Bitcoin Maxi, Family Man, Avid Foodie & Exploratory Traveler. #GlobalMacro, #Bitcoin, #Geoeconomics

Joined February 2020
427 Photos and videos
In Order to truly understand #bitcoin , you need to first understand Inflation. Here's my 3-point summary: 1. The Fiat Monetary System that we currently live in with free floating abundant currencies (i.e. not pegged to any base Money like Gold) forces you to mis-price Capital.
17
16
120
29,383
Hype is a queue. Scarcity is a door. The crowd confuses the two every cycle โ€” then re-queues a year late at 5x the price.
6
225
.@RaoulGMI, The East India Company accepted its charter willingly. The Crown offered a monopoly; the Company took it. Consensual from day one. That is not what happened here. Anthropic signed a $200M Pentagon contract. When the government tried to expand it to cover autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance of American citizens, Anthropic refused โ€” publicly, in writing, on principle. Hegseth gave them a deadline. They didn't comply. Trump ordered all federal agencies to immediately cease using Anthropic's products. The Pentagon designated them a supply chain risk โ€” a label previously reserved for foreign adversary contractors, never used against a domestic American firm. Anthropic then sued for illegal retaliation. A federal judge agreed and granted a preliminary injunction. The appeals court fight is still live. That was Februaryโ€“April. This week, the same hostile government issued the first-ever export control directive for LLM access โ€” pulling Fable 5 and Mythos 5 from every customer on earth with four hours' notice and no stated reason. This is not a company accepting a charter. This is a company that drew a moral line, got blacklisted, won round one in court, and is still fighting โ€” while the same adversary just proved it can switch off its most capable products globally, without notice, whenever it chooses. On "acceleration": Raoul's thesis requires two parties who trust each other enough to reach a stable arrangement. Look at what this week actually proved. Anthropic was caught covertly limiting Fable 5's capabilities for frontier AI researchers โ€” silently, with no disclosure. Backlash forced an apology. Three days later the government pulled the models entirely. Same seven days: Anthropic proved it will secretly shape what its model does without telling users. The government proved it will shut down a frontier model globally with four hours' notice and no reason given. Neither party trusts the other. The EIC charter worked because both parties had aligned incentives. What exists here is a coercion arrangement between legal adversaries who both demonstrated bad faith in the same week. That is not a foundation for acceleration. On TAM: This is the first time in history the US has issued an export control directive for LLM access. Any company outside the US that built on Anthropic's API just discovered their infrastructure can be pulled mid-business-day by a government they didn't elect, for reasons they won't be told. That sovereign risk is now permanently priced into every non-US AI procurement decision. Raoul calls it a market wobble. It is a structural event. On open source as the escape: @svembu said it the moment this broke: "Technology is the ultimate weapon. Globalisation is dead." He's right โ€” and he also understands why open source alone doesn't solve it. The model layer can be open. The infrastructure beneath it cannot. The chips are US-controlled. The fabs are in Taiwan and subject to US export controls. The cloud running most open source inference is AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud โ€” all US-domiciled, all subject to the same sovereign intervention Anthropic just experienced. A DeepSeek model on US-controlled H100s through AWS is one export directive away from the same Friday evening disruption. Where Raoul is right: His geopolitical read is correct. The government wants privileged access, not shutdown. The 30โ€“60 day technical lead framing is exactly how the national security establishment thinks. The "too big to fail" backstop will emerge. The Great Game of nations through technology firms is the correct frame for the decade ahead. His error is not the destination. It is the map. The arrangement Raoul describes will likely arrive. But here is what forces it โ€” and what he does not mention. The US sovereign balance sheet carries honest liabilities north of $142 trillion. The debt cycle reset is not coming. It is here. A government navigating forced Treasury selling, a Fed that must monetise what no one else will buy, and an inflation print already above mandate cannot simultaneously afford a prolonged war with the only technology firms capable of delivering the productivity miracle its own Fed Chair has publicly bet on. The fiscal pressure does not care about the Anthropic lawsuit. It does not care about the EIC analogy. It arrives on its own timeline โ€” and that timeline is shorter than the court case. That is what ultimately forces the arrangement. Not good faith. Not shared vision. The arithmetic. The outcome arrives somewhere between arrival and exhaustion โ€” squeezed there by a debt clock that neither Raoul's charter nor Anthropic's lawyers can stop. That is the honest timeline. Raoul knows this too. The question worth asking is why not the acceptance. โ€” @IndiaBitcoinMan
Anthropic has been publicly forced to bend the knee to the US government. The ban on Fable and Mythos reads like censorship, and the market will read it as the TAM of the frontier labs collapsing. Instead, I read this as the opposite, as an acceleration event... The government MUST have first access, because this is The Great Game, the game of nations over the most powerful technology ever discovered, and a technological edge of 30 to 60 days is worth everything. It's the same edge the labs already exploit internally. You build your next model with your unreleased frontier tech, never with the public one. That private head start is what keeps you accelerating ahead of the competition or at least in line with them. The US needs that exact advantage now. Before the public, and before the Chinese open source models can copy it. They have no choice. They cannot allow their own technology to be turned against them. What's being negotiated, in the usual outrageous, hard-ball Trump manner, is the new arrangement: Anthropic and OpenAI are free market operators and state vassals at the same time. Nobody wants to curtail their growth. The Gov just wants to be Customer Number 1 with privileged access. This is the East India Company all over again. A private enterprise left free to grow rich and dominant, granted protection and a clear run by the state, on the unspoken condition that it serves the crown's strategic interests first. That charter was the price of the monopoly. It also sends a message to China and everyone else that US AI is now so advanced the state itself has to control it. They won't, not yet anyway. They just want privileged access, the rest is posturing. And Anthropic will bend the knee, very soon... The hidden outcome is the one that matters. The AI firms are now near-explicitly too big to fail, which means the debt funding the capex buildout comes with an implicit state guarantee. That accelerates the build-out of intelligence. It doesn't curtail it... Open source accelerates too, because going open ensures no state can intervene in the model itself. Though the same Great Game rules apply there, and the Chinese state will take its own privileged access first. So the market may wobble, convinced the TAM of AI just collapsed. The real outcome is an acceleration of intelligence, and a Super Cycle that keeps running.
1
543
Hey, can someone please help me. X has flagged my website. I tried connecting with @premium and also sent an email to X support, but no response as yet. My website has no scammy/phishing or information/money solicitation links. It's pure gold macro research. Any workarounds?
4
3
563
I shall be highly obliged if you could help ?
1
1
412
This is Article 5 of The Invisible Cage โ€” Plain Sight Research. Mises proved it. Hayek mapped it. Rothbard condemned it. Friedman did something none of them could. He made the world understand it โ€” empirically, publicly, and on television.
1
6
609
Friedman died in 2006. The Bitcoin whitepaper was two years away. But in 1999, he said this: "The one thing that's missing, but that will soon be developed, is a reliable e-cash โ€” a method whereby on the Internet you can transfer funds from A to B without A knowing B or B knowing A." He described Bitcoin nine years before it existed. Peer-to-peer. No trusted intermediary. No government oversight. Bitcoin is the fixed monetary rule Friedman argued for โ€” written in mathematics, enforced by cryptography, beyond the reach of any committee. The showman had seen the door before the carpenter arrived to build it. Article 5 of The Invisible Cage. ๐Ÿ‘‡ x.com/IndiaBitcoinMan/statusโ€ฆ @LynAldenContact

1
1
228
Friedman made 10-part television series. He wrote bestselling books. He debated anyone, anywhere, on camera. He understood that being right is not enough. You have to be understood. That person scrolling at 11pm after a 10-hour workday โ€” wondering why their salary keeps rising but their life keeps getting harder โ€” deserves to understand what is happening to them. That person is in Delhi. Mumbai. Bangalore. Chennai. This series was written for them. โ€” @IndiaBitcoinMan
1
216
June 1991. India had $1.2 billion in foreign exchange reserves. Three weeks of imports. Gold was pledged to the Bank of England. The country was days from default. Manmohan Singh reached for Friedman's framework โ€” not because India's leaders had become believers, but because they had run out of options. Every sector that was liberalised grew. Every sector that remained controlled stagnated. The software industry โ€” unregulated by accident โ€” became one of the world's largest. The natural experiment was clean. Friedman would not have been surprised. He had been arguing for voluntary reform for forty years. Crisis was the only thing that worked. @Sanjay_Dixit
1
1
193
Friedman died in 2006. The Bitcoin whitepaper was two years away. But in 1999, he said this: "The one thing that's missing, but that will soon be developed, is a reliable e-cash โ€” a method whereby on the Internet you can transfer funds from A to B without A knowing B or B knowing A." He described Bitcoin nine years before it existed. Peer-to-peer. No trusted intermediary. No government oversight. Bitcoin is the fixed monetary rule Friedman argued for โ€” written in mathematics, enforced by cryptography, beyond the reach of any committee. The showman had seen the door before the carpenter arrived to build it. Article 5 of The Invisible Cage. ๐Ÿ‘‡ x.com/IndiaBitcoinMan/statusโ€ฆ @LynAldenContact

1
186
Friedman made 10-part television series. He wrote bestselling books. He debated anyone, anywhere, on camera. He understood that being right is not enough. You have to be understood. That person scrolling at 11pm after a 10-hour workday โ€” wondering why their salary keeps rising but their life keeps getting harder โ€” deserves to understand what is happening to them. That person is in Delhi. Mumbai. Bangalore. Chennai. This series was written for them. โ€” @IndiaBitcoinMan
2
191
Friedman examined monetary data from every major economy across four centuries. His conclusion: Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon. Not caused by greedy corporations. Not by oil shocks. Not by global factors outside a government's control. One cause. Every time. Without exception. The government printed more money than the economy produced. The rupee has lost 99.5% of its purchasing power since 1947 โ€” not because of bad luck. Because every government in New Delhi chose, consistently and deliberately, to print. Friedman called this what it is: not monetary policy. Monetary politics. @deepakshenoy
1
1
124
Friedman's most devastating framework. There are only 4 ways to spend money: 1. Your money, on yourself โ†’ you care about cost AND quality. Most efficient. 2. Your money, on someone else โ†’ you care about cost, not quality. 3. Someone else's money, on yourself โ†’ you care about quality, not cost. 4. Someone else's money, on someone else โ†’ you care about neither. Category 4 is government. Category 4 is public procurement. Category 4 is most of what the state does with your tax rupees. Every rupee that passes through the government moves from Category 1 toward Category 4. Not corruption. Not incompetence. The category.
1
2
121
Pick up a pencil. Nobody on earth knows how to make it. Not one person. The wood: Pacific Northwest. The graphite: Sri Lanka. The eraser: Indonesia. The tiny metal ring holding the eraser: Brazil. None of these people know each other. None of them planned to collaborate. None of them wanted to make a pencil. They responded to prices. The price system coordinated thousands of people across dozens of countries, speaking hundreds of languages, without a single meeting, memo, or ministry. If no one person can make a pencil โ€” what makes anyone think a government committee can run an economy?
1
1
130