Joined March 2014
350 Photos and videos
James Holden, an administrative judge with the USDA in the Office of Hearing and Appeals, believes the union that represents him was put in place unlawfully. Judge Holden alleges that the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) broke federal statute when it certified AFSCME, Council 20 to represent his “mixed” bargaining unit that combines professional and nonprofessional employees. The Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute is clear: a union cannot represent a bargaining unit of both professional and nonprofessional employees unless a majority of just the professional employees first vote to be included in that unit with nonprofessional employees.
1
20
In 1998, an election was held and a union was certified by the FLRA to represent this “mixed” bargaining unit. But when Judge Holden asked to see the election documents, the FLRA could not provide them. Judge Holden alleges that the FLRA either destroyed or failed to preserve key documents. Without election records, there is no evidence that a majority of professional employees voted to join the mixed unit as required by federal statute. Therefore, Judge Holden believes that the union was unlawfully certified as the representative of the professional employees and has been illegally representing professional employees for decades. Read more here: buff.ly/Pf60DnQ
1
16
Judge Holden turned to the Fairness Center to file a federal lawsuit to uphold his right to free association and to initiate an enforcement action with the Attorney General to recover missing employee election records. “This case is about an unlawful employee election and unwanted union representation. Judge Holden wants the court to acknowledge that the union and the Federal Labor Relations Authority are violating his rights by forcing him to associate with a union that was unlawfully certified to represent him," Fairness Center president and general counsel Nathan McGrath said. Read more here: buff.ly/Pf60DnQ
9
For decades, ghost teachers haunted the halls of Pennsylvania’s largest school districts with impunity. These public-school educators abandoned their classrooms for full-time teachers’ union advocacy, serving as union officials while still getting paid as teachers and illegally draining the public pension system. Beginning in 2015, the Fairness Center’s clients began challenging the practice in the court of law and the court of public opinion and sparked a wave of reform.
1
16
Concerned about how ghost teachers could harm public schools by redirecting money and personnel away from the classroom, our clients were determined to expose and reform the practice. Our clients’ courtroom and public relations success made waves across the state. Newspaper editorial boards condemned ghost teaching. Pennsylvania lawmakers introduced two bills to reform ghost teacher practices. And two more large, urban school districts, Erie and Lancaster, voluntarily changed their teacher contracts to reform ghost teacher provisions. Ultimately, our clients achieved their goals to expose ghost teachers, reform the practice, and place retirement costs where they belong—with the union, not taxpayers. Read more: buff.ly/yGtnRiu
11
"How a Special Education Teacher Faced Union Retaliation in NJ," @nj1015 reports. Angela Arancio "alleges her union retaliated against her after she raised concerns about workload and prep time in her contract," the report says. "According to Arancio, the union took no action after she voiced concerns about the agreement between the union and the district."
1
1
35
"Arancio later filed an Unfair Labor Practice Charge and began discussing her concerns with colleagues and friends, including support via text message circulated among members of a union committee known as the Crisis Action Team," the report continues. "Arancio alleges that in June 2025, the union retaliated by dissolving the Crisis Action Team, where she had been serving." She "argues that dissolving the Crisis Action Team was punishment for her filing the unfair labor charge and gaining support from other teachers." Read more: buff.ly/isiWRrx
1
18
“Hopefully, unions become more aware of the fact that their members do have a statutory right to file unfair labor practice charges against them,” Fairness Center managing attorney Anthony Holtzman said. “It is not appropriate to retaliate against or punish somebody who exercises that right.” Read more: buff.ly/isiWRrx
1
15
“I want to be part of the solution to problems in the education system. The union simply continues to be part of the problem," Cumberland Valley School District education assistant Curtis Thompson said. Curtis felt that his union no longer had his best interest at heart, so he asked his employer to stop deducting union dues from his paycheck. When his union refused to honor his request to resign, Curtis took to the internet and found the Fairness Center.
1
28
On Curtis’s behalf, we filed a lawsuit against AFSCME, District Council 89 and the Cumberland Valley School District to protect his First Amendment rights. Curtis’s case was settled to the mutual satisfaction of all parties, and he is no longer a member of AFSCME, District Council 89. Read more here: buff.ly/zRHYT2I
23
In 2022, Tina Curtis’ union, UNITE HERE, still required school employees to pay the union to keep their jobs—four years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Janus v. AFSCME decision made that practice illegal. UNITE HERE was aware of the Janus ruling, having released a statement as it was announced in 2018. But union officials willfully ignored it and continued to tell Tina and her colleagues that they were required to make union payments. Tina contacted UNITE HERE officials to resign her union membership, but union officials refused to accept her resignation. Tina’s attempts to resign were ignored or thwarted at every turn. Then she found the Fairness Center.
1
64
We filed a lawsuit against UNITE HERE to defend Tina’s First and Fourteenth Amendment rights in February of 2022. Tina’s lawsuit demanded that UNITE HERE: 1) Accept her union membership resignation 2) Refund the dues she paid since she first attempted to resign in 2019 3) Remove the language requiring union membership or payments from union membership cards and the collective bargaining agreement. Just months later, UNITE HERE caved and agreed to all three of Tina’s terms—a victory that also protected her colleagues’ constitutional rights. Read more here: buff.ly/osiGtTs
27
Pennsylvania corrections officers Chris Taylor and Cory Yedlosky suspected that union officials at Pennsylvania State Corrections Officers Association mishandled union funds. Their own audit of the union’s finances confirmed their suspicions: local officials had mishandled thousands of dollars of union members’ dues. Concerned, Cory, Chris, and a colleague brought their findings to Jason Bloom, then-president of the statewide PSCOA union, but he “blew off” the audit and “put [it] in a drawer to collect dust.” Cory and Chris resigned from the PSCOA in disgust, but they refused to give up on their goal of holding their union accountable. Their persistence would eventually reveal that union officials had spent members’ money on NFL tickets, a $12,000 Rolex watch, and outings at PGA Tour-level golf courses.
1
34
The Fairness Center filed a lawsuit on the officers’ behalf to force union officials to address the officers’ concerns. A month later, state police arrested local union treasurer Bryan Peroni on felony theft and forgery charges for writing checks to himself amounting to nearly $30,000. Peroni pleaded guilty to theft and was sentenced. After our client’s lawsuit, PSCOA officials tightened oversight of their finances, revealing even bigger problems and even more mishandled funds. Eventually, state police charged former PSCOA President Jason Bloom with six felony counts of theft for using the union’s credit card for personal expenses. Bloom and Peroni weren't the only ones; in total, six PSCOA officials have been held accountable for theft. Read more: buff.ly/7a8bsXj
1
24
Chris’s and Cory’s litigation made enormous progress towards their goal of bringing transparency and accountability to the PSCOA. Since our clients’ lawsuit, the union instituted trainings for local treasurers, reduced union membership dues, and tightened credit card oversight. Read more: buff.ly/7a8bsXj
19
Philadelphia Fire Department Captain Joe Farrell paid dues to the International Association of Firefighters, Local 22, for nearly 40 years, trusting the union to look out for his best interests. Then he discovered that, for years, union officials had been steering him and his colleagues away from a benefit that could have boosted their pensions, according to lawsuit. Philadelphia firefighters had been able to increase their retirement benefits by selling back unused vacation days before they retired. But Farrell says union officials advised him not to sell back his time. By the time he learned the truth, it was too late.
1
1
54
Farrell believes union officials pushed this bad advice to at least 100 city firefighters, while quietly preserving the vacation sellback opportunity for themselves and their friends, according to court filings. One union official allegedly told Farrell that “if too many fire department employees sold back their vacation time, the city would eliminate the benefit.” Farrell is suing the union for violating its duty of fair representation under state law. Read more here: buff.ly/fAf9LdI
1
49
Mark Kiddo and his Erie Water Works colleagues felt betrayed after learning AFSCME officials deliberately misled them. Union officials had just presented Mark and his colleagues, who were union members, with a four-year contract that the employees weren’t happy with. It included lower salary increases than they expected and kept in place a defined-benefit pension plan favored by union officials. Union officials deceptively told them it was the only offer on the table. Reluctantly, and believing they had no choice, the employees ratified the contract.
1
48
Days later, they learned of a second offer, with higher salary increases, a 401k-style retirement plan for new employees, and an additional retirement benefit—an offer like what they had hoped for all along. The truth, it turned out, was that AFSCME officials had intentionally hidden the better offer from their own members because the officials opposed moving away from defined-benefit retirement plans. AFSCME officials had trampled their members' rights in favor of their own priorities. Then Mark and his colleagues found the Fairness Center. Read more: buff.ly/NTjvPNn
1
1
1
51
After more than two years of litigation, an Erie County judge ruled that “[t]he undisputed material facts of this case demonstrate that AFSCME breached its duty of fair representation” and said that the employees deserved monetary damages from the union. Our clients ultimately settled their case to the mutual satisfaction of all parties. Read more: buff.ly/NTjvPNn
1
2
23