Militante santé @solenntango.bsky.social Asso @winslow_la 🐘 338ppm ancienne Prof de lycée & université. CL cardiovasc illness : "in ffp2 we trust"

Joined July 2009
576 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
1 Aug 2024
Heureuse d’épingler 2 éléments auxquels j’ai participé : cet article👇
😷 65 MILLIONS DE COVID LONG ET ÇA CONTINUE ! Parce que le silence tue mais que l'information donne du pouvoir, @actupparis et @winslow_la dressent un état des lieux de la pandémie de COVID toujours en cours. 👉 Lire notre texte et nos exigences ici : winslow.fr/65-millions-et-ca…
4
18
47
22,820
« Scalability was a deliberate design consideration. » « If successful, RECOVER-ENERGIZE will provide evidence for two symptom-targeted interventions based on PEM status: rehabilitation to enhance exercise capacity and quality of life in those without PEM,
Researchers : Lucinda Bateman, Bateman Center (that made the minimizing-LC-guide). Emily Taylor, solve ME. How on earth can LC orgs & advocates let them do this with LC funds.
1
1
60
Absence of PEM is not safety. And exercice don’t cure any non-stabilised chronically ill person. The results of this, if they don’t have any major event, will be so harmful for us LC patients. #LongCovid #Minimisation
3
2
49
Solenn TANGO retweeted
Long Covid Cases Hidden By Widespread Preference For Literally Any Other Diagnosis
7
238
727
6,104
Solenn TANGO retweeted
We all should be shocked of this trial. It’s basically dangerous for everybody suffering from LC.
I have to raise my severe concerns over this RECOVER trial. Exercise can be dangerous in Long Covid even without PEM (e.g. cardiovascular risk). "Structured exercise-pacing" can be dangerous with PEM-like manifestations. At any rate, exercise is no cure for Long Covid
4
9
783
Solenn TANGO retweeted
I have to raise my severe concerns over this RECOVER trial. Exercise can be dangerous in Long Covid even without PEM (e.g. cardiovascular risk). "Structured exercise-pacing" can be dangerous with PEM-like manifestations. At any rate, exercise is no cure for Long Covid
RECOVER-ENERGIZE will test 2 Long COVID strategies based on PEM status. Rehab for exercise intolerance without PEM and structured pacing for PEM, with safeguards to avoid exertional harm. medrxiv.org/content/10.64898…
9
50
201
8,686
Researchers : Lucinda Bateman, Bateman Center (that made the minimizing-LC-guide). Emily Taylor, solve ME. How on earth can LC orgs & advocates let them do this with LC funds.
RECOVER-ENERGIZE will test 2 Long COVID strategies based on PEM status. Rehab for exercise intolerance without PEM and structured pacing for PEM, with safeguards to avoid exertional harm. medrxiv.org/content/10.64898…
2
9
20
1,428
@K_Bishof @C19LH_Advocacy maybe? can anyone tell me if some LC org in recover said ok for putting at risk LC folks without PEM (yes exercice is still a risk for them), while letting the others without help - with pacing ?
2
4
171
Solenn TANGO retweeted
I actually think the Covid Conscious are amazing people. It takes a lot of strength to survive in a world that is almost wholly against you. Sticking to your guns and continuing to share what you know to be real.
29
192
1,297
10,721
Solenn TANGO retweeted
This is extremely damaging. PEM is not the defining factor as to whether exercise is safe or dangerous in long Covid.
RECOVER-ENERGIZE will test 2 Long COVID strategies based on PEM status. Rehab for exercise intolerance without PEM and structured pacing for PEM, with safeguards to avoid exertional harm. medrxiv.org/content/10.64898…
3
6
29
1,928
Eeeet voilà. Honte sur celleux qui ont participé à ce narratif. 😤
RECOVER-ENERGIZE will test 2 Long COVID strategies based on PEM status. Rehab for exercise intolerance without PEM and structured pacing for PEM, with safeguards to avoid exertional harm. medrxiv.org/content/10.64898…
1
3
16
547
Lucinda Bateman dans les chercheurs. Évidemment.
2
5
154
La dernière chose dont on avait besoin c'est que Ruffin récupère le Covid Long pour la plus grande joie de Margulies (Printemps Républicain) et en confondant le Covid Long et l'EM 🙄🤦‍♀️ Les 2 millions (sous estimation) c'est bien 2 millions de Covid Longs (pas CL et EM). 1/2
1
16
24
1,301
Necessary reminder 🧵, as SARS-Cov-2 denial, misinformation surrounding LongCovid, and the distortion of this multisystemic disease while confronting psychologizers are reaching peak levels, also from individuals who should support us.
About Alan's article : Do the people who constantly conflate CL with ME, decoupling LC from its cause and claiming it’s "too broad", "confusing" and so on, realise that they’re doing the same thing as the LC psychologisers, who also constantly try to detach LC from SARS-CoV-2 ?
2
4
145
Solenn TANGO retweeted
"We shouldn't overreact before we have definitive proof." It's a common argument in public health discussions, especially when new risks emerge and uncertainty remains. But public health isn't a criminal trial. The principle of "innocent until proven guilty" exists to protect people from unjust punishment. Pathogens are not people. Viruses don't have rights, intentions, or due process claims. They spread, mutate, disable, and kill while we debate evidence thresholds. The precautionary principle offers a different framework: when there is a credible risk of serious harm, lack of complete scientific certainty is not a reason to delay protective action. From asbestos and lead to tobacco and airborne disease transmission, history has shown the cost of waiting for absolute proof before acting. In this new article, Naomi Bar-Yam explores why public health must be guided by precaution, not certainty, and what that means for emerging threats like Andes hantavirus. Read the full article: whn.global/due-process-for-p… #PublicHealth #GlobalHealth #HantavirusAndes #Hantavirus #AndesHantavirus #HealthPolicy #Pandemic #AirborneTransmission #Ebola #COVID #COVID19 #LongCOVID #InfectionPrevention
2
34
76
3,763
About Alan's article : Do the people who constantly conflate CL with ME, decoupling LC from its cause and claiming it’s "too broad", "confusing" and so on, realise that they’re doing the same thing as the LC psychologisers, who also constantly try to detach LC from SARS-CoV-2 ?
3
12
43
2,485
David Tuller’s answers to Alan’s article are so illustrative of that. Allowing to Alan all the things that doesn’t fit the mix, and never linking LC to the pandemic and its health burden, while disqualifying the LC etiological définition chosen by patients themselves.
1
15
153
Ex : we know now that LC patients has an elevated associated risk of MACE. Nobody seems to care that brain retraining is « forgetting symptoms », getting used to it, which is dangerous here ? - advising this to pwLC, may also lead them to underestimate cardiovasc alarm bells
2
16
293