🇳🇱 Netherlands 2 – 2 Japan 🇯🇵
The Netherlands used their usual 4-3-3, a fairly rigid positional structure that can become a situational 2-3-5 or 3-2-5, with Dumfries pushing up, Summerville moving inside, and Gravenberch dropping into midfield.
The Netherlands are not very fun offensively. Their game depends on individual inspiration from one of their front players, like Gravenberch and Summerville on the second goal, or on set pieces, where they are physically stronger than Japan, as in the first goal. Their structure is very rigid, and you don’t really see many rotations or movements. In exchange, they don’t suffer much in defensive transitions.
Japan are well organized in their usual 5-4-1, moving into a 4-4-2 when the ball goes wide, with Nakamura pushing up and Ito shifting across. They are well concentrated throughout the game, but they don’t have much in transition without Mitoma.
Japan attack in a 3-2-5, but they can also attack in a 4-3-3 with Kamada dropping between the centre-backs. These are mainly their two structures. It’s obvious that Japan are well coached with the ball. They are positionally quite rigid as well, but they have more counter-movements and patterns to progress.
I was about to write that Japan are very good between the boxes, but not in the boxes, and that cost them the game. But Japanese players are stubborn, and they got a goal from a corner, where the Netherlands should be much more dominant.
A well-deserved point for Japan.