… (Confirms his appointment and credentials) All of the above information comes directly from public records, official websites, and verified company databases. You can check everything yourself. Stop spreading blind FUD. Do your own research and share the right information with the community. What do you think? Drop your thoughts in the comments 👇 #InterLink #ITLG #ITL @inter_link @kv_interlink @reina_itl @itlx_defi @itl_fdn @scott_itlg @Nicolas_itl
We’re excited to welcome Kenneth A. Timmering as Chief Financial Officer (CFO) at InterLink Labs Kenneth brings a strong track record of leadership and growth. He previously served as Vice President at @UFCGYM, where he helped drive expansion and global impact. As an active U.S. Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and a Chartered Global Management Accountant (CGMA, issued by AICPA & CIMA), Kenneth combines deep financial expertise with international business perspective, a rare mix of technical skill and strategic vision. He will also lead one of our most important goals: building the @inter_link ecosystem through negotiations not only with partners in the U.S. but also with private funding groups and marketplaces handling volumes of up to $3B per day. At @inter_link, Kenneth will help strengthen our mission of Building the Human Network by guiding sustainable growth, institutional adoption, and long-term value creation. His profile: linkedin.com/in/kenny-a-timm… #InterLink #ITLG #ITL
21
15
125
11,572
Big things are starting to become REAL for ITLX. Many people still think ITLX is “just another wallet” or only about crypto. But this update shows something much bigger is being built. Think of it like this When UPI started in India, at first people only used it to send money. But slowly it became the foundation for mobile recharge, bill payments, shopping, QR payments, subscriptions, and much more. ITLX seems to be taking a similar first step. 📱 Mobile Top-Up is going live first. Now some people may ask: “Why mobile recharge first?” Because almost everyone in the world understands it. Whether someone is rich or poor, in India, Africa, Europe, or America — people recharge their phones every day. It is simple. It solves a real problem. And most importantly, it proves the payment system actually works in the real world. ➡️Imagine this: You open the app → enter a phone number → choose a recharge pack → pay using USDT/USDC → recharge done ✅ 🟠No browser. 🟠No complicated crypto steps. 🟠No redirects. Everything inside the app. For me, the biggest takeaway is not the top-up itself… The real story is what this could lead to next: 💡 Bill payments 💡 Merchant payments 💡 Cross-border payments 💡 E-commerce 💡 Everyday crypto utility Every big payment network starts with one real use case. Maybe this Mobile Top-Up is just the first brick. Excited to see what comes next 😀 #InterLink #ITLG #ITL @inter_link @kv_interlink @reina_itl @itlx_defi @itl_fdn @scott_itlg
4
4
27
3,990
ITLG to ITL Staking Calculator Many of you have been asking for an easy and accurate way to calculate your ITL rewards based on different lock and vesting periods. I’ve built a simple, ready-to-use calculator using the latest official DAO Option 2 chart. Until the official calculator arrives in the InterLink app, you can use this to instantly check your ratio, total ITL and monthly release. 👉 mydigiworld.github.io/itlg-c… Drop your planned lock & vesting period in the comments 👇 #InterLink #ITLG #ITL @inter_link @kv_interlink @scott_itlg @reina_itl
19
24
106
9,349
Is Locking & Vesting a TRAP? 😳 There has been concern in the community that locking and vesting might be a trap set by the company. Let’s find out in the video. youtu.be/56XnEEvIQm0?si=Dm45… @inter_link @kv_interlink @reina_itl
2
19
2,486
Disagree Without Destroying Each Other In every long-term project, there will always be people who join with conviction, contribute deeply, and sometimes later leave with disappointment. ➡️That is normal. Some may share positive experiences. Others may raise concerns, criticism, or even expose things they personally disagree with. ➡️But when it turns into personal attacks, blame games, and ego battles between top people and ambassadors, it crosses the line. The community doesn’t enjoy watching personal fights. It creates negativity, doubt, and division. At the end of the day, personal attacks don’t help anyone. But this has been happening in the community for some time now. ➡️Let’s keep disagreements professional. But as a community, I think we should be careful about one thing: A project should never be judged only by emotions, personal fallout, or one individual’s experience, whether positive or negative. ➡️The better question is: 🟠Does the project still have a roadmap? 🟠Is development continuing? 🟠Are products/utilities being built? 🟠Is there progress or not? Healthy criticism is important. Tough questions are important. ➡️But blind trust and blind hate — both can be dangerous. At the end of the day, every person should research, observe, ask hard questions, and make decisions based on logic rather than emotions. ➡️Time eventually reveals the truth about every project. @kv_interlink @inter_link @scott_itlg @reina_itl @itlx_defi
5
5
22
2,136
My Interlink Balance Has Become Zero? 😳 Dear KV, After the recent update, I am receiving 5 to 10 messages daily from community members saying that their $ITLG balance has become zero. The issue is that the balance is now showing as ***** $ITLG (hidden with asterisks). While tapping on it reveals the actual balance, which is actually a good privacy feature 👍 but there is no clear visual indication that the balance is simply hidden. Because of this, many users are getting confused and panicking, thinking their tokens have disappeared. The current UI does not give any hint (like an eye icon) that the balance can be viewed by tapping on the asterisks. 🟠Suggestion: Could we please add a small eye icon (👁) next to the *****? This will immediately tell users that the balance is hidden for privacy and can be revealed by tapping. This small change will significantly reduce confusion and unnecessary panic in the community. Please look into this at the earliest. Thanks! Honest Critic @kv_interlink @scott_itlg @reina_itl @inter_link
26
8
94
9,652
I Paid My Insurance Premium Using InterLink Card 🟠No free $ITLG. 🟠No HCS boost. 🟠No extra mining rewards. I simply had crypto in my ITLX Wallet and the InterLink Visa Card gave me real convenience to pay my insurance bill directly — smooth, fast, and without any hassle. (Attaching the screenshot for proof 👇) This small real-life experience perfectly shows where InterLink is heading. 🟠Major Update from the Team: Once the Open Mainnet launches after the Private Mainnet, regular mining and group mining will permanently end. From that point onwards, only Validators will be able to secure the network and produce blocks. 🟠So the big question everyone is asking is: If mining stops, how will InterLink reach its goal of 1 Billion users? The answer is simple. Mining was always just the starting phase to quickly build the Human Network. ➡️The real long-term growth will come from actual utility and value creation: 🟠Seamless global payments via InterLink Visa Card Tokenized Businesses & 10,000 Payment Points 🟠Staking & Validator Rewards 🟠Mini-Apps, DeFi, and a full ecosystem Just like billions of people use UPI or credit cards today without any mining rewards, InterLink aims to attract massive adoption through real-world convenience and opportunities. The shift from “Free Mining” to “Real Economic Utility” is now officially beginning. What do you think? Will real utility be enough to bring crores of new users even after mining ends? Drop your honest thoughts below 👇 #Interlink #ITL #ITLG #ITLX @inter_link @kv_interlink @itl_fdn @itlx_defi @reina_itl @scott_itlg
5
9
115
8,200
Why You Should Not Stop Mining I have been receiving hundreds of messages from the community asking whether, after the recent incidents, we should stop mining and delete the apps. In this YouTube video on my channel @HonestCritic, I have explained in simple and neutral terms the logical reasons why you should not stop mining. I have not covered the operational, technical, or KYC-related aspects in this video — I will discuss those in my next video. But for basic miners, this video will answer the question of why you should not stop mining. #interlink youtu.be/2evd2kERJSM?si=3CoF…
2
3
12
3,036
How To Apply For the Interlink Visa Card Kindly check the video for the complete steps #interlink #itlg #itl
1
3
22
6,332
GAME-CHANGER ALERT – V5.0 IS OFFICIALLY APPROVED! KV Just dropped the biggest update yet: ✅ Version 5.0 has been approved on both Google Play Store and Apple App Store and is ready to go public! ✅ The InterLink Foundation Operations team is now setting up all procedures so that our Curators can officially start their work. ✅ Once everything is locked in, the full rollout will happen simultaneously for everyone. This is the moment we’ve all been waiting for — the official start of real verification, token activation, and the next phase of the Human Network. From mining in our rooms to now stepping into a fully verified, payment-ready ecosystem… we’ve come a long way! Who’s excited for V5.0 to go live? Drop your reaction below and tag your Linker squad 👇 Let’s make this rollout legendary! 💪 #interlink #itlg #ITLX_Defi @inter_link @kv_interlink @reina_itl @itlx_defi @itl_fdn
4
2
21
5,202