Will less juvenile judges = more accountability?
Gov. Landry signed Louisiana Senate Bill 217 (now Act 748) effectively removing 3 of 12 Criminal Court Judges – Fuller, Levine and Goode-Douglas. Receiving less attention is the reduction of Orleans Parish Juvenile Court Judges from 4 to 2 through attrition (term or retirement).
For years, New Orleans has faced serious questions about juvenile supervision, including failures in electronic monitoring that allowed dangerous offenders to slip through the cracks. The Louisiana Supreme Court has even ordered investigations involving juvenile court judges following high-profile ankle-monitor cases. The escalation is real and accountability matters.
More judges does not automatically mean better outcomes. When responsibility is spread across multiple courtrooms, it can become harder for the public to identify who is accountable for failures.
A smaller bench can mean clearer lines of responsibility, more consistent policies, and greater public scrutiny of decisions. The goal should not be protecting judicial positions. It should be protecting public safety and restoring confidence in a juvenile justice system that has struggled with monitoring, transparency, and repeat violent offenders.
If fewer judges can deliver better oversight, faster reforms, and clearer accountability, then rightsizing the court is a step worth taking.
💫 For 30 years, the NOPJF has worked to create a safer New Orleans by helping to train, retain, and sustain local law enforcement - including advanced detective training, Cold Case support, Officer Assistance Program coordination, and Digital Forensics hardware.
💪
@JayJaymorris3 @LAGovJeffLandry #nola #neworleans #thinblueline #backtheblue