Antisemitism is always a means rather than an end; it is a measure of the contradictions yet to be resolved. It is a mirror for the failings of individuals, social structures, and State systems. Tell me what you accuse Jews of—I’ll tell you what you’re guilty of.(Valery Grossman)

Trump hat gerade vor dem iranischen Regime kapituliert. Was für eine Shitshow.

Wenn ich sowas über die AfD schreiben würde, dann wäre meine Kommentar-Sektion voll mit Rechten Heulsusen, die den Untergang der Demokratie sehen, weil man ja “eine normale Partei” ausgrenze.

Es ist wieder Zeit für diesen Tweet

One of the most troubling aspects of the Palestine Action/Elbit case is the moral psychology involved. It is what happens when a political cause becomes a total identity and creates the opportunity for malign actors to exploit it. Once “Palestine” is transformed from a cause into a sacred symbol of moral standing, ordinary ethical boundaries begin to collapse. Violence is described as “direct action,” criminal damage as “solidarity,” arrest as “repression,” and prison as martyrdom. The worker in the factory, the police officer with a family, the public frightened by political violence, even the activist discarding their own future, all fade into a heroic narrative about resistance. It is radicalisation. Outrage narrows the mind; group approval encourages escalation; online applause replaces conscience. The slogan provides moral permission, and the crowd offers emotional insulation. Every consequence is then reinterpreted as proof that the system is evil, making self-correction nearly impossible. The most tragic aspect is how cheaply lives are destroyed. People with futures sacrifice them for a fantasy of moral purity. Supporters enjoy the warm glow of righteousness. The accused face the sentence, the criminal record, the terrorist notification requirements, and the ruin of adulthood. You can care about Palestinians without excusing political violence. You can condemn civilian suffering without romanticising criminality or being duped by false propaganda narratives about “genocide”. Having a just cause does not make a person just. Sometimes the most dangerous lie people tell themselves is that because they have chosen the “right side”, anything they do in its name must be good. You can read my report on the Psychology of Disinformation, here: henryjacksonsociety.org/publ…

Der Apartheidsvorwurf gegen Israel ist historisch falsch und politisch brandgefährlich. Dass ausgerechnet die EU-Außenbeauftragte dieses Zerrbild übernimmt, ist ein schweres Versagen. Europa braucht Klarheit, nicht die Verbreitung antisemitischer Narrative.

Sie sagen jetzt ernsthaft es sei nicht rechtens, das jemand im Knast landet der einem anderen Menschen die Wirbelsäule mit einem Vorschlaghammer zertrümmert weil Palästina. Ob ihr alle völlig den Verstand verloren habt, habe ich gefragt!

In the UK, the canary is already hanging dead from its perch

"Israelkritik"

Krass was Israel mit.. achso, ne, ist nur die Hamas.

Typ mit Palästina-Flagge ist erstaunlich ehrlich: "Mir sind die Taten der Hamas und das Wohl der Zivilbevölkerung in Gaza, über die wir seit drei Jahren herumheulen, eigentlich scheißegal, hauptsache wir können gegen Juden hetzen."

Übrigens re-etabliert die Hamas gerade ihre Machtstruktur über den Gazastreifen, indem es Krankenhäuser und Schulen in Folterzentren umbaut, es gibt auch Berichte von Vergewaltigungen, um dort die Bevölkerung einzuschüchtern. Es gibt Berichte über eine erschreckend hohe Anzahl an Zwangsverheiratungen junger Mädchen in Gaza an Hamas-Kämpfer. Es gibt Berichte über Vergewaltigungen und Verschleppung in Sexsklaverei. Die Al Quassem-Brigaden haben ihre Einsatzfähigkeit wieder hergestellt. Israel hat weder das politische Kapital derzeit, noch rührt die UN irgendeinen Finger, solange man nicht irgendwo dem Juden die Schuld geben kann. Wer am meisten unter dieser ganzen "free palestine"-Manie und Explosion des Antisemitismus leidet, ist die Zivilbevölkerung in Gaza. Die Berichterstattung im Westen sucht aber lieber schnell neue Ziele, jetzt ist es wieder die "West Bank", jetzt hat man den Siedlerextremismus wieder für sich entdeckt, und in Gaza wird der Status Quo für den nächsten Genozidversuch an Juden vorbereitet, und nichts ändert sich. Wir werden das wahrscheinlich aus Europa auch wieder üppig mitfinanzieren, ohne Reformen in den UN-Organen wie UNRWA und Co. Nichts wird sich ändern. Es ging nie um Gaza. Es ging immer nur gegen Juden.

the holocaust is the singular act of thinking the idea of especially antisemitism through (i.e. all the takes antizionists hide behind "Zionist" instead of saying what they actually mean: jews) and putting it into gruesome efficient action. Its more than "we just murder some people", its even more than "we deliberately kill a lot of humans in a war to make a statement". the holocaust was the industrial-scale planned and executed extermination of especially jewish people. Its documented why, its antisemitic in nature without the shadow of any doubt. Genocide is defined that this exact goal of the extermination of an entire people has to be stated (dolus specialis) and also be enacted upon. WORDS HAVE MEANINGS. You cant just call everything genocide. And those "scholars" who claim its a genocide and compare it to the Holocaust are absolutely ridiculous scam artists. yeah, it sounds so convincing when these people blabber about "look even this jewish dude here agrees with me", but its not making false statements suddenly right. No amount of claims of knowdlege on the holocaust makes the pathetic attempt of explaination why gaza is even worse(!) remotely viable. Its simply a pretty basic authority fallacy. There is a reason why genocide is its own category. there is a reason why there is a definition to it. there is a reason why it really does not apply here. the targeted goal of the nazis was the total erasure of the entirety of jewish people (and other groups they deemed not worthy to live, but jews were always on the bottom of every list of 'lebensunwert' people), full stop. no ifs or buts. SIX MILLION people. Not 70.000 of which we dont know how many were hamas combattants. six million people died in the holocaust. if you think thats comparable even by the raw numbers, you are absolutely mental. The actual reason why so many people think they are "allowed" to make this comparison isnt because its remotely comparable. Its not because this is the sole and only historic example to draw parallels to. the holocaust-inversion is a known antisemitic trope. its sole purpose is to inflict damage on jewish people, its purpose is to ensure and to legitimatize the murder of 'Zionists' (jews), because if Nazis and Zionists are the same, arent we morally obliged to kill them to stop 'da genozide'? Its also a way to retroactively say that the nazis were kinda right in killing jews. Even if they say 'we need to attack and fight against zionism', it is what they really mean. Its about the extermination or at least complete submission of the jewish people. Its a vile, transparent play. it really is. People claiming to care about the Holocaust dont really care about it, people claiming to be anti-fascist are full of sh*t if they DO NOT call out the vile nature of the holocaust inversion trope. there is no "bothsides" on this. It is not a valid way to critizise Israels political or military actions. i have no respect for anyone who ran around calling everybody a nazi for 10 years straight the moment you disagreed to any political stance of them and now they run around and shout the same phrases you would expect at a neonazi rally. Comparing the two is not remotely sane. its insane. i am dead serious: if you compare these two, you are either completely mentally deranged or a nazi. no amount of "oh i only hate zionists, i love the jews"-BULLSHIT will change that. period. end of story.

Most people in Europe would never believe this is a republican party ad.

After IDF hit militants at Al-Taba'een School on Aug 10, 2024, Ramy Abdu of Euro-Med Monitor attested that Jaabari family members killed NEVER engaged in military activity. But PIJ recently disclosed Ahmed Jaabari was a commander. Abdu is also the source of the "dog rape" story.

“Netanyahu” today functions as a boogeyman. He is a hated figure on the world stage because he plays the role of the Jewish villain in the antizionist universe, not unlike the role Baron de Rothschild played in the antisemitic universe. He serves as a scapegoat and a figure of blame. References to “Netanyahu” are regularly invoked to justify and avoid discussion of the explosion of antizionist hate that followed October 7. Rather than confronting the ideology itself, attention is displaced onto a single individual, as though the harassment of Jews, the normalization of antizionist hatred, and the global mobilization against Israel can all be explained by one man, which is irrational and nonsensical.

"Why should we hire you? "I hate Je..sorry, Zionism" "Great, when can you start?"

Oops.

at least they stopped hiding behind "antizionism".

Das liegt doch auf der Hand. Das ICC hat jetzt mehrere Skandale hinter sich, ist sündhaft teuer und wird als politische Waffe missbraucht. Damit hat sich das gesamte Konzept eigentlich überholt. Würde nur nie ein Politiker offen so sagen, weil die UN für viele sakrosankt ist.

I believe that at least 70% of mainstream journalists in western media are actually rabid jew haters and convinced antisemites. there are more and more total mask-off moments happening every single day.