@EQCF profile picture
Equality Case Files @EQCF

Providing information on litigation and legislation impacting LGBTQ rights. Find documents here: files.eqcf.org

Joined July 2011
  • Tweets 14,971
  • Following 498
  • Followers 3,164
1,155 Photos and videos
Equality Case Files retweeted
ACLU of Northern CA@ACLU_NorCal
5 Nov 2024
In California, you can register and vote until the polls close on Election Day! Learn more about same-day voter registration and get answers to all your voting questions at aclunc.org/ca-voting-rights.

ACLU
@ACLU
5 Nov 2024
If you live in: 🗳️Alaska 🗳️California 🗳️Colorado 🗳️Connecticut 🗳️DC 🗳️Hawaii 🗳️Idaho 🗳️Illinois 🗳️Iowa 🗳️Maine 🗳️Maryland 🗳️Michigan 🗳️Minnesota 🗳️Montana 🗳️Nevada 🗳️New Hampshire 🗳️New Mexico 🗳️Utah 🗳️Vermont 🗳️Virginia 🗳️Washington 🗳️Wisconsin 🗳️Wyoming Your state has in-person Election Day registration. You can register and vote TODAY.
4
6
5
2,344
Equality Case Files retweeted
Chris “Law Dork” Geidner
@chrisgeidner
18 Jul 2024
BREAKING: On a 2-1 vote, the Sixth Circuit tosses out Friends of George’s challenge to Tennessee’s anti-drag law, holding the group lacks standing. Nalbandian, a Trump appointee, writes. The decision only addresses standing, not the merits of the case. opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinion…
5
61
136
168,744
In Carpenter (NY photographer who wants to refuse services to same-sex couples), CA2 allows free speech claim to go forward (reversing district court), but affirms dismissal of all other claims & won't issue preliminary injunction. files.eqcf.org/wp-content/up…
1
3
306
Equality Case Files retweeted
Chris “Law Dork” Geidner
@chrisgeidner
24 Jun 2024
Altogether, SCOTUS granted certiorari in 7 cases this morning. They did not grant the petitions brought by the challengers to the Tennessee and Kentucky laws, which also raised a parental rights due process claim. Here is the full SCOTUS orders list: supremecourt.gov/orders/cour…
CERTIORARI GRANTED 23-477 UNITED STATES V. SKRMETTI, JONATHAN, ET AL. 23-824 UNITED STATES V. MILLER, DAVID L. 23-861 FELICIANO, NICK V. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 23-867 HUNGARY, ET AL. V. SIMON, ROSALIE, ET AL. 23-900 DEWBERRY GROUP, INC. V. DEWBERRY ENGINEERS INC. 23-975 SEVEN COUNTY COALITION, ET AL. V. EAGLE COUNTY, CO, ET AL. 23-997 STANLEY, KARYN D. V. SANFORD, FL The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

ALT CERTIORARI GRANTED 23-477 UNITED STATES V. SKRMETTI, JONATHAN, ET AL. 23-824 UNITED STATES V. MILLER, DAVID L. 23-861 FELICIANO, NICK V. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 23-867 HUNGARY, ET AL. V. SIMON, ROSALIE, ET AL. 23-900 DEWBERRY GROUP, INC. V. DEWBERRY ENGINEERS INC. 23-975 SEVEN COUNTY COALITION, ET AL. V. EAGLE COUNTY, CO, ET AL. 23-997 STANLEY, KARYN D. V. SANFORD, FL The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

1
14
51
9,119
Equality Case Files retweeted
Chris “Law Dork” Geidner
@chrisgeidner
24 Jun 2024
BREAKING: The Supreme Court will review whether bans on gender-affirming medical care for minors violate equal protection guarantees, hearing the appeal brought by the Biden administration in response to TN's law. More to come at Law Dork: lawdork.com/

Law Dork | Chris Geidner | Substack

The Supreme Court, law, politics, and more. Click to read Law Dork, by Chris Geidner, a Substack publication with tens of thousands of subscribers.

lawdork.com
10
89
171
163,421
Federal judge declares Florida's ban on gender-affirming care for minors unconstitutional and permanently enjoins its enforcement. Order here: files.eqcf.org/wp-content/up…
33
66
201
109,896
The 5th Circuit orders mandate withheld in the Llano County library book removal lawsuit. This could mean judges are considering an en banc (full court) rehearing.
Chris “Law Dork” Geidner
@chrisgeidner
7 Jun 2024
NEWS: In a 2-1 decision, the Fifth Circuit orders Llano County to put back several books on their library's shelves that they had removed based on content and viewpoint. The panel modifies but affirms the district court's injunction against the county. storage.courtlistener.com/re…
1
1
4
1,670
An Idaho jury unanimously sided with drag performer Eric Posey, awarding him over $1.1 million in a case against a blogger who made false claims that he had exposed himself at a pride event in 2022. nytimes.com/2024/05/26/us/er…

Idaho Drag Performer Wins Over $1.1 Million in Defamation Suit Against Blogger (Gift Article)

The jury unanimously sided with the performer in a case against a blogger who made false claims that the artist had exposed himself to a crowd at a pride event in 2022.

nytimes.com
2
8
263
UPDATE to @chrisgeidner report on Alabama judge threatening to jail LGBTQ civil rights lawyers. Lawyers are dismissing their emergency 11th circuit petition storage.courtlistener.com/re…

#7 in In re: James Esseks (11th Cir., 24-11618) – CourtListener.com

MOTION to withdraw for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioners Carl Charles, James D. Esseks, Latisha Faulks, Kathleen Hartnett and Milo Inglehart, to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Carl Charles,...

courtlistener.com
Law Dork@lawdorknews
21 May 2024
NEW LAW DORK: An Alabama Trump appointee is threatening to jail LGBTQ civil rights lawyers. A forum-shopping dispute that been ongoing for two years briefly reached the Eleventh Circuit on Monday. Also: More on Alito. And: Law Dork in the news. lawdork.com/p/alabama-burke-…
2
1
2
877
I didn't doubt it, only that in my quick skim, I hadn't noticed it.
139
4th Circuit panel 2-1 affirms district court denial of preliminary injunction in case of Maryland parents wanting notification and opportunity for opt-out when their children will be exposed to LGBTQ-inclusive books. - Opinion: files.eqcf.org/wp-content/up…
3
3
529
UPDATE: 11th Circuit just issued an order, "A judge of this Court withholds issuance of the mandate in this appeal." This could mean a judge has called for a vote for rehearing en banc. Can anyone think of what else this could be?
Equality Case Files@EQCF
13 May 2024
11th Circuit, 2-1, affirms district court ruling that defendants violated Title VII in denying gender-affirming care to transgender employee *because* the employee is transgender. Brasher dissents. Case is Lange v. Houston County, GA media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opin… #TransRights
1
3
997
11th Circuit, 2-1, affirms district court ruling that defendants violated Title VII in denying gender-affirming care to transgender employee *because* the employee is transgender. Brasher dissents. Case is Lange v. Houston County, GA media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opin… #TransRights
1
3
9
1,647
In Hecox, CA9 withdraws its opinion upholding PI blocking the #Idaho law banning transgender women from participating on women's sports teams, citing #SCOTUS action in Labrador (limiting PI to only named plaintiffs). Amended opinion to follow. See: files.eqcf.org/cases/20-3581…
1
231
In Kadel and Anderson (consolidated cases challenging exclusions for certain gender affirming care in (1) NC exclusion in state health plan and (2) WV Medicaid exclusion:;En banc 4th Circuit affirms district court rulings in plaintiffs' favor Opinion: files.eqcf.org/wp-content/up…
1
2
1
1,425
more replies
1
1
206
I just arrived in San Diego for a motions hearing and need to get to court, so this is a VERY brief post. Here's the vote split
2
1,089
Equality Case Files retweeted
Lauren McGaughy
@lmcgaughy
23 Apr 2024
ICYMI: Seattle hospital agrees not to treat #transgender youth from Texas, in person or remotely, in exchange for not having to turn over patient records to Attorney General Ken Paxton. Repost from @kbrooksharper: kut.org/texas/2024-04-23/ken… #txlege #LGBT #LGBTQ

Seattle Children’s Hospital won’t have to provide trans patient records to Texas under new settle...

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton suspected the hospital was helping Texas kids access puberty blockers or hormone treatments that are outlawed for juveniles.

kut.org
5
37
42
13,411
Equality Case Files retweeted
Chris “Law Dork” Geidner
@chrisgeidner
19 Apr 2024
Breaking: Indiana’s ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors will remain in effect for now, as the full Seventh Circuit denies the plaintiffs’ request to reconsider the panel’s order allowing the law to go into effect. Four judges would have reconsidered the panel’s order.
ORDER A motion requesting en banc reconsideration (DE 135) of this court’s orders (DE 124 & 130) was filed by Plaintiffs-Appellees on March 29, 2024. The motion was considered by all judges in regular active service, using the procedure for petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge in regular active service requested a vote on the motion. A majority of the judges in regular active service voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judge Rovner, Judge Jackson-Akiwumi, Judge Lee, and Judge Pryor voted to grant rehearing en banc. Accordingly, the motion requesting en banc reconsideration is DENIED.

ALT ORDER A motion requesting en banc reconsideration (DE 135) of this court’s orders (DE 124 & 130) was filed by Plaintiffs-Appellees on March 29, 2024. The motion was considered by all judges in regular active service, using the procedure for petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge in regular active service requested a vote on the motion. A majority of the judges in regular active service voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judge Rovner, Judge Jackson-Akiwumi, Judge Lee, and Judge Pryor voted to grant rehearing en banc. Accordingly, the motion requesting en banc reconsideration is DENIED.

9
38
57
25,870
Load more