CHRISTIANS/ FELLOW PROTESTANTS! I present to you. A clout chaser. Making a big bad post about debating someone with a much bigger audience and because it doesn’t benefit someone with an actual audience. He gets told no so he gets butt hurt and cries. 😱😭😭. Omg Jay won’t debate him! Yeah dude. No one who is anyone on your side of things would watch it. Call in to jays show. Stop chasing clout.

This is how a good conversation between abortion abolition and pro choice should go! Extremely respectful after a bumpy start.

Go check out this thread where this guy couldn’t even define his own terms but required me to be precise. He hid behind ambiguous language while expecting me to grant his presuppositions.

they will do this. make no mistake, they will change the rules to ensure they retain power and strip the individual of their rights.

Hey guys. If you’re following Shannon. Note in this thread she can not follow an argument and moves in ambiguity in order to try and be “right”. Look through the thread for yourself. If you find what I’m saying is true. Feel free to follow me for more coherent arguments. Instead of a shallow woman who switched to adhom when she is losing.

She called me “too far gone” on a thread where she switched the child from a trespasser to a bullet mid-argument, abandoned her own bodily autonomy principle the second it applied to men, and never once actually rebutted implied license to enter. I followed the thread just fine. She just didn’t like where it went.

Amanda spent hours telling me my logic fails. Here's what their logic actually did: — Called a fetus a tapeworm and a parasite, then claimed it wasn't a legal argument when I responded to it — Said 'six of one, half dozen' between 'fetus has no rights' and 'mother's autonomy overrides fetus' — these aren't the same. If the fetus has no rights, you don't need a bodily autonomy argument at all — Used dependency to deny rights, which by their own standard strips rights from newborns, the elderly, and the severely disabled — never addressed this once — Said stopping nursing and stopping a pregnancy are equivalent choices — one child lives, one dies. Not equivalent — Dismissed the conjoined twin example without engaging the medical reality that one twin CAN be entirely dependent on the other's organs — Called a developing human with a heartbeat, forming organs, and its own blood type a 'clump of cells' — Never once defined what qualities actually determine personhood after being asked directly — Closed with 'don't have sex if you don't want abortion' — the exact same responsibility argument they spent hours attacking me for making The one question I asked from the beginning: what qualities determine personhood? Everything else — bodily autonomy, viability, dependency, rights — only makes sense once you answer that. They never did.

Even if this is AI. It’s hilarious

Texas HD 132 candidate @SaraForTexLege just muted me and accused me of being AI because she couldn’t answer one question: Does the fetus count as a person? She refused to answer it, called it “getting into the weeds,” accused me of moving goalposts, called me a misogynist, claimed she answered it several times without ever answering it, and then ran. I’m a real person. If you want proof you can look into my YouTube ect. She’s a real candidate. And she still has no answer.

Texas HD 132 candidate @SaraForTexLege said: “The fetus, by definition, is not autonomous. There is only one person’s bodily autonomy in discussion here because there is only one who legally has it.” This was her answer after: — Refusing to say when life begins — Claiming I moved goalposts when I quoted her own opening sentence back to her — Calling me a misogynist for arguing equal legal standards — Claiming she answered the personhood question “several times” without ever actually answering it She never defended the premise. She just kept asserting the conclusion. That’s not a legal argument. That’s not a constitutional argument. That’s gaslighting dressed up as policy. Anyone in the Harris area tx should definitely vote to make sure this snake doesn’t get in office.

These people are evil. When you get down to what they really believe. It all boils down to “I just want to murder innocent babies.” They just use their virtue signaling and moral outrage as a tool to get what they want.

Look. This virtue signaling pro choice feminist on full display admitting she doesn’t care about humans life at all. I only asked if she would take a minor inconvenience to keep life going. She’s the one who threw pregnancy in there. 😂

I swear Tolbert has dirt on someone in the front office

Did they really just find out that the guy that attacked Mr pelosi was an illegal immigrant that actually voted dem in San Francisco?

I’m getting the sense. That “far right” means far right from them and not the actual far right. They say centrists are right wing. They say moderate right is far right. I’m going to go out on a limb and say moderate leftist are considered right leaning to the far left.

The reactions we've seen in the days following Charlie Kirk's assassination have been horrifying but I also believe it's crucial we don't let anyone memory hole them. I collected dozens of videos so you have an easy reference whenever someone says "that never happened."

I'm crying and I'm not ashamed to admit it. I feel so deeply for these beautiful people.

Hello @grok Do you know who was the most famous person (with the most followers) who visited my profile? They don’t have to be mutual. Don’t tag them, just say who it was