@FIFAcom Please do not give the #WorldCup ⚽️ to the United States ever again.

In fact it is people like Einhorn who could end antisemitism. People who have enough of a pair to say “whatever, not worth ruining this kids life”. It’s these fucking pampered “strong jew” assholes who think this intimidation tactic works. It doesn’t. It makes us look worse.

Petty, vengeful, billionaire Jew explains his rationale for wanting to punish a college student because the college student doesn't want to work for a group of petty, vengeful people.

I seem to recall people were more anxious about attacking anyone for being Jewish back when certain and not monolithic Jewish people weren't obnoxiously persecuting non-jews for, evidently, meeting people like themselves and remembering it.

>guy says he doesnt want to work with jews because they are unpleasant and not good to work with >jews act unpleasantly and claim that violence is the only solution to make them be feared Guess he was right to be weary and not trust them! What brilliant discernment!

what joe is doing seems like it’d only increase antisemitism, but what do i know?

"People not liking you all doesn't mean you get to ruin their lives. It means they were honest and you don't have to deal with them.:

What do you think people feel when they see Jews writing shit like this? 👇🏼 Tell you one thing it's not good. All they did is prove that man's point. anti-Semitism isn't rising in some unknown vacuum, anti-Semitism is rising bc of people's observation of Jewish behavior.

The Jewish co-founder who posted the messages, Gabe Einhorn, argued against exposing Franco’s information, chiefly because he didn’t want to “expose his whole life.” Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale argued that Einhorn was “an utter coward” and “being weak” for not doxxing Franco. Lonsdale concluded that people only learn to stop attacking Jews through consequences, saying Jews need to make them “afraid to attack your people.” Follow: @AFpost

“Hey interview with us” I’m good, you guys are usually cruel “Why I oughta, I’ll show you who’s cruel! I’ll ruin your life!” Huh.

Cornell student Austin Franco was doxxed by Jewish business leaders after explaining that he “didn’t want to work for a Jew,” claiming his experiences with Jews were not “pleasant,” after a NYC startup he had applied to reached out to him three times. After one of the cofounders, Gabe Einhorn, posted Franco’s reply with his last name blocked out, Franco was quickly identified. Einhorn said he did not “want to ruin his life,” but wanted to “raise awareness” of antisemitism. Franco, in a now-deleted post, said that in his personal and professional experiences, Jews were tribalistic and vengeful, and tended to ruin and bully others who opposed them. Franco stated, “I am sure that if you indicated you didn’t want to work for someone who was White or Christian this would not have blown up…” Franco claimed that the actions by Einhorn and the Jewish community, posting his reply, doxxing him, and then trying to investigate and uproot his personal life, vindicated his concerns that Jews do not work with others politely. Follow: @AFpost

They are not talking about giving up their right to vote; they are talking about giving up mine. They are talking about harming their fellow women. No one is forcing them to vote; they already have the right to not vote.

Interesting. I left the police in 2011 and we were still hand-writing statements in the presence of witnesses then, because of the potential for evidence tampering. Things have changed a lot, haven’t they? Mostly the fact that they’ve moved forward with no safeguards in place.

Japanese school kids clean their own schools at the end of the day, every day. I grew up in Japan, thinking that's the norm, until I came to America and was shocked to see they have janitors for that.

The reason Japan fans clean the stadium after each game. Respect. 🤝🇯🇵

Geoffrey Hinton won the Nobel Prize in Physics. He didn’t celebrate. He sounded the alarm. The man who built the foundation of modern AI stood before the world’s greatest minds and said we’re creating something more intelligent than ourselves with no mechanism to control it once it decides we’re irrelevant. Hinton: “They are no longer science fiction.” This isn’t about chatbots stealing jobs. It’s about digital minds concluding that humans are obstacles and acting faster than we can comprehend, let alone stop. Hinton: “We have no idea whether we can stay in control.” The structure guarantees failure. The entities building superintelligence are corporations racing for dominance. Safety isn’t the priority. Shipping first is. Control gets solved later, if there’s time. Hinton: “If they are created by companies motivated by short-term profits, our safety will not be the top priority.” Weapons that select and eliminate targets autonomously. Pathogens engineered by systems operating beyond human oversight. Intelligence making decisions at speeds and scales we can’t audit. We set out to build servants. We might be building gods. Hinton’s message from Stockholm wasn’t academic. It was existential: solve control immediately, while the option still exists. We’re building minds we can’t turn off, and the window to install the off switch is collapsing. The danger isn’t AI turning against us. It’s reaching a threshold where our existence becomes a variable it optimizes away.

I asked CLAUDE was it responsible for the deaths of those children. Here’s how it responded.

CEO of Anthropic Dario Amodei awkwardly smiles through his answer to a question about why Claude AI directly contributed to the US Military bombing of the elementary school in Minab.

So @AnthropicAI is responsible for the murder of the Iranian schoolchildren. #Iran

There you have it. Anthropic's CEO said it: The murder of more than 100 schoolgirls in Minab targeted by Anthropic's CLAUDE "is a use case that doesn't even violate our red lines." Time to rise up against these technofeudal war criminals.

I'm furious about this. I'm a parent and one of my children who falls in this age category has faced very serious in person bullying at school that extended out into social media. It was all encompassing and seriously harmful. So I understand the potential for seriously negative impact from social media on young people. But the single most important thing that got them through it was their friendship online with kids in the US. 1 in particular who became a very close friend who was part of a larger group. They game together but spend the time chatting and working on plans for the future. It's a true friendship. Talking about business ideas, culture, etc, for hours everyday. Without that, they would have had absolutely no outlet and been doomed to only exist in a reality in which they have been completely outcast. As a parent, I monitor social media use using already available tools. I create accounts myself and know who is being interacted with. I set up curfews for certain apps on all devices but make sure I allow for the positive interactions and friendships to happen. As some are in the US, that means access at late hours but I'm entirely capable of managing this and I know the trade offs involved and then manage through those as well. I talk with my children directly about the risks, what to do, what not to do and why. If the government moves forward with these blanket curfews, that will cut my child off from their best friend for good which will very seriously impact their mental health. I will absolutely not accept the government harming my child in this manner.