I think to be good at research in bio and biophotonics and comp bio
you need to stop trying to follow instructions on how to be a good researcher
you need to start optimizing for being a great THINKER. after that, let yourself guide you to your research.
- read a lot but choose wisely what you read. a lot of written research in biology is practically lab protocols. if you’re a computational biologist your job is to know how that work is done and do that work, but it is, above all, to stay slightly above the nuances or you drown in them. be highly selective about the papers you truly let IN; some of them may have nothing to do with your particular field, but rare are the papers that aren’t trying to make data, they’re trying to prove and show FRAMEWORKS. hold on to those and understand how to think better.
- study math everyday and make your own models of things. of EVERYTHING.
- learn to be a systems thinker. always choose systems 2 thinking.
- do not get too caught in the bullshit. “it’s a nature paper so it matters” “it’s a stanford paper so it matters” stop thinking like an aristocrat. think like a scientist. when something makes sense, let it click. do not select by huge names and huge institutions. one of my favorite biology papers was written by a guy who has no biology degree.
- go back to the classics. there’s far too much people did back then that no one picked up on. learn the history of science. you’ll realize that a big reason why is because those ideas WERE credible but were made out to be a part of a hype bubble (for instance the cloning hype) and many times the authors themselves didn’t realize the INSANE extent of what they were really putting forth
- do things. this goes without saying. stop limited your imagination to the data online. the data I needed, needed an instrument that literally didn’t exist so we made it. why? because math and physics allowed for it. reality is your only actual constraint. opinions on reality are getting in the way of your science.