IP Β©onsultant | βš–οΈ @Harvard π™²πš˜πš™πš’πš›πš’πšπš‘πšπ—

Joined October 2014
2,885 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
bitcoin:native
3
10
1,652
𝔽𝕋 retweeted
Alex Pereira vs Ciryl Gane feels like the bigger fight. So why [TF] is it co-main event while Ilia Topuria vs Justin Gaethje is the main event?? x.com/ufc/status/20659635988…

Jun 14
Fate will decide. @AlexPereiraUFC vs @Ciryl_Gane #UFCWhiteHouse LIVE Sunday June 14 at 8pmET on @ParamountPlus! [ Title fights presented by @Cryptocom ]
2
1
10
1,769
Are people really asking Anthropic to open-source a nuclear weapon? πŸ˜‚ x.com/i/trending/20657388099…
1
36
Here's another one After getting caught red-handed ThisπŸ‘‡idiot @ashen_one just admitted to: β†’ Bundling @SlabDrop's $SLAB on side wallets β†’ Using @phygitals 𝕏 account for exit liquidity β†’ Then dumping $25K on holders (probably more) If he is admitting to dumping $25K from side wallets, just imagine what the REAL number could be! Together with his "co-founder" and self-confessed scammer @hydra468 they made close to $200K from side wallets dumping on holders Fucking clowns 🀑
Jun 12
hey, just wanted to explain my side here, people are taking this WAYY outta hand I've been in crypto for six years. I've been offered countless gambling, prediction market, memecoin, rug deals, and I've said no to all of them. If I really wanted to make LOW six figures, I could have just taken some random gambling deal in 2024 and everyone would have forgotten about it by now, just like every other person on this app has who has much more followers than me! 99% of people in crypto that have been here longer than 2 years has rugged a token, shilled a rug, deleted tweets about wrong calls, accepted gambling deals, done shady things, etc -- i have never done any of this and am open about this SLAB is one of the like 10 random little things I've released in the past year that ended up having a token. The only difference is that, yes, I launched this one. You can go to my BAGS app profile. Every single tweet from my vibecoded slop turns into a bags token, and then if I support it or not, people still call me an indian rugger Moltbook town is an example of that, where people literally harassed me for hours until I accepted those fees (grateful for them ofc, it was a lot). I ended up staying awake for like 48 hours straight so that I could build more on that little project to appease the people in the token. I missed a wedding for that token. When it inevitably died, just like every other token in crypto, I once again got called a scammer (less indian scammer remarks this time) Then, the other random pokemon thing I made a few weeks ago, they sent me creator fees, I accepted like $4K and then because im not god and didnt pump that token to $500M MC, i got called a scammer again Then there were the waves of charity tokens created for the two charities I run over the past few years. Every time I accept fees from them to use for the charity and don't somehow pump those coins to a 500M MC, I once again get called a scammer Slab is ofc different because there's a token that I launched myself and this post definitely doesn't look good for Hydra, but we bought the treasury supplies of the token publicly from my tracked wallets as the first buys so anyone tracking me could have snuck into this bundle, just like a bunch of people did. One gc knew we were working on it before so they had freshies ready (they helped me set up LPs and launch bc I've never done this before). I didn't even share eca because the second I bought from my wallet, all my copy traders did too (ex: look at this guy from a gc i used to trench in x.com/okarun1120/status/2065…) That's also why it makes sense that some of our wallets might have transactions with each other. We've been trenching with each other for like three years. It's really not that crazy that one TX exists between a few of the top traders, it doesn't make 50 wallets mine or hydras, idek how some of those top traders cooked that hard I didn't even make enough money from my side wallets to be in this thread. I think I made maybe $25K selling from a side wallet at around 1.2 mil into green candles. And this might be controversial for some people, but does it really make sense for me to not have some supply in my own token? Every token ever has supply held by its team members. I worked on this thing for like five days straight. I think it makes sense that I got to make some money, right? As long as I didnt nuke the chart, which I didnt. The other bundles are NOT mine, they're literally just randoms who track my wallet About Phygitals, they knew we were going to launch for a few days and helped us directly to make sure that our tech worked for the launch. Hydra tweeted about us from their account (he runs the account), and then the company decided to delete it for whatever reason. That deleted quote retweet and retweet definitely did not help the chart or credibility. I think the only reason that happened is because people thought our token (solana:6RXiM7kFbVhqNnS12m8gUjNrvzUdL9kRTsYGJWHEFQTc) was their official token and didn't want that confusion to stick around. Either way, a deleted tweet definitely does not look good on anybody and didn't help the chart, but we kept going It's also interesting that in all of these threads, nobody mentions how great this token and its utility was. The only reason I launched this token is because it was necessary to the project. The creator fees funded the project. We opened up like 250 packs, gave away nearly $25,000 in tokens, made custom gym battles and also gave away slabs that were worth nearly $50,000 . We also held $120,000 of SLAB in treasury wallets and didnt touch any of it, if we were going to actually rug, wouldn't we have just rugged all of that? I don't know how anybody could call that a rug. Out of the million of tokens that have launched in the past six months, this is probably one of the coolest tokens with the best tech backing it. Even now it is still fully automated. It's still working. We're still posting relevant stuff. And the second that it has creator fees, it will continue to pull slabs. I can promise you, after six years of crypto, I did not launch a pokemon token so my friend and I could make 200k on a two mil topper
1
392
After getting caught red-handed ThisπŸ‘‡idiot @hydra468 just admitted to: β†’ Bundling @SlabDrop $SLAB on side wallets β†’ Posting on @phygitals 𝕏 account for exit liquidity β†’ Then dumping $55K on holders Fucking clown 🀑
Jun 12
> first off the coin was and is NOT an official phygitals coin, there was miscommunication and i thought it would be okay to post it on their X, but it wasn’t and it got deleted, I did NOT post that to β€œshill” my bags. that post was NOT a reflection of phygitals as a company and brand. > everyone who is throwing hate towards phygitals needs to chill, we built this project ON THEM & their platform, phygitals is an amazing hardworking team. > the day before the coin started tanking, we got nothing but love. gave away 250 slabs, gave out around 20k in allocation, slabs given away were about $40k~ in value > everything is onchain, that initial 1A you’re talking about with the coinbase, yeah that’s mine, i will NEVER hide what i do, or what i make. those other bundles are NOT mine, they’re just people who tracked ashen’s wallets and bought early, we have no control over that or how they sold. we always tried to sell into green candles and volume > i built my platform off selling and buying collectibles worth up to $1M USD. i would not ruin my rep or trust for a coin lol, i dont need to or want to, or would rug a coin, my tcgs fund my life and they always have. > as soon as we bought from our treasuries the chart candled straight to 200-300k due to wallet trackers and people we’ve trenched with before (they def weren’t tracking me who da hell am i). > we’re doxxed and building in public lol > the goal of slabdrop was to give away free slabs (and sealed) by holding the token, thats not going to change, and we’ll continue to do that
2
219
𝔽𝕋 retweeted
As a result of a US government directive, we are suspending access to Claude Fable 5 for all users. You can continue to use all other Claude models. Here’s what this means for you: Across Claude products, new sessions will run on your selected default model or Opus 4.8, and existing Fable 5 sessions will end with an error. On the Claude Platform, requests to Fable 5 will also return an error. Please update your integrations to other Claude models. We know this is a disruption to your workflows; we appreciate your patience and support.
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Claude models is not affected. We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible. Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…
3,595
7,232
44,439
12,559,946
If you click the "Like" button on 𝕏 you'll see this nice rocket animation to celebrate SpaceX's $SPCX IPO debut πŸ₯³ Try it now! β€οΈπŸš€
1
104
SpaceX $SPCX is trading at $174.92 per share 29.57% from IPO price of $135 Elon Musk is the world's first TRILLIONAIRE!
3
122
Losses compound fast in crypto Another example below From $80M β†’ $500K is a 99.4% drawdown I had my journey too From $10K port β†’ $900K β†’ $400 Mine wasn't lifestyle inflation or leverage trading Just a series of bad trades in a creeping bear market You really can lose it all in the blink of an eye
I’ve wanted to tell this story for years. Never had the courage. Here it is. I turned a presale allocation into $80 million on $OHM. Today I have $500k left. In 2021, I got a presale allocation in OlympusDAO, then aped heavily myself on top of it. The allocation got me in the door. My own conviction made me go all in. Staked everything. Watched it compound daily. By the peak I was sitting on $80 million. Then I started spending like the money printed itself. Private jets to Dubai because commercial felt beneath me. $40k weekends in Monaco. A garage full of cars I drove twice. Watches I never wore. I tipped $5k at dinners just to feel something. Every purchase was a flex for an audience that didn’t care. The casino was worse. High limit rooms in Vegas and Macau. I’d lose $2 million in a night and laugh it off because the portfolio would make it back by morning. Until it didn’t. When $OHM unwound, I didn’t sell. I doubled down. Then I leveraged. 5x, then 10x, trying to trade my way back to the peak. Every liquidation felt like a personal insult, so I’d open a bigger position. I wasn’t trading anymore. I was gambling with a different interface. $80 million became $20 million. $20 million became $4 million. I told myself $4 million was still life changing money. Then I levered that too. $500k. That’s what’s left. Here’s what I learned the expensive way: Unrealized gains are not money. I never had $80 million. I had a number on a screen and the arrogance to believe it was permanent. Getting in early is a gift. I treated it like a skill. The allocation didn’t make me a genius. It made me lucky. I confused the two for three years. Lifestyle inflation is a leak you don’t notice until the ship is underwater. The jets and cars didn’t kill me. The identity did. I became someone who needed to spend to feel like a winner. Leverage doesn’t get you back to even. It gets you to zero faster. Revenge trading is just grief with a chart open. Nobody at the table in Monaco remembers my name. I’ve carried this story alone for years. Too embarrassed to say it out loud. But $500k is more than most people will ever hold at once, and I’m done pretending the past didn’t happen. The next decade is about building slow and keeping what I make. If you’re up big right now, screenshot this. You’ll need it.
1
3
325
Another example From $45M to $17K Loss compound incredibly fast in crypto x.com/shaams/status/20645704…

What I learned from roundtripping $45M - My story (0:12) - Always be spending (1:38) - Cash is your friend (2:38) - Sizing with no ego (3:01) - Be open-minded (3:22) - My next moves (3:35)
1
59
The transition from middle weight to heavy weight is what’s most interesting here Rooting for Alex but he has a glass chin Israel Adesanya showed us that Twice!
The difference between Alex Pereira from his middleweight and light heavyweight days to his debut as a heavyweight πŸ‘€πŸ’ͺ The UFC might have its first triple champion πŸ†πŸ†πŸ†
1
94
Anthropic is Misanthropic πŸ“
JUST IN: Biologists are growing frustrated as Anthropic’s β€œsafe” Mythos-class model refuses to answer basic biology questions.
3
94
AI: Thanks for the new data.
Jun 10
No Midjourney here. All of my art is human made. 🫑
1
86
Are people really dumping Bitcoin bitcoin:native to buy SpaceX's IPO at $2T Valuation? What's the upside potential? For reference the top five most valuable public companies in the world rank as follows: β†’ Nvidia (NVDA): ~$4.78T β†’ Alphabet (GOOG): ~$4.03T β†’ Apple (AAPL): ~$3.8T β†’ Microsoft (MSFT): ~$2.92T β†’ Amazon (AMZN): ~$2.67T Is SpaceX currently more valuable than these companies, and if so, by what magnitude? 11/June should be interesting πŸ€”
2
82
Printr is lost With all their cross-chain integrations, only 3 tokens are above $97K MC! and even those are struggling The amount of damage ex-CEO MasterPrinter (Quote-repostπŸ‘‡) did before stepping down is now becoming apparent: β†’ Announced "PRINT" token presale to raise $2M at $50M Valuation less than 2 weeks into "Printr V2" which turned out to be a gimmick β†’ The presale announcement vamped Printr's fragile ecosystem and worse, it looked like an exit scam β†’ Printr had raised $4.5M from ByBit & Co. in Oct/2025, Just ~6 months before announcing the presale β†’ It is possible (if not likely) that the $4.5M they raised from ByBit & Co. was misappropriated β†’ Probably why ByBit & related entities unfollowed Pintr. The partnership with ByReal was killed, and Printr was forced to remove "incubated by ByBit" from their Bio β†’ Printr is effectively no longer supported by ByBit. Although they can still flex the $4.5M raise as evidence of past support (which means nothing really) β†’ The relationship with ByBit was destroyed. But MasterPrintr was not done yet β†’ In a bid to drive volume to the launchpad, he forged alliances with questionable "KOLs" like @Snipeder (Account deleted) and shilled blatant rugs like "FAX" β†’ And when everything started falling apart and those KOLs betrayed him (as expected), he disappeared while Printr tokens sank into a death spiral β†’ He only reappeared after the damage was done; after all Printr tokens were virtually dead and all trust had been lost β†’ But he didn't reappear to try to fix anything; he reappeared to "step down" and install an unprepared person in his place β†’ They've been trying to rebuild trust ever since without success β†’ People say crypto-bros have gold fish memory But crypto-bros also have PTSD β†’ They never forget financial loss and would never go back to the platform that rugged them β†’ That said $OOO, $FATCHOI, & $KET stuck around during the crisis and have been trying to rebuild β†’ But there's contagion. The failure of Printr stalled their recovery and will continue to do so It would take a miracle to bring back Printr from the dead Valar Morghulis πŸ’€
A New Chapter for Printr First, I apologize for the radio silence in the last two days. This has been an incredibly difficult time for me and this is the hardest thing I’ve written. After two years of building Printr, I'm stepping down as CEO. Lennon (@0xlenn), our COO and Head of GTM, will take over as CEO effective immediately. Lea continues as CTO and co-founder. I'll be staying on as an advisor As part of this transition, we're also making a significant decision: we will be returning all funds raised in the community sale. I want to be transparent with our community, team, and investors about why, and what this means for Printr going forward. Why I'm stepping down Building Printr has been the most meaningful work of my life. We set out to make token creation a fair, transparent primitive of the onchain economy, to democratize crypto for everyone, and to align incentives so creators and communities could thrive together. I still believe in that mission. But I've been running close to empty for a while, and the events of the last few days have pushed my health past where I can keep leading from the front. We saw bad actors like Fax take advantage of users on the platform. Fax convinced me they were building a fee share feature on top of Printr which I thought was value additive to the Printr ecosystem. I gave attention to this because I thought it was great to have the community build out useful features for the ecosystem. Afterwards,they quickly launched a token and farmed their users. Many people claimedthat I endorsed it. Trust eroded. Many in the community placed that responsibility on me personally even though I was not involved neither did I endorse it. This caused a cascading effects of tokens in the Printr ecosystem selling off. Watching it unfold has been the most painful part of this journey. Despite having intentions of improving the launchpad space, and doing everything in my power to put community first, I have received many toxic messages, threats, blaming me for the actions of bad actors. People know me to be a kind, empathetic person. I read every message from the community, and the FUD, blame and toxicity has heavily weighed on my mental health. I'm dealing with chronic stress and other health problems, and I'm not in a state to continue as CEO through TGE and beyond. Pretending otherwise would be unfair to the team, our community, and everyone counting on Printr to deliver. The right thing to do is to step back, recover, and put Printr in the hands of leaders who can carry it through this next chapter with the energy it deserves. Why we're returning the community sale We built Printr because we believed in fairness, transparency, and aligned incentives. A leadership transition alone is not enough to reset that trust. Returning the community sale is the clearest signal we can send that we are serious about doing right by the people who backed us early. Every participant in the community sale will receive a full refund. Details on the refund process will follow in a separate post within the next 7 days. Printr will continue, the mission continues, but it continues without obligations to community sale participants who deserve the option to exit cleanly. Why Lennon is the right person to lead Lennon has been the engine behind Printr's go to market from the beginning. As COO and Head of GTM, he has driven our partnerships, our community growth, our launch execution, and our ecosystem positioning across every chain we operate on. He knows the market, he knows our users, and he knows what it takes to win in this space. Printr's next chapter is about distribution, adoption, and rebuilding trust. Lennon is the right leader for that chapter. He'll be working alongside Lea, who continues as CTO and co-founder. Together they have my full confidence. My role going forward I'll be staying on as an advisor to Printr. I'm not walking away from the mission or the team, I'm stepping out of the day to day so I can recover, and so Lennon and Lea can lead with a clear mandate. They'll have my full support, my context, and my network whenever it's useful to them. What stays the same The product continues. The team is intact. The roadmap is intact. The platform operates as normal. Lennon will share more about near term priorities in a follow up post. To our community and supporters Thank you for believing in what we're building. The vision is bigger than any one person, and Printr has always been a team effort. To those who participated in the community sale, you'll be made whole. To those who continue to use and build on Printr, you'll be in great hands. Fed
1
338
Guy made wife-changing-money in less than 24hrs πŸ˜‚ He's now going to terrorize the village girls. You guys have no idea 🀣
1
110
𝔽𝕋 retweeted
Replying to @discordiaCLIPS
It’s sad that all the rich people left crypto and it’s now the entire industry is just teenagers in America forcing poor people to do shameful things.
552
252
3,878
261,870
This nonsense is being promoted by a multi-billion dollar company BTW. That’s PumpFun for you πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
New: An Indian man @Arivulife got β€œ$Boutywork” tattooed on his forehead to win a 40 $SOL bounty on Pump.fun, only for the claim to be denied because the tattoo misspelled the intended ticker, β€œ$Bountywork.”
1
7
323
All innovation, creativity, and solutions-driven development virtually stopped on Solana once PumpFun entered the picture Nothing else could catch a bid on Solana if it wasn't memecoin tooling or memecoin launchpads so Devs pivoted to deving extractive platforms like Axiom, Padre (Terminal), etc Solana founders eagerly welcomed PumpFun's activity and used misleading metrics driven by bot activity to flex mass adoption to institutional investors while everything else died They were happy to ignore the long-term destructive effect of PumpFun because it gave them those metrics So they gave a multi-billion dollar warchest to an hyper extractive platform with a destructive business model that harmed users and harmed the chain This has now made the entire chain unattractive to institutions and serious developers Regulated institutions shy away from investment in casinos, which is what Solana has become; one big unregulated casino run by a morally corrupt "House" Now they're seeing it. Now they're desperate to be known for something beyond memecoin trading. That's the main driver behind PhoenixTrade and why Toly was relentlessly bagworking a basic perps protocol Solana wants to be known for something beyond PumpFun and memecoin gambling But it may be too little too late.
Dear Solana: Solana is my favorite blockchain to transact on. It is still one of my favorite assets to trade. And when price is attractive, I still think there is a good case for accumulating it. But I am less bullish on SOL’s next-cycle price targets than I was last time. Last cycle, while everyone was calling for $500 SOL, I publicly said I planned to be out before $250. Solana’s ATH came earlier than BTC and much of the market, but that call ended up being pretty damn close. This time, unless I see a real fundamental shift, I will probably be lowering my targets. As things stand now, I would likely be out before $200 next cycle. That is not because I hate Solana. I don’t. But love is not a sound investment thesis. The reasons are pretty straightforward. Pump fun has historically made up a meaningful chunk of Solana volume, and I believe the pump (and broader memecoin casino) meta is dying. Maybe it evolves. Maybe something replaces it. But pretending that was not a significant driver of activity feels dishonest. Solana DeFi has also taken a serious hit. A lot of Solana DeFi was tied into Drift, and the damage there impacted dozens of protocols. It hurt the broader perception of Solana DeFi. Then there is the capital markets side. A lot of Solana DATs were formed at some of the worst possible price points, then unwound, restructured, or de-risked at some of the worst possible price points. CT forgets everything in 72 hours but institutional capital does not. If a bunch of institutions got dragged into Solana exposure near the highs, then unwound for losses, that leaves a mark. It does not mean they will never touch SOL again. But it does mean the next wave of institutional appetite may not be as easy, clean, or deep as people assume. Then there is the cultural layer. Solana feels disjointed right now. Some of the most prominent Solana voices have spent an incredible amount of time relentlessly shilling an entirely different blockchain. Yes, ZEC is it's own Layer 1. It does not exactly scream focus on Solana itself. It reads as devs thinking their bag is cooked and so they start pumping their next bag. Only now does there finally seem to be real traction around addressing the inflation issue, which should have been more meaningfully a long time ago. But what really read as desperation to me was the @PhoenixTrade push. That moment actually influenced my vision more than any of the others. Look, I have traded over $5B in perps across various protocols. I have tested or used almost every β€œperp DEX” worth testing. And Phoenix is about as basic as it gets. Yes, the engineering under the hood is interesting. Fine. Mad respect to the builders. But traders do not ultimately care about engineering. They care about three things: Does it work? Can I make money there? Is it safe? And right now, the best Solana-adjacent perps venue is @pacifica_fi . I say Solana-adjacent because it is mostly the stables on-ramp and Solana TVL. It is not generating massive activity for the Solana network itself. And even Pacifica has already talked about building its own L1. (A decision I'm skeptical about, even as a fan) My exact reaction to the huge marketing push on one of the most basic perp dexs I've ever traded on was: they are so very desperate for something to gain traction on Solana it actually scares me. Solana talks a lot about what it wants to be when it grows up. And to be clear, the vision is compelling. The ambition is real. The talent is definitely real. But ambition is not maturity. Every kid wants to be a doctor, an astronaut, or a superhero when they grow up. I care more about what something actually is than what it says it wants to become. So what is my favorite new blockchain? Solana. Because you can still love something and still be rational about it. 🫑 From the depths β€” The White Whale πŸ‹
2
102
bitcoin:native: Please we're tired of winning Mr. President 😭
2
118
$THREE dumped -70% in 24hrs because IBM acknowledged a partnership with another shitcoin β€” $GOBLINTOWN [$370K MC] It seems people realized that either IBM "partnerships" mean nothing or the IBM intern is just retarded THREE is just another memecoin riding on a "Tech" narrative
8
11
4,301