Instead of taking the creator rewards and cashing them out, which would have created bad optics and looked like a dump, or using them to market buy the token and print a massive green candle, Pigeon chose a different approach.
If Pigeon had market bought with size in a thin TOKEN/SOL liquidity pool, the buy would have caused significant slippage and produced a large visible candle. In low-liquidity meme markets, that kind of candle often becomes exit liquidity for early holders, insiders, bots, and opportunistic traders. A sudden spike in price can give sellers the exact window they need to distribute into strength.
Rather than creating that event, Pigeon provided liquidity to the TOKEN/SOL pool.
When sellers dumped tokens into the pool, they drained the SOL side and pushed price down along the AMM curve. The slippage occurred on their side. As selling continued, the pool became SOL-light and token-heavy.
Because Pigeon owned a large share of the LP tokens, Pigeon effectively owned a proportional share of whatever assets were inside the pool. After sellers had rebalanced the pool toward tokens, Pigeon redeemed the LP position. That redemption returned mostly tokens and less SOL.
Pigeon did not execute a massive market buy. No artificial pump candle was printed. No obvious distribution event was created.
Instead, Pigeon absorbed supply through AMM mechanics by allowing sellers to move the pool and then withdrawing liquidity once the reserves had shifted.
There was no removal of slippage from the system. Slippage still occurred. It was simply experienced by the sellers rather than created by a large public buy.
Checkmate.
We won.
941.
PIGEON IN CONTROL