This is the problem, and I’ll be the first to admit, I was wrong with this topic (and will gladly admit that now). But if you clearly can’t define an Australian you’ll never be able to protect its people, culture and history.
An Australian is someone of Anglo Celtic European descent, with a small portion being our indigenous Australians. It’s a very distinct look on the world stage, and that matters, you’re not serious if you think that doesn’t matter. And if we don’t make a stand and protect that to ensure majority (not all but a large chuck like we had in the 90’s) stay looking like Australians then we will lose what we have. We have seen the glimpses of Multiculturalism with postcode machete wars, Islamic extremism and Indians who seem to be absolutely everywhere.
An Australian can’t go to India, get a citizenship then be Indian, same goes for an Australian going to Japan. So why is it different the other way around? It’s literally allowing the democratic replacement of Australians in their own country all in the name of DEI crap. The same argument goes for women with men in dresses invading their spaces, if you can’t define a women, you can’t defend women, same for Australians, if you can’t define an Australian, you can’t defend Australia.
And this goes for
@AngusTaylorMP and
@PaulineHansonOz as well. If they can’t define an Australian on the world stage and the demographic look, then can they defend it? If they can’t distinguish the difference between an Australian, Indian or Chinese then are they serious about protecting our beautiful nation and its people? Demographics do matter and we don’t want to be replaced in our own country. And the first step to defending it is defining it.
Albo can’t even distinguish between an Australian and an immigrant. Which means he doesn’t care if we are replaced.
I’ll do a reel on this today 🇦🇺🫡
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says there is no distinction between Australians, migrants and refugees, arguing that anyone can be Australian.