How else do we drum it into the ears of civilized people?instagram.com/reel/DYBCW0OsS…

Hmmmh! instagram.com/reel/DZkZA0Zuz…

Horror! instagram.com/reel/DZW-CSJIt…

I do https know how else to state this.://www.instagram.com/reel/DXH6vwTiML0/?igsh=MTR5aW5wZWwwdThhZA==

'We Have Been Shouting For A Long Time': Oyo Community Residents Say Warnings Ignored As Terrorists Take Over Forests, Kill Villager | Sahara Reporters bit.ly/4vhGGAW

Terrorists Invade Hometown Of Former Spokesman For Kwara Governor, Kill Local Hunter | Sahara Reporters bit.ly/4gld6FL

Karma or coincidence? This is Rabe Abubakar in 2015, speaking as Army Spokesman, confidently talking about Nigeria “winning the war against terrorism.” Fast forward… the same terrorism he declared was being defeated is what ultimately caught up with him. Life really has a way of rewriting old statements. x.com/Oserume1/status/206100…

'Only Katsina Govt Can Explain How My Father's Corpse Was Retrieved From Bandits’ Den’ –Son Of Late Retd Maj. Gen. Rabe Abubakar | Sahara Reporters bit.ly/3SatKxV

Ex-Military Ruler Abdulsalami Abubakar Advises Me Privately, Never Attacks Presidents Publicly, Says Tinubu | Sahara Reporters bit.ly/4xLiF71

EXCLUSIVE: Tension In Kuje Prison As Inmates Protest Planned Transfer Of 300 Terror Suspects To 'Overcrowded Facility' | Sahara Reporters bit.ly/3RZabbZ

I got this on WhatsApp. Don’t even know who this gentleman is. Amazing how anybody who digs for the truth can eventually find it. 

The fell consequences of ejecting Mazi Nnamdi Kanu from the courtroom By ALOY EJIMAKOR In the theater of criminal jurisprudence, there exists a thin, unyielding line between the preservation of courtroom decorum and the outright annihilation of a defendant’s fundamental right to a fair trial. When a trial involves capital offenses, that line becomes an absolute iron wall. When Justice Omotosho, on 20th November 2025, ejected Kanu from the courtroom, he may have believed he was stamping his authority on a volatile proceeding. However, by continuing the proceedings in Kanu’s forced absence, especially while the defendant had openly expressed his lack of confidence in the court and while no counsel was present to bridge the gap, the learned trial judge committed an egregious constitutional error. The bedrock of Nigerian criminal justice is Section 36(6)(c) of the Constitution, which mandates that every person charged with a criminal offense is entitled to defend himself in person or by legal practitioners of his own choice. While statutory provisions like the Administration of Criminal Justice Act provide narrow windows for a trial to proceed when a defendant purposefully absconds, the rules radically shift when a defendant is forcibly excluded by the court itself. The fatal error here lies in continuing a high-stakes terrorism and capital-offenses trial with an empty dock and an empty defense bench. The Supreme Court of Nigeria held in Adeoye v. State (1999) that: "It is a fundamental principle of our criminal jurisprudence that a trial for a capital offense or serious felony must be conducted in the presence of the accused person." Keep in mind that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was not just absent; he was sent out. And to compound the gravity of the ejection, Kanu had no legal counsel present to defend his interests during this forced ejection. Under Nigerian law, a trial judge cannot comfortably lock a defendant out of the room and simultaneously look past the total absence of a defense team to stand in for the defendant. In Galadima v. State (2012), the apex court emphasized that: "Where an accused person is unrepresented by counsel in a serious criminal trial, especially one touching on capital punishment or severe felony, any proceeding conducted in his absence and without the aid of legal representation is a nullity." By forging ahead without Kanu and without a counsel for him, the court effectively turned an adversarial criminal trial into an ex-parte proceeding. What makes Justice Omotosho’s insistence on proceeding even more untenable is the explicit lack of confidence in him by Kanu prior to the ejection. When a defendant forcefully raises a reasonable apprehension of bias, the judge’s primary duty is not to push forward to prove his stoicism; it is to take a pause. The Supreme Court in Deduwa v. Okorodudu (1976), held that: "A judge must be indifferent to the parties and should completely insulate himself from the heat of the battle." Instead of resorting to an adjournment to allow tempers to cool, the judge over-reacted by expelling the very man crying foul, and then continuing with the proceedings. To the reasonable observer, the optics are damning: a judge clearing the room of a so-called unruly defendant, then quietly wrapping up the case in the dark. Courtroom misconduct, perceived or real, by a defendant can be frustrating, and judges are human beings prone to exasperation. But the law provides tools to manage such situations, none of which includes conducting a capital trial while the defendant is locked in a holding cell and his defense table is completely bare. Thus, Justice Omotosho’s decision to continue the proceedings under these precise conditions was perverse and represents a total collapse of due process that will surely shock the conscience of the appellate court.

“Nigeria’s Insecurity Is Beyond Our Government, Only God Can End It” — Tinubu’s Defence Minister Matawalle Amid Rising Killings and Abductions Across the Country parallelfactsnews.com/nigeri…

Abducted Nigerian Major-General Rabe Abubakar Dies In Terrorists' Captivity | Sahara Reporters bit.ly/4vblNr1

Luxury cars or kidnapped children?

Some Igbo history…

Freed Victim Claims Kwara Traditional Ruler Died In Bandits Captivity Despite ₦21million Ransom Payment | Sahara Reporters bit.ly/3QzKgXS

BREAKING: Bandits Sack Kwara Communities, Kidnap Several Persons In Midnight Raid, Kill Resident | Sahara Reporters bit.ly/4ehE3I1

BREAKING: Sowore, Others Fight For Breath As Lawless Policemen Fire Teargas At June 12 Protesters In Abuja | Sahara Reporters bit.ly/4e3xIB4