8 Photos and videos
The irony is people like you are exactly like neocons. You sniffed your own farts for so long circlejerking in your bubbles (think tanks for the neocons, podcasts for the lolberts) that you way overestimated your own importance
And got ran out of the party after defying the king
May 21
It's Trump's party, and it's a party comprising Boomercon coffin-dodgers, neocons, and effluencers who are paid to shill the policy preferences of the former by based-washing the policies of Bush the Lesser, Billy Kristol, and Alan Dershowitz. Mazel Tov!
1
1
232
Justin Amash was like Thomas Massie back in Trump’s first term and Charlie Kirk turned on him in favor of Trump.
So no, he wasn’t.
Hence why his wife knows him more than you.
May 22
I'm honestly starting to suspect that CK, primarily through weilding the membership of TPUSA, had significantly more power and sway with the GOP & Trump than any of us realized. More than Tucker or Hannity or Rush Limbaugh ever had.
And he was *beginning* to see things our way...
73
If you don’t like military aid to Israel, Netanyahu agrees with you.
Ironically for the opposite reason you do. lol
It’s not about the specific arguments, it’s about your obsession with one desert country on the other side of the planet that leads to those accusations.
May 21
Opposing foreign aid while we’re in massive debt isn’t “antisemitic”.
Calling out dark money influencing our elections isn't “antisemitic”.
Labeling it that way is just the right wing version of the left calling everything "racist."
See, both “sides” use the same authoritarian tactic of weaponizing accusations of bigotry to shut down policy debate.
Because while they may be “two sides”…they’re one beast. 💁♂️
1
40
Elon Musk backs Trump first and foremost.
Trump is the king.
May 21
Really disappointed in @elonmusk
He promised to help Massie
And then he just disappeared
31
I think the problems first started with removing the property requirements to vote.
Most people don’t know that the 17th amendment was actually one of the first real slopulist movements in the US. Something that sounds good at first glance and passed because of popular support, but ended up being disastrous because of the second and third order consequences.
24
It was notable at the time because people tend to get more conservative as they age, so Trump starting out stronger than normal there bodes well for the GOP.
Also why anyone who tries to rely on the youth vote in perpetuity never turns out well. People aren’t automatons.
May 22
What want to create a narrative that Gen Z is full of based America First chuds despite being the most gay and diverse group
18
You didn’t address the general point that the NAP prevents preemptive action. Which all my examples were about.
Well, it was fun playing. But you’re not interested in serious debate, and just want to get in your ‘gotchas,’ so have a good day.
1
27
I answered the question. lol
Goddamn this X refusing to let me reply bullshit is annoying. My apologies.
Oh, you’re a mind reader now! Fantastic! Okay, so you’ve already read my mind and know why you’re wrong. Great!
1
1
29
Yeah it does.
That has absolutely nothing to do with my question. Just answer it.
Also note you’re assuming “NAP” and “ancap”; plenty of libertarians are neither.
1
46
At this point, it was either Israel or Iran buying that seat. lol
Between the two, I choose Israel.
25
No, because getting to the point where I’m pointing my M2 Browning at you from my technical is already too late.
You’re dodging the question.
1
1
20
If I say “death to your family”, then start amassing a large arsenal, you know by the time I’m done, I will have such a firepower advantage that you will likely die.
The smart thing would be to kill me now, since a truly AnCap society would have no police force to call.
Really? Does it? So if you point a gun at me, I can’t shoot you until you shoot me first, according to the NAP?
3
2
109
It’s an example of how letting a problem fester because you don’t want to aggress first makes the problem worse.
When you’re dealing with a low trust society, you can’t think like that.
Explain to me why it’s necessary to preemptively deal with people in body armor and an APC. That’s silly.
Just say “an enemy army is amassing on your border, and if you just let it invade, you’ll be at a military disadvantage” and stop playing silly games.
14
The NAP does prohibit preemptive action.
Because you’re aggressing first in that instance.
See, now you’re changing the question. However, there’s still no ‘gotcha.’ Libertarianism does not prohibit the existence of militaries.
1
12
I think his wife knows him more than you do.
May 21
When Kirk was alive, he sided with Massie against Trump during the Epstein coverup
This is not theory or opinion, it’s on video
He told this directly to Megyn Kelly,
his other ally btw
14
If they’re already prepared to come at you, fully armed, decked out in body armor, with an APC, how are you reacting with just whatever home defense setup you have prepared?
Point is, preemptively dealing with them is required, rather than waiting for them to aggress first.
Someone is trying to get into your house. How do you prevent them?
This is not some kind of libertarian ‘gotcha.'
2
18
I support Trump because he wins and you don’t.
May 22
Trump is becoming my litmus test. If you’re a fan of his, I have no other choice but to assume you’re low-IQ, probably have a very tumultuous personal life, and have been completely stripped of your ability to form your own opinions.
P.S. Thomas Massie embodied everything Trump ran on in 2016. Trump knows this and hates it. In his eyes, he must always be seen as the king. He won’t accept anything less. Massie’s record was stellar, to the point where most Americans would even say Massie is more conservative than Trump. This was one of the primary reasons he was ousted.
18
How?
Don’t…let them in?
1
16