I agree with this article's theme that old school environmental groups need to be more supportive of nuclear power, if they are to remain relevant in these times, and with younger generations. Article link in reply.
Quote:
"If the old guard want to maintain credibility as environmental leaders, they must start embracing nuclear power for what it is: an imperfect but increasingly popular source of carbon-free energy."
I'm not in complete agreement with the quote above. Nuclear is no less perfect than any other energy source. All sources have their problems.
Nuclear's environmental impacts are orders of magnitude smaller than those of fossil sources, and are similar to those of solar and wind. It costs more than solar and wind on a raw cost per kW-hr basis, but it is not intermittent. Analyses show that a mix of nuclear, renewables and storage will yield the lowest cost for a carbon-free grid.