Shout out to the the lead trader and the copytrade @polygun_ for this 6X win. Have never paid attention to basketball but its awesome to catch action like this.

Ilia Topuria vs Justin Gaethje in UFC Freedom 250 Who are you backing?

World Cup 2026 Copy Trade Results Day One: 3 Predictions / 3 Wins 153% Total Return Set your own fixed amount and automatically mirror every prediction ⚽️ Start copying now: t.me/PolyGunSniperBot?start=…

The intersection of gaming (or gamers) and the financial markets will create the next cohort trading superstars. We are building the infrastructure to support the next generation of elite investors and traders. Join us in the arena.

We're excited to team up with @polygun_ the largest PolyMarket bot to help make trading simple. Starting today, 100% of player fees generated through the America referral link will be used for buybacks. Happy trading.🇺🇸 t.me/PolyGunSniperBot?start=…

It only takes one trade... polymarketanalytics.com

🚨INSANE: Polymarket trader makes $3,900 EVERY DAY trading the 2028 Democratic presidential markets They're up over $79,000 overall.

What does this Polymarket trader know? They've won every trade on Fed interest rate markets.

Introducing Duels Trade perps in gamified formats with instant payouts.

Good morning guys. If you keep a market open for trading, you should accept evidence that comes out within that timeframe. If my trades were valid, The legally issued proof from MSTR should be as well. Otherwise you're scamming users. Do the right thing Polymarket

Privacy by default. app.arcaneprivacy.com

Hey @Polymarket , do the right thing here.

Let’s cut through the noise. If you ask today, “Did MSTR sell Bitcoin before May 31?” the honest answer is yes. Nobody serious would say no. That is what the market asked. It did not ask whether MSTR disclosed the sale before May 31. It asked whether MSTR sold any Bitcoin before May 31. People who traded this market knew how MSTR reporting works. Everyone watching STRC, MSTR, and SEC filings knew the 8-K would likely come on the next business day. That means any sale between May 26 and May 31 could only be confirmed after May 31. This was obvious to serious traders. So if Polymarket’s position is “anything confirmed after May 31 does not count,” then the market became impossible for YES after May 26. Unless Michael Saylor randomly shouted “we sold Bitcoin” before midnight, YES could never be proven under that logic. But the market did not close on May 31. Everyone waited for the filing. Then the filing came out and confirmed what YES buyers were betting on: MSTR sold Bitcoin before May 31. The NO argument does not come from the title. It does not come from the main rule. It does not come from the actual event. It only survives because Polymarket added an interpretation that turns “sold by May 31” into “disclosed by May 31.” I have spoken with legal advisors, including top-level counsel in Asia. If this resolves NO, I believe affected users have a serious path to challenge it, including collective legal action. The rule said sells. MSTR sold. That should be the end of it. @Polymarket

I have formally delivered a legal demand letter, prepared with legal advisors and counsel, to Adventure One QSS Inc. d/b/a Polymarket, the Panama-incorporated entity publicly identified with Polymarket’s international platform. This matter will be pursued under applicable Panamanian law and other relevant jurisdictions. The rule said “sells,” not “discloses.” I will continue pursuing every lawful path available until this receives a fair review.

I was just scammed for $500K by Polymarket. I am "willo2", the top holder of YES on "MicroStrategy sells Bitcoin by May 31st". Here's what happened:

I am prepared to hold @Polymarket legally accountable if this market ignores its written rules. I am offering a $10,000 bounty for the best lawyer/legal team to help challenge this resolution. Prediction markets cannot invent disclosure-timing rules after the fact.

Official Statement Regarding the Polymarket MicroStrategy Market I have contacted multiple legal advisors, partners, and people familiar with crypto and prediction market disputes regarding the Polymarket market “MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026?” I accept that I took risk. My position was aggressive, and maybe I was greedy. But risk-taking does not change the facts, and it does not allow a platform to apply an unclear or unwritten rule after real money has already been placed. The written rule said the market resolves YES if MicroStrategy sells any of its Bitcoin by the date in the title. It did not clearly say the sale had to be publicly disclosed by May 31, filed in an 8-K by May 31, or confirmed before the deadline. A sale date and a disclosure date are not the same thing. If Polymarket intended this to be a disclosure-based market, the rule should have said so clearly. Ordinary users read “sells any Bitcoin by May 31” as an event-based condition, not a disclosure-timing condition. Any ambiguity was created by the market wording itself. I purchased 49,695.76 YES shares for approximately 35,000 USDC. This is real money, and this issue deserves serious review. I will continue improving my legal materials, collecting evidence, and contacting relevant legal support. I will pursue this matter to the end through every available lawful channel. I am not asking for special treatment. I am asking for the written rules to be respected, the facts to be addressed directly, and this market to be reviewed fairly. Prediction markets only work when users can trust that words mean what they say. @Polymarket @PolymarketHelp

If @Polymarket resolves this Saylor sale question to a no it will be the end of their business, IMO. When you tell users to reject what is in front of their eyes and ears and claim to be a 'truth-finding' business, it is insulting. Certainly it is deserving of lawsuits, and is just so laughably obviously wrong that it defies reason.

Your Solana wallet is a glass box. Anyone with your address can read your balance, your counterparties, your patterns, your routine. #️⃣🔒 @ArcanePrivacy gives you the option to close the lid. A non-custodial privacy protocol on Solana that breaks the public link between your wallets. Deposit. Wait. Withdraw. A zero-knowledge proof confirms the transfer is yours without revealing who you are. Sanctions screening through Range keeps bad actors out without breaking what the protocol is for. Hashlock reviewed every contract and every zero-knowledge circuit, end to end. The reports are public. So are the fixes. Privacy should always be your right. It is the default for cash, conversation, and correspondence. Solana should not be the exception. 📘 Full audit: hashlock.com/audits/arcane 🌐 arcaneprivacy.com