Get up and at ’em! 🎶🕺💃🤣🐶

🤣🤣🤣

OMG too funny and so true.

What’s being filed here isn’t rhetoric. It’s a request for clarity under federal law—nothing more, nothing less. Unite4Freedom isn’t asking the court to overturn elections. They’re asking a much more fundamental question: Do federal statutes—like record retention, reconciliation, and auditability—actually mean what they say? Because if they do, then compliance isn’t optional. It’s mandatory. And that’s where this gets serious. This filing lays out concerns grounded in official state records: Voter counts not matching ballot totals Millions of post-certification record changes Registrations that violate NVRA standards Records that cannot fully reconstruct the election Those aren’t opinions. Those are conditions that can be tested against the law. So the question becomes simple: If election records don’t reconcile… If they change after certification… If they can’t be used to reconstruct the result… Then on what legal basis is certification considered valid? This case forces that answer into the open. Not through headlines. Not through labels. But through statutory interpretation and evidence. Because in a court of law, there’s no such thing as “trust the system.” There is only: Records. Compliance. Proof.

Riverside Valley Scorecard unite4freedom.com/wp-content…

Looks just like my windows