For the last several years, I constantly offered the top Protestant apologists formal debates and challenges and they all declined multiple times. Wilson, Ortlund, White, Huff, Winger, Ruslan, Wood, IP, Godlogic, etc. You can’t say it’s my “mean” behavior, because moderated debates police that - and what does that have to do with the arguments? The Protestant apologetic world is basically done. The main problem is they are fiercely afraid to address their own church relativism and a-historicity: they only want to attack icons or saints. Once their own made up sects are under question they flee. When I said I was done debating, it was done debating goober tards because that’s all that was left. If any prominent Protestant apologist can at least do well in a debate with Erhan, Qai, Sorin, I will follow up.