Now that a "peace deal" has been announced, Netanyahu reportedly told Trump that Jews won't withdraw from Lebanon.
In this regard, an Iranian analyst on TV said the solution is as follows:
Given that the very first point of the ceasefire—and therefore its core—is peace on all fronts, especially in Lebanon, and given that the IDF openly said they attacked Dahiyah with the green light from CENTCOM and therefore the Americans are part of it, without a ceasefire and Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon the agreement is void.
Consequently, the best strategy, Vahid Khazab argued, is to act like our enemies. Iran should sign the "deal" but at the same time attack Israel and the Americans anytime they do not abide by the agreements. That is, be part of the agreement but do not abide by it when the enemy does not. In this manner, Iran should now present a one-week scheduled withdrawal from Lebanon to Israel but instead of waiting, even if on day 1 they did not withdraw from city X (which they should have), Iran should attack Israel to show that the agreement is not up for compromise and must be implemented meter by meter until it is fully done on day 7.
Such a move would cause back-and-forth attacks for a few days but that would be far more reasonable and beneficial than signing an agreement and then losing the overall war. This back-and-forth clash itself will be resolved after some days anyway.
In this strategy, Iran is part of the deal and has the legitimacy to enforce it but at the same time has the freedom to attack at will. It is the same strategy Israel is using against Hezbollah, but this time we use it.
صلح لبنانیده هماین است که اسرائیل به ضاحیهی بیروت حمله میکند اما توافق ایران و امریکا به هم نمیخورد؛ و حتا امریکا به عراق تا یمن حمله میکند اما توافق به هم نمیخورد، تا برسیم به حملههای ناشناس و شناس و نرم و سخت اسرائیل و امریکا به ایران..