.
@RaoulGMI,
The East India Company accepted its charter willingly.
The Crown offered a monopoly; the Company took it.
Consensual from day one. That is not what happened here. Anthropic signed a $200M Pentagon contract. When the government tried to expand it to cover autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance of American citizens, Anthropic refused โ publicly, in writing, on principle. Hegseth gave them a deadline. They didn't comply. Trump ordered all federal agencies to immediately cease using Anthropic's products. The Pentagon designated them a supply chain risk โ a label previously reserved for foreign adversary contractors, never used against a domestic American firm.
Anthropic then sued for illegal retaliation. A federal judge agreed and granted a preliminary injunction. The appeals court fight is still live. That was FebruaryโApril. This week, the same hostile government issued the first-ever export control directive for LLM access โ pulling Fable 5 and Mythos 5 from every customer on earth with four hours' notice and no stated reason. This is not a company accepting a charter. This is a company that drew a moral line, got blacklisted, won round one in court, and is still fighting โ while the same adversary just proved it can switch off its most capable products globally, without notice, whenever it chooses.
On "acceleration":
Raoul's thesis requires two parties who trust each other enough to reach a stable arrangement. Look at what this week actually proved. Anthropic was caught covertly limiting Fable 5's capabilities for frontier AI researchers โ silently, with no disclosure. Backlash forced an apology. Three days later the government pulled the models entirely. Same seven days: Anthropic proved it will secretly shape what its model does without telling users. The government proved it will shut down a frontier model globally with four hours' notice and no reason given. Neither party trusts the other.
The EIC charter worked because both parties had aligned incentives. What exists here is a coercion arrangement between legal adversaries who both demonstrated bad faith in the same week. That is not a foundation for acceleration.
On TAM:
This is the first time in history the US has issued an export control directive for LLM access. Any company outside the US that built on Anthropic's API just discovered their infrastructure can be pulled mid-business-day by a government they didn't elect, for reasons they won't be told. That sovereign risk is now permanently priced into every non-US AI procurement decision.
Raoul calls it a market wobble. It is a structural event.
On open source as the escape:
@svembu said it the moment this broke: "Technology is the ultimate weapon. Globalisation is dead." He's right โ and he also understands why open source alone doesn't solve it. The model layer can be open. The infrastructure beneath it cannot. The chips are US-controlled. The fabs are in Taiwan and subject to US export controls. The cloud running most open source inference is AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud โ all US-domiciled, all subject to the same sovereign intervention Anthropic just experienced. A DeepSeek model on US-controlled H100s through AWS is one export directive away from the same Friday evening disruption.
Where Raoul is right:
His geopolitical read is correct. The government wants privileged access, not shutdown. The 30โ60 day technical lead framing is exactly how the national security establishment thinks. The "too big to fail" backstop will emerge. The Great Game of nations through technology firms is the correct frame for the decade ahead.
His error is not the destination. It is the map.
The arrangement Raoul describes will likely arrive. But here is what forces it โ and what he does not mention.
The US sovereign balance sheet carries honest liabilities north of $142 trillion.
The debt cycle reset is not coming. It is here.
A government navigating forced Treasury selling, a Fed that must monetise what no one else will buy, and an inflation print already above mandate cannot simultaneously afford a prolonged war with the only technology firms capable of delivering the productivity miracle its own Fed Chair has publicly bet on.
The fiscal pressure does not care about the Anthropic lawsuit. It does not care about the EIC analogy. It arrives on its own timeline โ and that timeline is shorter than the court case. That is what ultimately forces the arrangement. Not good faith. Not shared vision. The arithmetic.
The outcome arrives somewhere between arrival and exhaustion โ squeezed there by a debt clock that neither Raoul's charter nor Anthropic's lawyers can stop.
That is the honest timeline.
Raoul knows this too. The question worth asking is why not the acceptance. โ
@IndiaBitcoinMan
Anthropic has been publicly forced to bend the knee to the US government. The ban on Fable and Mythos reads like censorship, and the market will read it as the TAM of the frontier labs collapsing. Instead, I read this as the opposite, as an acceleration event...
The government MUST have first access, because this is The Great Game, the game of nations over the most powerful technology ever discovered, and a technological edge of 30 to 60 days is worth everything.
It's the same edge the labs already exploit internally. You build your next model with your unreleased frontier tech, never with the public one. That private head start is what keeps you accelerating ahead of the competition or at least in line with them.
The US needs that exact advantage now. Before the public, and before the Chinese open source models can copy it. They have no choice. They cannot allow their own technology to be turned against them.
What's being negotiated, in the usual outrageous, hard-ball Trump manner, is the new arrangement:
Anthropic and OpenAI are free market operators and state vassals at the same time. Nobody wants to curtail their growth. The Gov just wants to be Customer Number 1 with privileged access.
This is the East India Company all over again. A private enterprise left free to grow rich and dominant, granted protection and a clear run by the state, on the unspoken condition that it serves the crown's strategic interests first. That charter was the price of the monopoly.
It also sends a message to China and everyone else that US AI is now so advanced the state itself has to control it. They won't, not yet anyway. They just want privileged access, the rest is posturing.
And Anthropic will bend the knee, very soon...
The hidden outcome is the one that matters. The AI firms are now near-explicitly too big to fail, which means the debt funding the capex buildout comes with an implicit state guarantee.
That accelerates the build-out of intelligence. It doesn't curtail it...
Open source accelerates too, because going open ensures no state can intervene in the model itself. Though the same Great Game rules apply there, and the Chinese state will take its own privileged access first.
So the market may wobble, convinced the TAM of AI just collapsed.
The real outcome is an acceleration of intelligence, and a Super Cycle that keeps running.