■ ACCOUNTABILITY IS ALSO TECHNICAL CoA has given the OVP (Sara Duterte) the “highest” audit rating—the same term used by the Kakampinks during Leni’s time. You do not audit without technical guidelines and rules, otherwise, magiging chaotic. Technicality is a bedrock of accountability and justice. Even tribal communities and indigenous justice systems have rules and technicalities guidelines. If you want to accuse someone, make sure na may ebidensiya ka. Hindi ka pwedeng mag-akusa ng walang ebidensiya tapos iyong inakusahan mo pa ang pag-eexplainin mo? The audacity. I mean, this rule applies to anyone. Kaya nga noong kinasuhan si Risa Hontiveros ng mga kriminal actions like kidnapping and wiretapping (recently, may allegation ng fake witness), nilagay nila sa korte. Pinilit ba nilang mag-explain si Risa sa public? No! Why? Kasi pati si Risa, kasama siya sa technicality na iyan covering accountability. Ganun din kay Sara. Sinasagot niya ang mga allegations sa proper venue; pero itong mga kalaban niya sa politika, dinadaan sa drama at politika kahit alam naman nilang may proseso ang lahat. Sa kabilang banda, nagtatanong kayo saan dinala ang CF. CoA na po ang may sagot diyan pursuant to existing guidelines and public disclosure. Sumusunod lang sa guidelines si Sara. Accountability is also following the guidelines. Lastly, nasa iba’t-ibang korte na ang mga kinaso nila sa confidential fund, andun ang proper venue. Wala sa political circus. Doon sinasagot ang mga issues na outside sa away politika. If you want to demand accountability, dapat alam niyo rin na ang accountability in the government is technical and procedural para maiwasan ang mga mahilig mag-akusa na “walang ebidensiya” na dinadala sa trial by publicity. Gusto niyo rin bang akusahan namin si Risa na ninakaw niya ang extraordinary funds niya dahil hindi naman ito transparent at wala siyang published accounting dito na may opisyal na resibo? At alam niyo bang walang resibo ito sa liquidation niya yet bilib na bilib kayo Kay Risa kung maka-akusa pero bingi-bingihan sa issue ng kanilang MOOE na mas malaki ang potential for abuse kaysa sa CF na audited ng CoA? Hindi kayo pro-accountability. Anti-Duterte lang kayo. Nakikisunod sa uso without understanding the law, guidelines, and technicalities that run our government processes—preventing the abuse of power ng mga mahilig mag-akusa. You know the potential danger of what you’re doing? Pwede ring gawin nila iyong ganitong technique niyo against you kapag si Sara ang maluklok sa kapangyarihan, at hindi naman na kayo makakapalag dahil kayo naman ang nag-set ng standard na ganito dapat ang accountability. Meaning, ibabato lahat ang akusasyon kay Risa (at mga anti-Duterte na humming ng accountability) tapos ilagay sila sa hot seat. Kung hindi satisfied, gagawan ulit ng issue at iimbestigahan hanggang sa masira ang image. Ganyan din ba ang gusto niyong mangyari kay Risa? What goes around, comes around.

■ THE SUPREME COURT, THE CONSTITUTION, AND THE EXPECTED (NOT SURPRISING) ADMIRATION OF THE LIBERALS IN TORRE'S CLOWNERY The SC ruled that the impeachment petition filed against ISD is unconstitutional. I’ve been consistent with my position that I’m pro-impeachment trial bloodbath. However, the Constitution is the bedrock of justice. Hindi po emotion natin ang basis ng justice. If may opinion naman tayong iba, they are still valid; but these opinions do not repeal the ruling and the wisdom of the honorable judges. In human psychology, normal lang naman po to feel defeated, sad, frustrated, and angry kapag natatalo sa argumento at pinaglalaban sa buhay. These emotions and reactions by the liberals and their followers are normal process to keep the ego intact. Iyong emotional reactions ng ibang mga anti-Sara to the point that they even went overboard by smearing the SC is actually predictable. However, their incapacity to control their emotional reactions could make them irrational like iyong mga nakikita nating reactions ng ilan sa kanila ngayon na walang nuance. That’s why it’s called a reaction, kasi walang explanation. Walang discussion. Walang policy position. In fact, De Lima said sorry for demeaning the wisdom of the Court. Ito iyong sinasabi ko. De Lima was too reactive emotionally that she failed to guard her logic and rational limits. Sadly, many of the followers of De Lima believed in her, only for De Lima to say sorry in the end. So paano na iyong mga nag-agree kay de Lima noong una? Nagpadala rin sa blind fanaticism against those they hate? Will they call out de Lima for telling a legal lie that smear the high Court? Of course, hindi nila iyan i-callout kahit umamin ng kamalian despite claiming that they are into honest, transparent, and accountable people. Kasi nga, its personality politics for some of them. It’s showbiz style. It’s all about emotional reaction. The might probably react with, eh kayong DDS, have you called out Dutae? Hah? Iyong mga sinabihan niyong tanga, blind followers, kulto, at mga panatiko ang mga DDS, but you expect them to call them out? Kayo ang nag-set ng standard ng moralidad, kaya walk the talk. Huwag ipasa sa iba ang moral standards na hindi niyo pala kayang gawin. Meanwhile, many of liberals-turned-Marcos supporters have enabled the PR stunt of Torre amidst calamities. Nawala na iyong mga comments nila like: “prioritization dapat” “napaka-insensitive” “nasaan ang Pangulo” Hindi ko marinig iyong mga tinig nila noong panahon ni Digong sa pag-criticize ng mga kakulangan ngayon. I thought they were critical of Digong because of their love for the country, accountability, and transparency na sila naman ang nag-claim. It turned out that it’s the personalities pala that they hate (or love). Parang showbiz. Hindi nga nila mabatikos iyong sarili nilang sinusuportahan na personality. Pero Ayun pala! They only said those words noon because they just hate Duterte, not because they believe in the wisdom of what they were saying. Kasi, if they believe in what they are saying, it should be applicable to everybody—hindi lang iyong hate nilang personality (kasi sila naman ang nagke-claim na sila lang ang tama, mababait, at righteous—so dapat consistent). Kita naman ngayon. They now minimize calling out the government because it no longer fits their personality politics na mahilig magpadala sa PR stunt, and even applaud the PR stunt even if it contradicts their previous sloganeerings. Remember the slogan “never again?” Ngayon, they are enabling the government they used to hate, and the political spectacle they are doing. Now they removed their mask. Their “never again” warcry was just “sunod sa uso” pala. Iyong mga mahilig sumunod sa uso alam niyo na, sila iyong totoong madaling mauto. Imagine the shift in their tone? Tapos after 30 years, magiging pro-Duterte ulit kapag nauso like iyong pagkawala ng Never Again ngayon? History repeats itself ba? Continued…

You don’t even see these people discuss their policy positions, they’d just do their usual personality showbiz politics that they crave over consistency and genuine love for the country, IMHO. They just react, they don’t discuss.

THE BAROMETER OF HYPOCRISY — Take note: I will block users that reply using adHom, memes, irrelevant topics, unreasonable toxic statements, or diversionary replies. I saw this on threads.net. I really love arguments that follow the Alicia Keys tune of “what goes around, comes around; what goes up must come down.” Kasi diyan mo mage-gauze iyong hypocrisy level ng kanilang arguments. Ito nga iyong mga sinasabi ko sa mga liberals at wokes na ang hilig-hilig magbalandra ng one-liner slogans like “no to corruption.” However, if you will ask them the details of what they are fighting for including its applicability sa mga kalaban nila sa politics, NGANGA sila. It turns out na hindi pala talaga nila naiintindihan ang pinaglalaban nila OR iyong slogan nila is for convenience only at para talaga sa idols nila at hindi para sa bansa. Sino ba ang mahilig mag-callout na immoral at bobo ang mga DDS, di ba mga wokes, liberals, at YellowPinks? They present themselves as warriors against corrupt leaders, but they stop doing it when their own camp is on the spotlight for alleged corruptions or incompetence. Regarding the pag-demand ng accountability kay Inday for alleged corruption dahil pro-good governance daw sila, wala pong pinipiling politiko ang slogan mo kapag nagbalandra ka. If you claim na mahal mo ang bansa, hindi lang dapat si Sara ang inaaway. Una, ano ba talaga ang purpose nila bakit sila nagbabalandra ng slogans? Of course, karamihan sa kanila is just for social aesthetics na parang make-up para magmukang cool, makabayan, at maganda sa paningin. Pero kapag tinanggal ang make-up, kita mo iyong mga tsismis sa balat. Ganyan ko ihalintulad ang hypocrisy ng mga wokes at liberals na mahilig sa slogans na “no to corruption” at kung ano-ano pa. Iyong “never again” ninyo sa mga Marcos, BUKING kayo na for aesthetics lang pala, pero deep inside mga pro-Marcos pala when it’s convenient for them. Asan na ang Never Again niyo na 30 years ninyong sinisigaw? Ngayon naman, “impeach Duterte.” Pero Malay natin, baka after 30 years or less magiging pro-Duterte din mga ito. Well, Hindi natin alam. Si Risa Hontiveros at Bam Aquino nga allies na ng Marcos eh. ANG AWKWARD! P.S. The allegations of corruption (Duterte) and the allegation of bribery (mga kalaban ni Sara) are both issues of corruptions. Wala po tayong proof na may bribery inasmuch as wala rin tayong proof na may malversarion of funds sa CF ni Sara as of this post. It’s just that, since you already accused Sara of crime from an allegation of corruption, you should also not be silent of the allegation of bribery. Both are forms of corruption kung totoong anti-corrupt kayo.