So apparently DPI's public response to
@ReformingGovt's open meetings lawsuit is to combine a strawman argument an ad hominem attack. Original.
First, the strawman. Simply because DPI attended the legislative oversight hearing in April '26 (although to be clear, Superintendent Underly refused to attend and sent two members of her staff who were not even employed in June '24 when the waterpark conference took place) does nothing to remedy the open meetings violation that IRG alleges took place at the waterpark conference. While maybe a cute argument, it is utterly useless for purposes of responding to an alleged open meetings violation.
Second, the ad hominem. This is the DPI spokesperson's statement:
“However, more than two years after the fact, a special interest group with a well-documented political agenda continues to recycle unfounded accusations, diverting public resources and agency time away from the work that matters most: supporting Wisconsin students, educators, and schools.”
Yes, IRG is center-right, but as a 501c3 focused on real policy solutions, I'm not sure it fits the mold of your typical "special interest group." And frankly, I'm curious to see the support for the claim IRG has a "well-documented political agenda." Again, IRG supports smaller, more efficient government, transparency and government accountability. We have criticized both sides of the aisle. If one side receives more criticism than the other, it's because that side doesn't support the substantive principles IRG exists to advance. That's how the policy world works.
Looking forward to seeing the answer in mid-July.
Thanks to
@HeartlandPostWI,
@thecentersquare,
@DairylandSent,
@WIExaminer,
@EricWimberger, Wisconsin Public Radio, and others for the balanced coverage.