Joined August 2015
2,480 Photos and videos
Replying to @CzShO65M1PLDv5U
私が…作者です
35
Communists will have to lie. Communism: Slavery for workers, dressed up in Hegelian nonsense. Anarcho-Capitalism: Real freedom that embraces truth!
2
4
63
That makes you a statist, nice self own. And you're still a rape apologist (that's why you're still a virgin loser btw) Wanna know the funniest part ? i'm actually from a noble lineage, and you would be my bitch in feudalism XDDDD
Replying to @Inu_Loki
A Christian feudalist, get the terminology correct when you speak to me, statist.
1
72
You're both the statist and the rapist (or at least rape apologist) here. Your pinned is EVEN MORE proof of that, you think taxation is analoguous to rape, and that's a red flag. You're not against rape, you're joking about rape, different things :)
Replying to @Inu_Loki
Yes i did because all statists (you) are rapist, you have gone to my profile multiple times there is no way you did not say the pinned tweet lmao
1
2
102
Also, your whole profile screams INCEL so loudly it's deafening. Cant blame the girls tho, you're a pathetic piece of shit xD
1
26
Funny, i'm not the one that brought up rape. You did, rapist. Nice work self reporting by the way :)
Replying to @Inu_Loki
i know you are a rape apologist no need to say it out loud, its obvious from what you say
1
1
37
>he thinks anarchists are about property rights. I cant make this shit up XDDDD
"You're on the side of the thieves." "You can't consistently believe in thieves and illegitimacy of property." "Exactly, I don't care about theft, I'm just trying to annoy you!" It's working lol
1
19
Rape apologist, nothing of value will be lost if you follow your leader :) Hope you like the view when you're upside down :)
Replying to @Inu_Loki
You are the one that wants to rob others, you are the statist and rapist because property is an extension of the body
1
1
21
One of us is running, and i'm actually sitting :)
Replying to @Inu_Loki
Why are you running? Scared of arguing?
1
1
19
>statist >rapist The projection is unreal. You do realize: 1 - you're the statist here (feudalism fuckboy) 2- using rape tells more about your ideas than it does mine Congrats on YET AGAIN shooting your own foot 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 Fucking slave mentality right here, buddy.
"BRO THE KING INHERITS THE WHOLE COUNTRY" Good, its his property, don't touch my shit statist/rapist
1
1
33
BRO THE KING INHERITS THE WHOLE COUNTRY XDDDD You cant prove your claims, it shows :) No evidence, just vague "i have a blog" like anyone cares about your confused ass. No source either, citing yourself is just wanking.
Replying to @Inu_Loki
"You inherent your fathers cloths after his deaht? Birth privilege and caste!!!!!!" Bro this is what you sounds like 😭 And i already proved my point i have even given you sources and you refused to read them because you knwo you are wrong
1
36
L'anarchisme est anti religion. TOUTES les religions. Donc déso ma grande, mais t'es juste une poseuse, pas une anar :)
2
1
408
I trust historians over your confused ass on wether or not feudalism (the system entirely reliant on hereditary birth privilege) is caste based anyday :) You cant even prove your point, so i guess you do aswell, deep down. That's why you're not trying, afraid of a spanking.
Replying to @Inu_Loki
Notice how you trust historians instead of philosophers when it comes to philosophical issues? That tells everything about your lack of knowledge in the matter.
1
1
51
So, no proof at all ? Opinion dismissed, enjoy your blog that maybe 20 people will read, meanwhile i'll keep trusting actual historians :) Not a random confused retard on the net that think he would be a feudal king when his whole lineage is peasant descended XDDDD
Replying to @Inu_Loki
>given "proof" >you cite yourself vaguely "read my blog" Extactly
1
1
14
>given "proof" >you cite yourself vaguely "read my blog" >pretends he made a point How can i refute "proof" you havent provided exactly ? Are you for real ? XDDDDD You're embarrassing yourself, kid.
Replying to @Inu_Loki
> Asks for prove > Gets given proof > Gets mad and rejects to look at the proof Lmao you lost the plot XD
1
1
12
He's planning his next trip. Probably gonna mail pictures again.
1
7
>So by your logic anarchism is when you can't make contracts x.com/thetechnocrat0/status/… You did say that, strawboy :) Also, currently, your birth doesnt determine your overall posiition in society. "read my blog" No, nobody cares about your "opinion", retard :)

Replying to @Inu_Loki
"anarchism isnt about "contracts" or "property rights" moron" Strawman i did not say it was that i said that you said anarchism could not have that because you argued for it. Second you don't know the difference between caste and social structure, by your logic right now we live in a caste system, "You cant even cite what i should read" You didn't ask lmao, if you want soemthing to read you can just read my blog/X articles where I go into philosophical detail and you can finally understand why you are wrong.
1
1
13
Strawman again XDDD But yeah, anarchism isnt about "contracts" or "property rights" moron :) And see how you cant disprove feudalism is heavily reliant on castes ? after i proved it to you ? You cant even cite what i should read (because i'm right and the book would agree)
Replying to @Inu_Loki
So by your logic anarchism is when you can't make contracts and agreements with people? Interesting 🤔 "And feudalism is caste based" read a book bro its not that hard 😭you are embarassing yourself
1
1
17
"your logic doesnt make sense" It's just anarchism sorry you lack a frontal lobe to understand what it means :) Why are you running btw? you havent even tried to prove me wrong, confused larper :) And feudalism is caste based, ever heard of "tiers etat" "clergy" and "nobility" ?
Replying to @Inu_Loki
Bro just admit you lost the plot this is embarassing for you, notice how you I proved your logic does not make sense and then you have change subject? You can't argue anything, also Caste system really? This isn't india and the fact that you are bringing it up is telling me a lot about you XD
1
2
20
"refuted one" No bro, you just proved you had no clue about anarchism. Same here, it's only theft if you enforce property rights to begin with. hence "la propriété c'est le vol"
I already refuted one of them, and you didn't address it: if you don't believe in any form of property (justified control) then you can't believe in theft (unjustified seizure of control). There'd be no such thing as theft, unless it's an arbitrary standard for when called theft.
1
17