Daily tweets on writing, in the spirit (and sometimes the words) of Fowler's Modern English Usage but chiefly for American writers. Alter ego of @MatthewJFranck
This needless variant falls amid the three stools of ascent, ascension, and ascendancy, which have subtly different meanings. Here you want the last of the three, @wsj. wsj.com/us-news/law/supreme-…
This ill-made opening sentence,@theatlantic, tells the reader that Hamilton wrote the first Federalist essay at the beginning of the Constitutional Convention. The author knows better. The Convention began in May, and Hamilton wrote this in October. theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0…
A pronoun-antecedent disagreement, @wsjbooks. Since the pronoun appears in the quotation, either change the antecedent to something singular, or substitute a bracketed “[their].” wsj.com/arts-culture/books/t…
“”Their system ensured that Spartan males” … what, @wsjbooks? The thought is unfinished because its conclusion, “were equals,” was sawed off and marooned in the parenthetical. (Also, change the godawful verb “serviced” to “served.”) wsj.com/arts-culture/books/s…
This is a mess, @nytimes. Alarms, airbags, and sirens are the three things, but your sentence says alarms alone are the three things, just like the other two. nytimes.com/2026/05/21/movie…