The Full-stack Trading Infrastructure for the Next Generation of Finance

Joined May 2024
593 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Deposit on one chain. Trade across all of them. In the latest Euclid demo, @chouchani9 deposits $SOL and instantly: → Trades equities, perps, and indices → Withdraws back to Solana, no bridges Watch the demo of what's coming soon 👀
23
45
69
2,375
Before the shipping container, every port loaded cargo its own way. ✦ Every cargo shape needed its own crane ✦ Endless reloading at every stop ✦ Global trade crawled Then one standard changed everything. Liquidity today is still in that pre-container era. Euclid is the standard it's been waiting for.
19
40
54
718
How many will you walk away with? Start collecting ↓ planet.euclidprotocol.io/

12
35
39
361
28 Euclid stamps in total. You earn them as you complete quests and hit milestones. ✦ Most people will get a handful. ✦ Some will collect the Epics. ✦ Almost nobody walks away with both Legendaries. Early Explorer means you saw it first. The Million Mark means you were there when it hit.
16
25
39
995
Imagine depositing $SOL, trading S&P 500, Bitcoin perps, and tokenized gold from one account, then withdrawing to any chain when you're done. No bridging or gas juggling. Non-custodial the entire way. That's Euclid Prime: the feel of a CEX, none of the custody. Waitlist opens soon. Follow 🔔 so you're early.
28
43
59
1,029
Euclid's Liquidity Consensus Layer (LCL): the unified liquidity standard for DeFi. ✦ 40 integrated networks across EVM, Cosmos & Solana ✦ Smart routing in <200ms over a 30,000 node graph ✦ Atomic settlement, no bridging ✦ Every balance backed 1:1 by on-chain escrow, no wrapped IOUs
23
47
69
828
You didn't lose money to slippage. You paid a tax. Nobody ever showed you the invoice. Here's what fragmented liquidity actually costs you ↓
23
40
60
990
Every cross-chain trade bills you four times: → Slippage from shallow, isolated pools → Bridge fees just to move the asset → Wrapping risk while it sits as an IOU → Time, every block you wait for finality The liquidity exists. $20–30B of it. It's just scattered across hundreds of protocols and dozens of chains. You're not trading against the market. You're trading against a fraction of it.
1
2
9
378
Euclid removes the line items. → Slippage: one deep pool per pair, every chain → Bridge fees: no bridge to cross, nothing to pay → Wrapping risk: assets stay native, never an IOU → Time: atomic settlement, no blocks spent waiting The tax was never necessary. Learn more: euclidprotocol.io
1
8
293
Good Morning ☕️ Nice people respond 😌
28
42
60
766
OFFICIALLY CALLED UP to the DeFi national team ⚽
23
43
63
1,272
Bridges have leaked billions to hackers. You still use one every time you move assets across chains, but you keep using because no one gave you another option. ✦ Your assets get wrapped into IOUs ✦ Your funds sit locked in a contract ✦ That contract becomes a honeypot waiting to get drained The safest bridge is no bridge. That's what we built.
22
43
66
1,673
While everyone farmed the next incentive, We are building the thing that makes the incentive game obsolete. Quiet builders. Loud results. The loud part? It starts soon.
31
46
67
1,363
There's $20–30B of liquidity in DeFi. And it's the same $20B getting recycled across new chains every year. Every protocol fights for the same mercenary capital. Incentives dry up → liquidity leaves → protocol dies. DeFi doesn't have a liquidity problem. It has a liquidity architecture problem. Euclid connects it.
25
46
71
1,530
On-chain orderbooks didn't fail because of performance. They failed because of an architectural choice. Each one tried to match orders and hold liquidity in the same isolated silo. What most get wrong ↓
24
42
75
1,267
Every fast engine built the same mistake. ✦ Liquidity stayed trapped inside its own system ✦ Couldn't talk to AMMs. Couldn't talk to each other. ✦ A fast orderbook with shallow liquidity always loses to a slow pool with depth Speed was never the problem. Isolation was.
1
1
8
396
The right question was never "How do you run an On-chain Orderbook?" It's what if one order could tap every source of DeFi liquidity at once: orderbooks, AMMs, pools, all unified? That's what Euclid is.
1
1
9
327
DeFi was never short on liquidity. It was short on a place to settle it. Euclid fixes that. → One pool per pair, every chain, always → Atomic settlement, no bridges, no wrapping → Route $USDC$ETH$SOL in a single transaction Your assets never leave home.
22
44
70
1,174
Zero fragmentation on the pitch. Allez Paris ⭐⭐
22
40
66
1,781
We tried to draw
20
41
72
1,311