π A New Chapter Begins! π We're thrilled to announce a new editorial team at The European Journal of International Security - and some BIG changes to come! π Stay tuned as we unveil our vision for advancing scholarship and shaping the future of security research! #EJIS@MYBISA
π¨π³ "China, DIME, and innovative deterrence methodology: How authoritarian states react to deterrence activities through information" by Scott Fisher, @GraigKlein, Juris Pupcenoks & Juste Codjo.
ππ Open access - read here: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦
πͺπ NEW: "Resisting relegation to the rank and file: Explaining the effects of status seeking on military force structure" by Samuel Martin Seitz.
π Free to read here: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦
π·πΊπ Essential reading: "Too late to respond, too pressured to ignore? Path dependency and institutional change in the UKβs response to Russian hostile activities" from Ethem Ilbiz, Atakan Yilmaz, and Mike Edwards.
ππ More here: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦
πͺπ NEW: "Providing ontological security through analogies and metaphors: A leader approach" from Leslie E. Wehner.
ππ Open access - read here: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦
π€βοΈ "GenAI and synthetic foresight at the brink: The future of nuclear crisis decision-making" by James Johnson is an essential read on how GenAI reshapes strategic crisis decision-making.
ππ More here: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦
π¨π³π·πΊ New and open access: "In the crosshairs: Twenty-first-century superpower rivalry for Africaβs critical minerals" by Ron Matthews & Vlado Vivoda is an essential read.
π°π More here: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦
πͺπΊπΈ NEW: Constructivism and the Capitol riots: Beyond single dominant narratives, towards eventful sociology from Jack Holland & Ryan OβConnor.
ππ Open access - read here: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦
πΈπͺπͺ NEW: "The politics of the market and the return of Swedish total defence" by Bryan Mabee & Joakim Berndtsson.
ππ Read more here: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦
6
6
828
European Journal of International Security retweeted
that's a good summary of what chatbots do as well. they don't predict the future, they just say things that end up shaping it. epistemology more critical than ever.
π» NEW: "GenAI and synthetic foresight at the brink: The future of nuclear crisis decision-making" from James Johnson π
ππ Read more: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦
π» NEW: "GenAI and synthetic foresight at the brink: The future of nuclear crisis decision-making" from James Johnson π
ππ Read more: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦
2
5
371
European Journal of International Security retweeted
π¨ NEW: "Why USβChina relations have not escalated yet: Power rise, power transition, and perceptions of resolve" from Michiel Foulon and Gustav Meibauer.
ππ Read, in full, for free: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦
10
37
2,507
European Journal of International Security retweeted
ALT Virtual Conference 2027
Conflict and cooperation in a changing world
11-13 January
Online via Zoom
Submissions open: 5 May
Website: virtualconference.bisa.ac.uk
#VirtualBISA2027
BISA logo and a half blue with neon stripes, half white background
π¨π¨π³ NEW: "Why USβChina relations have not escalated yet: Power rise, power transition, and perceptions of resolve" from @michielfoulon & Gustav Meibauer.
ππ Read more here: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦
ππ¨ NEW ISSUE π¨π«
European Journal of International Security
Volume 11 - Issue 2 - May 2026
ππ Out now: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦@MYBISA
4
17
1,238
European Journal of International Security retweeted
πͺ"the concept of cognitive warfare overpromises, creating a false illusion about the amount of control actors can exercise over the minds of peoples on the adversaryβs side"
ππ NEW: "Cognitive warfare: Some sceptical observations from general strategic theory and affective science" from @SamoZilincik.
ππ Read in full here: cambridge.org/core/journals/β¦
2
4
450
European Journal of International Security retweeted
In a new paper for the @EJIntSec, my brilliant colleague @SamoZilincik draws from strategic theory and affective science to show that the concept of « cognitive warfare » is too flawed to be analytically and practically useful cup.org/3O769MT