the first trillionaire is an african american, let that sink in

RT @JakeMunro: This is what cultural enrichment actually is.

Genetic predisposition for violence in roosters that can be removed from gene pools? Well. How about that.

If I said the words that he can freely say, the post would be automatically flagged and buried even more than usual.

Fkin A, she's right. Displace the students in critical fields, and you lock invaders in place in so many ways. Evil is definitely the best way to describe this. Move people in education up the "traitors" list.

This woman claims to be on the Board of Pardons and Parole in Texas She allegedly posted this after Karmelo Anthony was found guilty. We reached out to @TDCJ but they declined to respond

TOS would get me if I said what I really wanted to about this.

What's happening in Ireland isn't a riot. It's a Counteroffensive. Call it what it is.

Hey @DeptofWar what kind of soldiers are you guys using there?

What terrifies me about this attempted beheading is the potential backlash against peaceful beheaders.

every tweet on my timeline is "fuck niggers" and im smashing the like button

Niggas are dumb bro

White people don't season they pineapple?

Your daughters will be raped and your sons will be murdered and the british government will arrest you if that upsets you. Enough is enough.

Once you see this, you can never unsee it.

So-called age verification for social media is spreading across the world, framed as an effort to create a safer internet for children. In reality, age verification lays the foundation for a fully controlled internet. The age verification rush must be slowed down, and politicians need to recognize the consequences of different types of legislation and systems. Age verification is the wrong approach to fix “the social media problem” The big tech social media companies are bad. Their business model is bad; it is based on mass surveillance and manipulation, and they cooperate with governments in mapping entire populations. But age verification is fundamentally the wrong approach to preventing children from using big tech social media platforms. Introducing age verification is based on coercion; the state forces social media companies to verify their users’ identities. But the big tech social media platforms already know which of their users are children. Their business model depends on knowing this. They know how old users are, and they know exactly what type of person they are. As age verification is based on coercion, politicians could instead force platforms to stop doing the things politicians consider harmful to children, or force them to block children (again, they know who they are) from using their services. But instead, politicians seek to massively invade everyone’s privacy and undermine democratic rights on a global scale. In other words, the latter is the real objective – they do not want to protect children; they want to impose control. Slippery slope of age verification It is undeniable that age verification threatens freedom of expression, risks increasing mass surveillance, and is likely to lead to censorship. It will not only shrink the online world and reduce young people’s right to privacy (for example, if VPN services were to be restricted); but also risks becoming a significant step toward a controlled internet for everyone. Most age verification is identity verification Most countries are now considering introducing age verification systems, meaning that everyone would have to identify themselves either to the service/website they want to use or to a third party capable of linking them to their activity on that service or website. This is not age verification but identity verification, and the consequence is therefore that freedom of information is restricted (you can no longer visit regulated websites anonymously) and that you can no longer post anonymously on social media. This is a major problem in countries like the UK and Germany where the police conduct raids on people’s homes for posting content on social media that the authorities dislike. Or in the United States, where authorities are trying to pressure tech companies into revealing the identities behind accounts protesting ICE. Social media identity verification removes important tools for activists in countries where criticizing those in power is dangerous. Restrictions on app store or operating system level Some countries are looking to impose identity verification at the app store level or even within the operating system itself. This is an exciting experiment, since this is possible to circumvent using open-source operating systems. Some countries are already looking to include open-source systems. Since open-source systems cannot be controlled, politicians would ultimately need to ban devices that are not controlled by the state. The end point: telescreens like those in Orwell’s 1984, devices that both monitor you and broadcast only the information approved by the state. The Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) alternative and the EU The EU has presented its own age verification app as “completely anonymous”. The idea is to use Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) cryptography to break the link between the age credential issuer (EU governments) and the regulated services/sites. Currently, the EU app does not have ZKP functionality, contrasting Ursula von der Leyen’s claim that the app ”is technically ready to be used”. But more importantly, the app is currently designed to always function without ZKP technology; if ZKP is unavailable, the app falls back to a non-ZKP model. Even if fully developed ZKP technology could be implemented in the future, it would remain an optional extra feature that countries may choose to disable and that the EU could remove at any time. Read more on our site. mullvad.net/blog/age-verific…

Nobody stole your art, you goober. This is another Leftist lie that appeals to stupid people. AI maps out what a "thing" looks like against billions of other images and uses this information to create a wholly new image. It never saves or stores the images, that's not the point. What it does is create a mathematical model based on it. Think of it like an algorithm to describe a cat. If you had pictures of a million cats you would be able to draw what a cat looked like in every conceivable way, and could even develop a formula to let you do so. This information (catformation?) would be wholly unique from any feline or image of a feline that has ever existed in its own right, but it would still look like "your" cat because all cats look like your cat to some degree or another. But it's not theft and no serious person thinks so.

I recently reached the last round on a quiz show. The final question was: "What's the one thing no Trans women has ever done?" I didn't know the answer, so I said "Pass". They said "That's correct" and I won the prize.😡

in honor of pride month, lets share some lgbt achievements!! - Lesbian Relationships have a domestic violence rate of 43% - Lifetime suicide attempt rates for transgender adults often cited around 40% - Gay and bisexual men (MSM) account for a disproportionate share of new HIV infections: ~71% of estimated new US infections in 2022 - LGBT adults are incarcerated at roughly 3 times the rate of the general population. LGB people: ~1,882 per 100,000 vs. 612 general. - Sexual minority individuals report higher rates of experiencing childhood sexual abuse (CSA): meta-analyses show 3-4x higher odds in some studies. - Adult children reporting a parent with a same-sex relationship showed higher rates of reported sexual abuse (e.g., ~23% for lesbian mothers' children vs. 2% intact biological families)