***Lakewood Rosh Kollel, Rabbi Avrohom Yeshaya Appel, Sued for Sexual Assault, Defamation by Plaintiff Claiming He Raped Her and Instigated a Coordinated Campaign to Publicly Defame Her***
According to a complaint filed in Ocean County Civil Court, Plaintiff, an immigrant and single mother of two, was in significant financial distress. In early 2020, according to the complaint, Plaintiff shared with her child’s teacher that she was having trouble paying for child care, and the teacher suggested she reach out to Rabbi Avrohom Yeshaya Appel, a trusted rabbi and pillar of the community who ran several charities and often counseled women in similar circumstances as well as being the Rosh Kollel at Cheshek Shlomo, which he owned.
In February of 2020, according to the complaint, Appel and Plaintiff met at a local Starbucks and Appel presented himself as a rabbi, mentor, advisor, and friend that Plaintiff could trust, confide in, and depend on. He also, according to the complaint, offered Plaintiff, who had significant experience in real estate, the opportunity to solicit investments on behalf of his real estate business and its development projects, structuring her compensation as an advance against future commissions. The complaint alleges that between June and July of 2022 Appel issued six separate payments to Plaintiff characterized as advances against future commissions totaling $20,000.
Plaintiff alleges that despite these payments being characterized as loans or advances Appel never requested that the funds be returned. During the same period, the complaint alleges, Appel also provided Plaintiff with financial assistance to pay for groceries and other necessities.
In June of 2022, according to the complaint, Appel came to Plaintiff’s home when he knew her husband was hospitalized and her children were in school, forced himself on Plaintiff and sexually penetrated her, despite Plaintiff’s clear and persistent cries that he stop. According to the complaint, the more Plaintiff pled for mercy the more aggressive Appel became. Before he left, the complaint alleges, Appel insisted that Plaintiff erase the Ring footage Plaintiff had of him entering her home, and supervised her as she did so.
In the months that followed, the complaint alleges, Appel forced himself upon Plaintiff and took sexual advantage of her on multiple occasions, as well as bombarding her with demands for sexual acts, and a steady barrage of texts containing crude and graphic sexual content. For example, according to the complaint, Appel sent Plaintiff a picture of himself along with messages saying he wanted to squeeze her breasts, lick her vagina dry, and others, along with a picture of his penis followed by comments about sucking it. Pictures of the aforementioned were attached as exhibits to the complaint.
The complaint alleges that Appel threatened and intimidated Plaintiff to be quiet about the abuse, repeatedly threatening her that an inmate who had taken the fall for Appel in connection with another matter would “take care of” Plaintiff if she disclosed any details regarding Appel’s sexual abuse and other conduct. Appel also allegedly told Plaintiff that he would have her exiled from the community if she chose to speak to anyone about the sexual assault. Appel also allegedly insisted that Plaintiff use a therapist he recommended and also scripted with her exactly what she should say to the therapist to get the help she needed to address the trauma he’d caused without revealing what had actually happened.
In July of 2024, according to the complaint, Plaintiff met with Rabbi Yosef Rabinovitch and shared with him evidence of the alleged sexual assault and other incidents. The complaint alleges that convinced by the evidence that something must be done to address the situation and the danger Appel posed to the community, Rabbi Yosef Rabinovitch summoned the help of other rabbis and together arranged an intervention with Appel. At that meeting, according to the complaint, Appel admitted that he had done terrible things to Plaintiff and that he had a problem. The complaint alleges that Plaintiff is not the only victim of Appel’s sexual acts and misconduct. In response, the complaint alleges, the rabbis directed, among other things, that Appel step down as a rabbi and from all other positions of trust.
In late 2024, the complaint alleges, Appel requested that Plaintiff and her husband meet with his attorney to discuss a resolution. At that meeting, according to the complaint, Appel’s lawyer advised Plaintiff that he was willing to make a lump sum payment of $50,000 to Plaintiff to cover her future therapy expenses if she and her husband agreed to release him from any claims related to the alleged sexual assault and keep all incidents between them confidential. The complaint states that Plaintiff and her husband rejected the proposal.
According to the complaint, when Plaintiff and her husband learned in November of 2025 that Appel continued to serve as a rabbi and hold positions of trust, Plaintiff’s husband went to Appel’s Kollel on several occasions to confront him, but Appel wasn’t present. The complaint alleges that later that month when Plaintiff’s husband went to the school he was confronted by Rabbi Rabinovich (not Rabbi Yosef Rabinovitch), one of the administrators of the Kollel, who advised Plaintiff’s husband that Appel now had a new Rabbi, Rabbi Henoch Pearl, who had permitted Appel to start teaching again. In response, according to the complaint, Plaintiff’s husband told Rabbi Rabinovich that he was going to continue coming to the school until he had the chance to talk to Appel, and that his wife was going to pursue a case in civil court.
The complaint alleges that when Plaintiff’s husband returned a few days later there was security present, and Rabbi Rabinovich told him to leave or the police would be called. A few days later, the complaint alleges, Plaintiff’s husband received a letter from a lawyer warning him to stay away from the premises of Appel’s home, Kollel, and other businesses and organizations.
According to the complaint, soon after learning that Plaintiff intended to pursue her claims in civil court, Appel, Robert Keleti, and Chana Rosenzweig launched a campaign to destroy Plaintiff personally and professionally and vindicate Appel publicly. The complaint alleges that Plaintiff’s ex husband acknowledged in a text message to Plaintiff’s close friend sent before the campaign began that Appel had reached out to Plaintiff’s ex husband to enlist his assistance in his plan to take down Plaintiff. In the same text exchange, according to the complaint, Plaintiff’s ex husband acknowledged that Rosenzweig had also contacted him during the same period and asked for similar help.
Plaintiff first learned, according to the complaint, in December of 2025 that the three of them had created a website with Plaintiff’s name as the URL in which the public was warned to beware of Plaintiff and that she was a danger to Klal Yisroel. The website, which was produced in full as an exhibit to the suit and was still live at the time of this post, alleges that Plaintiff stole funds raised for a couple whose wedding she hosted at her house. In fact, the complaint alleges, according to an affidavit provided by the couple, that Plaintiff attempted to raise $10,000 for the wedding, only managed to raise $2,000, and paid the remaining $8,000 out of pocket.
The website further alleges, according to the complaint, that Plaintiff blackmailed and extorted Appel based on a distorted account of relevant events between the two of them purportedly by a relative of Appel, and alleges that Plaintiff’s husband sent Appel a text message threatening that he and his wife were going to break the silence if Appel didn’t pay them $48,000 and purports to include a screenshot of the texts. The complaint states that as set forth in a statement by Plaintiff, she did receive funds from Appel but those funds were always understood by her to be an advance against future commissions, or gifts to help her and her children with their financial needs. In an affidavit filed as an exhibit to the complaint, Plaintiff’s husband contends that he never sent the text depicted on the website or any other message to that effect, and that they were manufactured.
The website also claimed, according to the complaint, that Plaintiff had told a rabbi that she had evidence of Appel’s reprehensible conduct but refused to turn over her phone for a forensic examination. In fact, the complaint alleges, Plaintiff met with this rabbi after she learned of the website and he confirmed that he had never spoken with Plaintiff or her husband, much less requested that she turn her phone over for forensic screening. There were further allegations on the website, according to the complaint, of blackmail, extortion, stealing from Appel under the guide of threatening suicide, asking for money under false pretenses, like her son’s Bar Mitzvah, and then threatening to use the record of payment as evidence of payment for “services” and threatening to publicize that information unless she was paid more.
Plaintiff, according to the complaint, unequivocally confirms in her affidavit that she never engaged in any such conduct.
The website further accuses Plaintiiff, according to the complaint, that Plaintiff enjoys having affairs with married men, has had countless married boyfriends in numerous places at the same time, hosts parties involving drugs and dancing between married and non married people, that she married her ex husband just to get a green card, that Plaintiff failed to keep Kosher, and that she had a revolving door of male visitors at her home. The website, according to the complaint, also disclosed Plaintiff’s address for the alleged purpose of inviting community members to further harass Plaintiff and her family.
Keleti, according to the complaint, took it upon himself to spread the message in other ways, posting a link to the website on his Facebook, and posting signs smearing Plaintiff throughout the community including Plaintiff’s children’s school, and similar materials on cars and mailboxes in the area.
Keleti, according to the complaint, is Chaya Rosenzweig’s father. Rosenzweig, according to the complaint, is a licensed real estate professional and the founder and owner of Rose Capital Group, a business that markets commercial real estate investment opportunities in Ocean County and other parts of the region to Israeli investors. Rosenzweig, according to the complaint, competes directly with Plaintiff in the solicitation of investments from Israeli investors in this very niche market, with a material overlap between Plaintiff’s and Rosenzweig’s respective networks of investors.
The complaint alleges that Rosenzweig’s animus to Plaintiff is driven by more than simple business competition, and that some of Rosenzweig’s investors had reached out to Plaintiff and expressed concerns regarding their investments with Rosenzweig. Plaintiff, according to the complaint, researched publicly available information about those investments and identified what appeared to be cause for concern. Rosenzweig is concerned, the complaint alleges, that like Plaintiff her investors are prepared to pursue claims against Rosenzweig in civil court and, like Appel, is using the website and the overall smear campaign to discredit any information Plaintiff provided to them.
Plaintiff alleges that Appel’s conduct and defamatory campaign with Keleti and Rosenzweig has destroyed her business, exacerbated her mental health, and compounded the trauma of the sexual assault.
Link to full complaint:
1drv.ms/b/c/4d571c0f42787270…