Urbanist interested in better growth. Neighbourhoods. Biomimicry. Piazzas everywhere. Make transit networks the city.

Joined March 2012
1,904 Photos and videos
Graham Churchill retweeted
Replying to @EvanLSolomon
Hey Evan, Think of the great recreational things we could do with the lands of Billy Bishop Airport if we turned it back to a park. As a Liberal MP from Toronto, can we count on your support? Let’s make The Toronto Harbourlands the greatest city attraction on Earth.
Replying to @CityNewsTO
Torontonians need to provide feedback to the federal government on the Billy Bishop consultation. Here is mine. “There are significant problems with Doug Ford’s plan to expand Billy Bishop Airport for jets. First, it makes little economic sense. Traffic remains below pre-COVID peaks (~1.75M vs 2.8M). The CEO of Air Canada, Michael Rosseau, says he was not even consulted on the plan until he read it in the news—this despite that Air Canada is a major player in Billy Bishop airport. The issue, for Mr. Rosseau, is that the success of airports comes from their network connections. Billy Bishop weakens those connections for Pearson. It is a self-inflicted wound. To accommodate jets, BB will need to be expanded, greatly. It will need a longer runway, storage facilities for jet fuel, and greater transit connections. Toronto’s waterfront is already overcrowded. How can it manage more traffic? Estimates put the cost at $5B just to fill in the lake. This is a base cost. Meanwhile, Pearson is already undertaking a $3B expansion on its own. Second, how does an expanded BB airport benefit Toronto? Doug Ford says he wants to attract people for conventions. But people visit cities for their great attractions. People visit Barcelona to see Sagrada Família. People visit Montreal to see the Old City. Expanding BB airport will turn off more people than turned on. The expanded runway will go right in front of Doug Ford’s “white elephant” spa. Who will want to visit with planes flying right in front? The expanded airport will make the quality of life horrible for 200,000 people. Why will people want to live in Toronto? It will wreck Toronto Island, the Harbour, and the Port Lands. Doug Ford’s proposal makes no sense. The only reason he is doing it is because Nieuport Aviation (backed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management) bought the terminal from Porter Airlines in 2015 and is losing money. Ford’s former Deputy Chief of Staff, Mark Lawson, has been lobbying hard for Nieuport and he has Ford’s ear. This is a corporate socialist bailout. There is a better idea: Create the Toronto Harbourlands. Great cities have great natural destinations. They become the soul of the city. Vancouver, New York, Chicago, London, and Sydney are great cities because they have Stanley Park, Central Park, Millenium Park/Grant Park, Hyde Park, and Sydney Harbour. Toronto could have more compelling destinations than Kensington Market and the Distillery District. Its waterfront has the potential to be the greatest attraction in the world. But the city requires a vision, and a commitment to make that vision real. It needs the the Federal government. It starts with asking how we can make the Toronto Harbour the centre of the city—year round. How do we honour the city’s history? Countries are the products of geography. Canada is a country because of the Great Lakes. Toronto is a city because of the Scarborough Bluffs. They created the sand flows that formed the Toronto Islands and the natural harbour. They are the genesis of who we are. To become great, the Toronto Islands need fixed links that nevertheless retain the harbour. This means swing bridges over both the Eastern and Western Gaps and a circular trolley that connects Harbourfront, the Islands, and the Portlands. The second thing is to use one of our greatest assets — the extraordinary view of our city from the Port Lands. Doug Ford has been screaming about Toronto needing a new convention centre. OK, let’s put it in the Port Lands and give visitors the best view of Toronto. Connecting the Toronto Islands in this way would open the entire Toronto Waterfront from the Beaches to the Humber. We could have a bike trail through it all—the greatest waterfront in the world, the greatest city on Earth.  It would be a place that the whole world wants to visit. Why would the Federal government not want to get behind this vision?”
3
5
162
Graham Churchill retweeted
Replying to @CityNewsTO
Torontonians need to provide feedback to the federal government on the Billy Bishop consultation. Here is mine. “There are significant problems with Doug Ford’s plan to expand Billy Bishop Airport for jets. First, it makes little economic sense. Traffic remains below pre-COVID peaks (~1.75M vs 2.8M). The CEO of Air Canada, Michael Rosseau, says he was not even consulted on the plan until he read it in the news—this despite that Air Canada is a major player in Billy Bishop airport. The issue, for Mr. Rosseau, is that the success of airports comes from their network connections. Billy Bishop weakens those connections for Pearson. It is a self-inflicted wound. To accommodate jets, BB will need to be expanded, greatly. It will need a longer runway, storage facilities for jet fuel, and greater transit connections. Toronto’s waterfront is already overcrowded. How can it manage more traffic? Estimates put the cost at $5B just to fill in the lake. This is a base cost. Meanwhile, Pearson is already undertaking a $3B expansion on its own. Second, how does an expanded BB airport benefit Toronto? Doug Ford says he wants to attract people for conventions. But people visit cities for their great attractions. People visit Barcelona to see Sagrada Família. People visit Montreal to see the Old City. Expanding BB airport will turn off more people than turned on. The expanded runway will go right in front of Doug Ford’s “white elephant” spa. Who will want to visit with planes flying right in front? The expanded airport will make the quality of life horrible for 200,000 people. Why will people want to live in Toronto? It will wreck Toronto Island, the Harbour, and the Port Lands. Doug Ford’s proposal makes no sense. The only reason he is doing it is because Nieuport Aviation (backed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management) bought the terminal from Porter Airlines in 2015 and is losing money. Ford’s former Deputy Chief of Staff, Mark Lawson, has been lobbying hard for Nieuport and he has Ford’s ear. This is a corporate socialist bailout. There is a better idea: Create the Toronto Harbourlands. Great cities have great natural destinations. They become the soul of the city. Vancouver, New York, Chicago, London, and Sydney are great cities because they have Stanley Park, Central Park, Millenium Park/Grant Park, Hyde Park, and Sydney Harbour. Toronto could have more compelling destinations than Kensington Market and the Distillery District. Its waterfront has the potential to be the greatest attraction in the world. But the city requires a vision, and a commitment to make that vision real. It needs the the Federal government. It starts with asking how we can make the Toronto Harbour the centre of the city—year round. How do we honour the city’s history? Countries are the products of geography. Canada is a country because of the Great Lakes. Toronto is a city because of the Scarborough Bluffs. They created the sand flows that formed the Toronto Islands and the natural harbour. They are the genesis of who we are. To become great, the Toronto Islands need fixed links that nevertheless retain the harbour. This means swing bridges over both the Eastern and Western Gaps and a circular trolley that connects Harbourfront, the Islands, and the Portlands. The second thing is to use one of our greatest assets — the extraordinary view of our city from the Port Lands. Doug Ford has been screaming about Toronto needing a new convention centre. OK, let’s put it in the Port Lands and give visitors the best view of Toronto. Connecting the Toronto Islands in this way would open the entire Toronto Waterfront from the Beaches to the Humber. We could have a bike trail through it all—the greatest waterfront in the world, the greatest city on Earth.  It would be a place that the whole world wants to visit. Why would the Federal government not want to get behind this vision?”
1
6
12
833
More corporate socialism from Ford. All he does is bail out his friends.
The Ford government says the cost to build a new parking garage at the redeveloped Ontario Place will be less than $200 million. toronto.citynews.ca/2026/06/…
6
20
295
Graham Churchill retweeted
Upzoning unquestionably increases land value. That's why I constantly get ads on every platform letting me know I can now tear down my SFH and build a multiplex and make tons of money.
1
1
54
Graham Churchill retweeted
A majority of Canadians are deeply unhappy with their country’s much-vaunted healthcare system. Not a surprise when 5.9 million adults do not have a family doctor or primary care team. A recent Nanos poll shows that 91% of Canadians want to see immediate and extensive changes to healthcare and 70% are worried or frustrated by existing conditions. Just 14% think healthcare is moving in the right direction and only 12% say they were hopeful. All of which reflects an overstressed healthcare system, which is part of the flock of chickens coming home to roost from Canada’s deliberately driven population growth that started in 1990 with Brian Mulroney and was turbocharged by Justin Trudeau. Per capita hospital beds are one indicator, falling from 6.9 per 1000 people in 1976 to 2.6 per 1000 people in 2020. And those numbers are from before the out-of-control immigration of 2022 and 2023, during each of which over one million newcomers (permanent and non-permanent residents) were brought to Canada. nanos.co/why-canadians-want-…
1
2
2
49
Graham Churchill retweeted
Porter sold BB airport because it wasn't financially viable w/o jets & Toronto Port Authority pact was airtight against them. They unloaded it for $750M by to investors who dream in technicolor. This Trumpian dedication to wealthy people at the expense of the taxpayer must stop.
2
6
35
1,360
Graham Churchill retweeted
No. Alberta created the Heritage Fund. Norway copied it, and funded it properly, while Alberta governments preferred to not have any sales tax and raid the Fund instead.
Norway found oil. Built a $1.7 trillion sovereign wealth fund. Alberta found oil. Sent the money to Ottawa. Independence means we keep what we build.
4
2
6
479
Graham Churchill retweeted
Replying to @MarkJCarney
@MarkJCarney Torontonians DO NOT want the island airport expansion & are devastated by ruination of Toronto's waterfront & the corruption associated with the Ford govt. "NO" to The "SPA", Ont. Place Demo, Sci. Centre move, FOI cancellation, Greenbelt investigation not finished.
Both Porter and Air Canada already fly out of both airports. Pearson just broke ground on a $3B expansion. We don’t need a $5B lake-fill project at Billy Bishop that will undermine Ontario Place, the Islands, the Port Lands, and the waterfront. This push exists because Nieuport Aviation (backed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management) bought the terminal from Porter in 2015 — and it’s not delivering. Traffic remains well below pre-COVID peaks (~1.75M vs 2.8M). Ford’s former Deputy Chief of Staff, Mark Lawson, has been lobbying hard for Nieuport and he has Ford’s ear. A better idea: Swing bridges on the Eastern Western Gaps for ped/bike/trolley access. This would open up the entire waterfront from the Beaches to the Humber. Turn the Islands (tied to the Port Lands) into a world-class car-free park like NYC’s Central Park or Chicago’s Millennium Park — year-round tourism, recreation, no more ferry bottlenecks. Waterfronts are for people, not runways. Toronto has aspired for decades to be a great city but consistently screws it up. Let’s finally do something to make Toronto a city we can be proud of.
10
20
794
Graham Churchill retweeted
Accurate
Both Porter and Air Canada already fly out of both airports. Pearson just broke ground on a $3B expansion. We don’t need a $5B lake-fill project at Billy Bishop that will undermine Ontario Place, the Islands, the Port Lands, and the waterfront. This push exists because Nieuport Aviation (backed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management) bought the terminal from Porter in 2015 — and it’s not delivering. Traffic remains well below pre-COVID peaks (~1.75M vs 2.8M). Ford’s former Deputy Chief of Staff, Mark Lawson, has been lobbying hard for Nieuport and he has Ford’s ear. A better idea: Swing bridges on the Eastern Western Gaps for ped/bike/trolley access. This would open up the entire waterfront from the Beaches to the Humber. Turn the Islands (tied to the Port Lands) into a world-class car-free park like NYC’s Central Park or Chicago’s Millennium Park — year-round tourism, recreation, no more ferry bottlenecks. Waterfronts are for people, not runways. Toronto has aspired for decades to be a great city but consistently screws it up. Let’s finally do something to make Toronto a city we can be proud of.
1
1
42
Graham Churchill retweeted
Both Porter and Air Canada already fly out of both airports. Pearson just broke ground on a $3B expansion. We don’t need a $5B lake-fill project at Billy Bishop that will undermine Ontario Place, the Islands, the Port Lands, and the waterfront. This push exists because Nieuport Aviation (backed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management) bought the terminal from Porter in 2015 — and it’s not delivering. Traffic remains well below pre-COVID peaks (~1.75M vs 2.8M). Ford’s former Deputy Chief of Staff, Mark Lawson, has been lobbying hard for Nieuport and he has Ford’s ear. A better idea: Swing bridges on the Eastern Western Gaps for ped/bike/trolley access. This would open up the entire waterfront from the Beaches to the Humber. Turn the Islands (tied to the Port Lands) into a world-class car-free park like NYC’s Central Park or Chicago’s Millennium Park — year-round tourism, recreation, no more ferry bottlenecks. Waterfronts are for people, not runways. Toronto has aspired for decades to be a great city but consistently screws it up. Let’s finally do something to make Toronto a city we can be proud of.
10
167
414
6,920
Graham Churchill retweeted
The root of the Billy Bishop Airport expansion plan is that Nieuport Aviation Infrastructure Partners (aka JP Morgan) wildly overpaid Porter ($750M) in 2015. Without an expansion, Nieuport likely has no way to recoup its investment. It's about the $$$$ spacing.ca/toronto/wp-conten…
64
457
1,064
174,739
Graham Churchill retweeted
Replying to @MarkJCarney
@MarkJCarney Please just do the right thing for Toronto! Ontario! And Canada! Yes-environment, waterfront, islands! NO Doug Ford’s gutting all for unwise, senseless development. No need to expand downtown airport. Think of Toronto! Not JP Morgan!#NoJetsTO #BillyBishop #Toronto
Both Porter and Air Canada already fly out of both airports. Pearson just broke ground on a $3B expansion. We don’t need a $5B lake-fill project at Billy Bishop that will undermine Ontario Place, the Islands, the Port Lands, and the waterfront. This push exists because Nieuport Aviation (backed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management) bought the terminal from Porter in 2015 — and it’s not delivering. Traffic remains well below pre-COVID peaks (~1.75M vs 2.8M). Ford’s former Deputy Chief of Staff, Mark Lawson, has been lobbying hard for Nieuport and he has Ford’s ear. A better idea: Swing bridges on the Eastern Western Gaps for ped/bike/trolley access. This would open up the entire waterfront from the Beaches to the Humber. Turn the Islands (tied to the Port Lands) into a world-class car-free park like NYC’s Central Park or Chicago’s Millennium Park — year-round tourism, recreation, no more ferry bottlenecks. Waterfronts are for people, not runways. Toronto has aspired for decades to be a great city but consistently screws it up. Let’s finally do something to make Toronto a city we can be proud of.
5
9
176
Graham Churchill retweeted
PM Carney says Canada is in a recession in part due to immigration cuts tanking population growth. He points out "household incomes" are rising. Startling admission of what restrictionists have always said: mass immigration juices GDP while dragging down standard of living.
466
615
5,786
719,656
Truly nuts.
On today’s episode of… “Only in Ontario” 😂 Bro really said “screw it” and took the 401 on a bicycle… In the middle of rush hour traffic with semis and SUVs flying by at 120km/h. This is how Darwin Awards get earned, folks. 401 drivers have truly seen it all now. You catching this on your dashcam too? #401 #Ontario #Toronto #HighwayFail #OnlyInCanada #WhatTheActual
80
Graham Churchill retweeted
Central Park is great, but it takes up a lot of space and isn’t utilized to its full potential. That’s why I worked with McKinsey on a plan to make it a state of the art data center, complemented by rooftop parking and nuclear power. We can still build beautiful things.
1,320
1,102
8,673
513,952
Similar argument to Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s for paving over Toronto Island Park to accommodate an airport that can handle jets. Who needs parks anyway.
Central Park is great, but it takes up a lot of space and isn’t utilized to its full potential. That’s why I worked with McKinsey on a plan to make it a state of the art data center, complemented by rooftop parking and nuclear power. We can still build beautiful things.
1
2
11
507
Graham Churchill retweeted
This deserves serious scrutiny. We should not accept such chicanery as being normal in a G7 democracy. I believe nominations - provincial & federal - need more transparency and regulation. The Hogue Inquiry called nomination contests a ‘gateway’ for foreign interference.
#BREAKING: Nate Erskine-Smith has filed a notice of appeal to the Ontario Liberal party to challenge the results of the Scarborough Southwest nomination, alleging "serious irregularities," according of a copy viewed by the Globe and Mail #onpoli
313
194
1,322
102,673
A good opportunity to close the Island Airport entirely and make the islands a beautiful get away from the city.
Let’s build the world’s best city park instead that people can actually use incorporate the Port Lands, the Island, and Harbourfront into one vision.
3
23
79
1,153
Graham Churchill retweeted
Replying to @globeandmail
Exactly. Why should New York and Chicago and London and Berlin and Munich and Vancouver and Paris have great parks in the heart of their city and Toronto settle for an airport?
Replying to @fordnation
Dear Premier Ford, Great cities have unique places people want to visit. Toronto has few of them. But it does have two, or it could: the Toronto Islands and the Harbourfront. Both will be destroyed by expanding Billy Bishop airport. If you want to make Toronto a great place people want to visit, put a train/passenger bridge on the Eastern and Western Gaps and put in a circular tram to go around it. It would turn the harbour into an amazing playground with the best view in the world and make Toronto a must visit destination. Don’t destroy Toronto with an island airport.
3
12
648
Excellent letter. The people who use the Toronto Islands come from all income levels, one of the things that make Toronto work. Many of these families can’t afford to fly anywhere but they can afford a ferry ride to the Islands. I hope @MarkJCarney is aware.
Replying to @NeilPasricha
I have posted this tweet on my blog as well: neil.blog/articles/an-open-l… And you support this please: 1) Send an email to your Member of Parliament (MP). Find your MP here: ourcommons.ca/members/en 2) Send an email to your Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP). Find your MPP here: ola.org/en/members/current 3) Send a letter in the mail to Mark Carney and/or your MP (no postage is necessary if mailed in Canada): (Name of Member of Parliament) House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1A 0A6
8
25
60
1,465