I wish I lacked critical thinking skills. Y’all seem so happy.

Friendly reminder: Nothing in the Bible commands you to support a country founded in 1948 by the Rothschilds.

Thank god Trump negotiated a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz after it was already open before he started the fucking war that closed it.

How many does that make now?

BREAKING: Iran says the US has agreed to pay $300 billion in reconstruction funds directly to Iran as part of the deal Pakistan announced, alongside the release of $24 billion in frozen funds with $12 billion released before negotiations even start, per Mehr News. This directly contradicts Trump's & Vance's claim that no funds will be transferred to Iran at all. If Trump denies this is true, there never was a deal. If Trump confirms, the US has fully capitulated to Iran's demands.

Trump's family made 600 million Trump coin and holders lost 700 million. It was released in a major marketing campaign from Trump himself to over 100 million followers on X and Truth. The coin has dropped over 95% since. This is the standing definition of an actual rug pull.

Like I said yesterday, the easiest prediction ever. OF COURSE Netanyahu won't abide by Trump's peace deals. The only way this ends is it Trump cuts off Israel entirely. No more funding for Israel, no more military assets, intelligence, etc. Cut them off and let them fight their own damn wars. Bring our troops home and focus on America.

NEVER Use Sunscreen Again! It’s Flooding Your Bloodstream With Toxins At 14X The FDA Limit In Just ONE Day — And It Causes Cancer! Sunscreen does NOT protect you from cancer. It loads your liver and kidneys with poisons, disrupts hormones, and puts your entire body at risk of illness and disease. Here are the 4 highlighted toxic chemicals found in most conventional sunscreens: 🔴 OXYBENZONE Absorbed into blood at levels 16X above the FDA safety threshold. Powerful endocrine disruptor linked to lower testosterone in men and increased breast cancer endometriosis in women. Animal studies proved it causes cancer and tumors. Harms thyroid, testosterone, and kidney function. 🔴 OCTOCRYLENE Reaches blood levels 14X over the FDA cutoff. Often contaminated with benzophenone (a known carcinogen). Wipes out coral reefs and marine life through runoff. 🔴 AVOBENZONE Bloodstream levels 9X above the legal limit. Unstable — breaks down in sunlight into allergens. Disrupts the endocrine system and blocks testosterone. 🔴 ESCAMSULE (also called Mexoryl) Potent endocrine disruptor. Causes elevated liver enzymes, anemia, and skin eruptions. ✅ SAFE, HEALTHY ALTERNATIVE When real sun protection is truly needed (long outdoor activities, beach days, or for young children): Use a pure mineral barrier cream made with non-nano zinc oxide in a grass-fed beef tallow carrier. Beef tallow is a natural, nutrient-rich, non-toxic base that deeply nourishes and protects the skin while zinc oxide creates a physical barrier against UV rays — without any of the chemical absorbers that soak into your bloodstream. This option is ideal for babies, toddlers, and sensitive skin. It lets your body still receive the healing benefits of sunlight (vitamin D, circadian rhythm support, etc.) instead of completely blocking it. Key reminder: It is never healthy to block all sunlight from your body or eyes. The sun provides essential benefits to every cell. Use the zinc tallow barrier only when extended exposure or burning risk is unavoidable — then gradually build your natural “solar callus” with shorter, unprotected sessions.

If you're unvaccinated, you resisted a massive propaganda machine fueled by over $100 billion. At a time when compliance was the norm, you stood your ground. You questioned things. You thought for yourself. And you refused to be swayed by relentless pressure. That kind of conviction is rare, nearly extinct. Be proud of yourself.

This is the way

FACTS!!

Hate to break it to you, but there is no "agreement" being signed tomorrow (Sunday) that exists as described by Trump. For it to be an agreement, by definition, BOTH sides have to agree to the same statements in the document. Yet the Iranians have never wavered from their original demands (Israel must stop attacking Lebanon, war reparations must be paid to Iran, the Strait must remain under Iranian control, Iran will never give up its domestic nuclear power program, etc.) while Trump is saying many things that are completely the opposite such as claiming no money will change hands (no reparations) and that Iran will give up all its enriched nuclear fuel. For starters, Iran will agree to no negotiated terms unless the U.S. military leaves the region and halts its war of aggression against Iran. As usual Trump is living in a delusional fantasy land and whatever he thinks he may be signing is far, far from Iran's non-negotiable demands for a resolution. This looks, yet again, like theater to manipulate markets for Monday morning, to try to create the impression of good news for the global economy where none exists. This is the same Trump who bizarrely stated last week that the Strait of Hormuz has been open for months, with hundreds of tanker ships sailing right through, claiming that we just didn't notice it this whole time. (Actual maritime records completely contradict his strange delusions, of course.) I have no doubt Trump will sign something and claim it's a "deal" and claim the Strait is open, and claim Iran has agreed to give up its nuclear materials, etc., but none of those things will have any basis in reality. Fox News will report Trump's "victory" and try to fake it for as long as possible, until a false flag event can be conjured up and blamed on Iran to claim Iran "violated" the new agreement so that the war can resume yet again. Mark my words. This is the easiest prediction ever. And no, the Strait of Hormuz will not see any resumption of normal tanker traffic anytime soon. Not tomorrow, not next week and not even this entire month. If you believe anything Trump says about Iran tomorrow, you are allowing yourself to be fooled for the 38th time, so make sure you're ready for the 39th prognostication, and the 40th declaration to soon follow. This repeating cycle will continue until the economic threshold of pain is finally reached for western business and government leaders in the months ahead. From there, it's anyone's guess whether Trump will finally put America's interests first or just betray the entire country and side with Netanyahu's interests yet again. Stay tuned...

The most dangerous person to a broken system is someone who no longer needs it. Become that person.

Undecided on vaccines? Here’s some important questions to ask your pediatrician or physician. Ask them to answer without appealing to authority, consensus, or mathematical models: 1. Could you point me to the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial(s) (using an inert placebo) that established the long-term safety profile of any of the vaccines on the CDC’s childhood schedule? 2. In what way was the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule empirically demonstrated to be safe when multiple vaccines are administered at once? For example, more than two-dozen doses by 12 months of age, per the CDC schedule? Were any double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (using an inert placebo) conducted to assess the combined or cumulative effects of receiving multiple vaccines simultaneously? 3. Are there any studies comparing the long-term health outcomes of completely unvaccinated children to those who are fully vaccinated according to the CDC schedule? If not, why? And without that data, on what empirical basis can anyone confidently claim that vaccines are “safe and effective,” when these types of studies are the ones that would actually demonstrate both safety and efficacy? 4. I’ve often heard experts claim that inert-placebo trials for licensed vaccines and a totally unvaccinated vs. fully vaccinated study are “unethical.” But doesn’t that reasoning itself presuppose the very safety that such trials are meant to test? Are you suggesting it’s unethical to test a product’s safety unless we already assume it’s safe? Without that data, on what empirical basis can anyone confidently claim that vaccines are “safe and effective,” when these types of studies are the ones that would actually demonstrate both safety and efficacy? 5. When “placebos” are used in vaccine trials, what do they actually contain? If they’re another vaccine or an aluminum-containing solution, how can that design detect potential harm from the adjuvants or other vaccine ingredients? 6. What research has measured the total impact of giving infants multiple aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines, taking into account the total amount injected, the baby’s small body size, and their still-developing kidneys? And if that data doesn’t exist, how do health authorities determine that giving all of these shots together is safe? 7. From my understanding, the primary studies used to justify the safety of aluminum adjuvants when injected are the Flarend et al. (1997) biodistribution study involving four adult rabbits, and the Mitkus et al. (2011) modeling paper based on ingested aluminum in adults, not injected aluminum in infants. Could you clarify how those studies empirically demonstrate safety in the context of routine pediatric injections? Were there any double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled human trials using inert placebos to confirm those findings, or is the assumption of safety based solely on these limited animal and modeling studies? 8. Most vaccine “effectiveness” claims are based on antibody titers rather than real-world reduction in disease or all-cause mortality. Can you point to empirical evidence showing that antibody levels reliably correlate with actual protection and improved long-term health outcomes? If not, how can “effectiveness” be scientifically validated beyond a surrogate marker? 9. I’ve read that roughly 75% of the FDA’s drug-regulation budget comes from pharmaceutical companies through the Prescription Drug User Fee Act. How can we be confident that vaccine approvals and safety reviews are completely objective when the agency’s funding depends so heavily on the companies? Are there genuine safeguards in place to prevent conflicts of interest or bias in the approval and monitoring process? …continued

Yes

You are being robbed blind by an international cabal of central bankers, corporate oligarchs and their puppets who occupy positions in both the government and the private sector.

I don't know who needs to hear this, but idolizing a politician is like thinking the stripper actually likes you.

The bread is stale and the circus is boring